An evaluation of the psychosocial group programme at an inpatient detoxification and stabilisation unit: a service improvement project

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Hannah C Rettie, Joya Georgewill, S. Stacey, E. Griffith
{"title":"An evaluation of the psychosocial group programme at an inpatient detoxification and stabilisation unit: a service improvement project","authors":"Hannah C Rettie, Joya Georgewill, S. Stacey, E. Griffith","doi":"10.1108/add-09-2021-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe benefits of including a psychosocial group programme alongside a medical inpatient detoxification and stabilisation regime has been recognised within addiction research; however, a “gold standard” psychosocial intervention has not been established. This small-scale study aimed to evaluate the psychosocial group (“Straight Ahead”) currently running at a substance use inpatient unit based in the UK.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA mixed-methods questionnaire design aimed to capture service user perspectives of the group programme via a questionnaire and assess whether an individual’s recovery capital and emotion regulation scores improved during their stay.\n\n\nFindings\nThirty-four service users participated in the evaluation. Results indicate the group significantly increased individuals’ recovery capital scores; however, it did not significantly improve emotion regulation. The three themes from the qualitative results focused on the importance of shared experiences, learning of new skills and the group as a positive experience. Service users provided suggestions for improvements, and these informed the provision of service-specific recommendations for the team and project commissioner.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe evaluation provides tentative support for the use of the Straight Ahead programme and provides an insight into what service users find helpful when attending a psychosocial group during an inpatient detoxification admission.\n","PeriodicalId":51922,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/add-09-2021-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The benefits of including a psychosocial group programme alongside a medical inpatient detoxification and stabilisation regime has been recognised within addiction research; however, a “gold standard” psychosocial intervention has not been established. This small-scale study aimed to evaluate the psychosocial group (“Straight Ahead”) currently running at a substance use inpatient unit based in the UK. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods questionnaire design aimed to capture service user perspectives of the group programme via a questionnaire and assess whether an individual’s recovery capital and emotion regulation scores improved during their stay. Findings Thirty-four service users participated in the evaluation. Results indicate the group significantly increased individuals’ recovery capital scores; however, it did not significantly improve emotion regulation. The three themes from the qualitative results focused on the importance of shared experiences, learning of new skills and the group as a positive experience. Service users provided suggestions for improvements, and these informed the provision of service-specific recommendations for the team and project commissioner. Originality/value The evaluation provides tentative support for the use of the Straight Ahead programme and provides an insight into what service users find helpful when attending a psychosocial group during an inpatient detoxification admission.
对住院戒毒和稳定单位的心理社会团体方案的评估:一个服务改进项目
目的在成瘾研究中已经认识到,将心理社会团体方案与医疗住院戒毒和稳定制度结合起来的好处;然而,社会心理干预的“黄金标准”尚未确立。这项小规模的研究旨在评估心理社会团体(“直向前”)目前在英国的一个药物使用住院单位运行。设计/方法/方法一种混合方法的问卷设计,旨在通过问卷获取服务用户对团体项目的看法,并评估个人的恢复资本和情绪调节得分在他们逗留期间是否有所改善。结果34名服务用户参与了评价。结果表明:实验组显著提高了个体的恢复资本得分;然而,它并没有显著改善情绪调节。定性结果的三个主题集中在分享经验、学习新技能和团队作为积极体验的重要性上。服务使用者提出了改善建议,这些建议为小组和项目专员提供了具体服务的建议。独创性/价值该评估为“向前走”方案的使用提供了初步支持,并深入了解在住院戒毒期间参加心理社会团体时,服务使用者认为哪些是有帮助的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Dual Diagnosis
Advances in Dual Diagnosis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信