Quadratic Hedging and Optimization of Option Exercise Policies

N. Secomandi
{"title":"Quadratic Hedging and Optimization of Option Exercise Policies","authors":"N. Secomandi","doi":"10.1561/0200000102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quadratic hedging of option payoffs generates the variance optimal martingale measure. When an option features an exercise policy and its cash flows are hedged according to this approach, it may be tempting to optimize such a policy under this measure. Because the variance optimal martingale measure may not be an equivalent probability measure, focusing on American options we show that the resulting exercise policy may be unappealing. This drawback can sometimes be remedied by imposing time consistency on exercise policies, but in general persists even in this case, which compounds the familiar issue that valuing an option using this measure may not result in an arbitrage free value. An alternative and known approach bypasses both of these pitfalls by optimizing option exercise policies under any given equivalent martingale measure and anchoring quadratic hedging to the resulting value of this policy. Additional research may assess on realistic applications the magnitude of the limitations associated with optimizing option exercise policies based on the variance optimal martingale measure.","PeriodicalId":39990,"journal":{"name":"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management","volume":"44 2 1","pages":"204-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/0200000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Quadratic hedging of option payoffs generates the variance optimal martingale measure. When an option features an exercise policy and its cash flows are hedged according to this approach, it may be tempting to optimize such a policy under this measure. Because the variance optimal martingale measure may not be an equivalent probability measure, focusing on American options we show that the resulting exercise policy may be unappealing. This drawback can sometimes be remedied by imposing time consistency on exercise policies, but in general persists even in this case, which compounds the familiar issue that valuing an option using this measure may not result in an arbitrage free value. An alternative and known approach bypasses both of these pitfalls by optimizing option exercise policies under any given equivalent martingale measure and anchoring quadratic hedging to the resulting value of this policy. Additional research may assess on realistic applications the magnitude of the limitations associated with optimizing option exercise policies based on the variance optimal martingale measure.
二次套期保值与期权行权策略优化
期权收益的二次套期保值产生方差最优鞅测度。当期权具有行权政策,并且其现金流根据这种方法进行对冲时,在这种措施下优化这种政策可能是诱人的。由于方差最优鞅测度可能不是等效概率测度,我们以美式期权为例,表明由此产生的行权政策可能不具有吸引力。这个缺点有时可以通过对行使政策施加时间一致性来弥补,但即使在这种情况下,通常仍然存在,这加剧了使用这种措施对期权进行估值可能不会产生无套利价值的熟悉问题。另一种已知的方法通过在任意给定的等效鞅测度下优化期权行权策略,并将二次套期保值锚定在该策略的结果值上,绕过了这两个陷阱。进一步的研究可能会在实际应用中评估基于方差最优鞅测度优化期权执行策略的局限性的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management
Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management Decision Sciences-Management Science and Operations Research
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信