Economic Performance Analysis of Selected Military Hospitals Using Hospital Indicators and Inpatient Bed-Day Cost

E. Teymourzadeh, M. Bahadori, M. Meskarpour-Amiri, Javad Khoshmanzar, S. Hosseini-Shokouh
{"title":"Economic Performance Analysis of Selected Military Hospitals Using Hospital Indicators and Inpatient Bed-Day Cost","authors":"E. Teymourzadeh, M. Bahadori, M. Meskarpour-Amiri, Javad Khoshmanzar, S. Hosseini-Shokouh","doi":"10.15171/HPR.2019.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hospitals, the main providers of healthcare services, are costly centers which account for about 80% of the health sector budget and have a huge share of resources. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the economic performance of selected military hospitals in Tehran using hospital indicators and inpatient bed-day costs. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study conducted in hospitals affiliated with a military medical university. Data was collected with forms completed by referring to the hospitals’ finance and accounting, medical records, staffing, and logistics departments. The extracted data converted to hospital indicators using the appropriate formulas and analyzed using Excel and SPSS software with the T-test. Results: The average bed occupancy rate (BOR) was 71%, the average length of stay (ALOS) was 2.5 days, the average bed turnover (BT) was 31 times, and the average bed turnover interval (BTI) was one day. The comparison of means of all the above-mentioned indicators other than BOR with the national standards was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Inpatient bedday costs with and without capital costs were calculated to be 3312353 IRR and 12253775 IRR, respectively. Conclusion: Higher BOR and BT and lower ALOS and BTI indicators were appropriate compared with the national standards, but the cost performance was not appropriate. An unreasonable increase in inpatient bed-day cost revealed that there were unused beds and that hospitals had no monitoring systems for revenues and expenditures. Therefore, serious attention must be given to the scientific criteria and principles of health economics to improve resource productivity.","PeriodicalId":32113,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Practices and Research","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Practices and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15171/HPR.2019.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Hospitals, the main providers of healthcare services, are costly centers which account for about 80% of the health sector budget and have a huge share of resources. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the economic performance of selected military hospitals in Tehran using hospital indicators and inpatient bed-day costs. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study conducted in hospitals affiliated with a military medical university. Data was collected with forms completed by referring to the hospitals’ finance and accounting, medical records, staffing, and logistics departments. The extracted data converted to hospital indicators using the appropriate formulas and analyzed using Excel and SPSS software with the T-test. Results: The average bed occupancy rate (BOR) was 71%, the average length of stay (ALOS) was 2.5 days, the average bed turnover (BT) was 31 times, and the average bed turnover interval (BTI) was one day. The comparison of means of all the above-mentioned indicators other than BOR with the national standards was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Inpatient bedday costs with and without capital costs were calculated to be 3312353 IRR and 12253775 IRR, respectively. Conclusion: Higher BOR and BT and lower ALOS and BTI indicators were appropriate compared with the national standards, but the cost performance was not appropriate. An unreasonable increase in inpatient bed-day cost revealed that there were unused beds and that hospitals had no monitoring systems for revenues and expenditures. Therefore, serious attention must be given to the scientific criteria and principles of health economics to improve resource productivity.
基于医院指标和住院床位日成本的选定军队医院经济绩效分析
背景:医院是医疗保健服务的主要提供者,是昂贵的中心,约占卫生部门预算的80%,拥有巨大的资源份额。目的:本研究旨在利用医院指标和住院病人床位日成本分析德黑兰选定军队医院的经济绩效。方法:在某军医大学附属医院进行描述性、横断面、回顾性研究。通过参考医院的财务和会计、医疗记录、人员配备和后勤部门填写表格收集数据。提取的数据采用相应的公式转化为医院指标,使用Excel和SPSS软件进行t检验分析。结果:平均床位入住率(BOR)为71%,平均住院时间(ALOS)为2.5 d,平均换床次数(BT)为31次,平均换床间隔(BTI)为1 d。所有上述指标的比较方式除了BOR与国家标准具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。计入和不计入资金成本的住院住院日成本分别为3312353 IRR和12253775 IRR。结论:与国家标准相比,较高的BOR、BT和较低的ALOS、BTI指标较为合适,但性价比不合适。住院病人床位日费用的不合理增长表明有未使用的床位,医院没有对收入和支出的监控系统。因此,必须重视卫生经济学的科学标准和原则,以提高资源生产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信