The EU, Hungary, and Russian vaccine diplomacy

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
A. Betmakaev
{"title":"The EU, Hungary, and Russian vaccine diplomacy","authors":"A. Betmakaev","doi":"10.17223/19988613/78/13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Fidesz-KDNP alliance rise to power in April 2010 the relations between Hungary and the institutions of the European Union have been becoming more and more strained. A proponent of illiberal democracy, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has pursued a foreign policy shaped by nationalism, often disregarding Brussels stance and provoking conflict. The institutions have accused Hungary of abandoning the principles of liberal democracy and rejecting the European values and threatened to impose sanctions. Orbán played the Euroscepticism card domestically and with the members of the Visegrád Group that supported Hungary in its opposition to the EU's common policy concerning the migrant crisis of 2015. While some may consider Orbán a populist, his Brussels policy can strengthen Hungary's position in the Union. This paper studies how Budapest and Brussels interacted against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021 and what influence Russia had on that interaction. Hungary, having deviated from the course of Europeanisation in its foreign policy, has become increasingly inclined to position itself as a sovereign state, whose government stands up for its national interest and thereby comes into conflict with Brussels. In 2020, this trend developed into the Hungarian National Security Strategy based on the three foundational tenets: 1) Hungary recognizes the global changes and the emergence of an alternative world order;2) Hungary needs to build relationships with other global actors (Russia and China) besides the European Union that (as well as the West, in general) became a considerably weaker element of the international system;and 3) Hungary's policy is framed in the Berlin-Moscow-Istanbul triangle. To sum up, the de-Europeanization backslide within the Hungarian foreign policy manifests itself in Orban's rhetoric against Brussels, in his idea of the Visegrád Group as a prospective part of the Paris-Berlin axis, and in the reinforcement of the Hungary-Russia relations. The article demonstrates how Budapest leverages Russia's vaccine diplomacy to exert pressure on Brussels when Hungarian interests are at stake. The author dismisses the notion of Hungary as of a Russia's Trojan horse, because such view on the Orban's policy concerning the EU institutions is oversimplified and wants to emphasize that Hungary and Russia pursue different interests. The main finding of this study is that Orbán's EU policy is in itself manipulative, aimed at conforming the European foreign policy to the politician's own views. His eventual success would have a significant impact on the transformation of the EU. (English) [ FROM AUTHOR] Представлено развитие отношений между Венгрией и институтами Европейского Союза в связи с фактором России в период пандемии COVID-19. Рассматриваются особенности венгерской дипломатии по во- просам интеграции в контексте строительства нелиберальной демократии, политики открытости в отношении Востока и сотрудничества с Россией в преодолении последствий коронавирусной пандемии. Делается вывод, что, используя ситуацию кризиса и находясь в конфликте с Брюсселем относительно европейских ценностей, Будапешт пытается изменить правила игры в ЕС в соответствии с своими национальными интересами. (Russian) [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Tomsk State University Journal of History is the property of Tomsk State University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)","PeriodicalId":43070,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Istoriya-Tomsk State University Journal of History","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Istoriya-Tomsk State University Journal of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/19988613/78/13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the Fidesz-KDNP alliance rise to power in April 2010 the relations between Hungary and the institutions of the European Union have been becoming more and more strained. A proponent of illiberal democracy, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has pursued a foreign policy shaped by nationalism, often disregarding Brussels stance and provoking conflict. The institutions have accused Hungary of abandoning the principles of liberal democracy and rejecting the European values and threatened to impose sanctions. Orbán played the Euroscepticism card domestically and with the members of the Visegrád Group that supported Hungary in its opposition to the EU's common policy concerning the migrant crisis of 2015. While some may consider Orbán a populist, his Brussels policy can strengthen Hungary's position in the Union. This paper studies how Budapest and Brussels interacted against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021 and what influence Russia had on that interaction. Hungary, having deviated from the course of Europeanisation in its foreign policy, has become increasingly inclined to position itself as a sovereign state, whose government stands up for its national interest and thereby comes into conflict with Brussels. In 2020, this trend developed into the Hungarian National Security Strategy based on the three foundational tenets: 1) Hungary recognizes the global changes and the emergence of an alternative world order;2) Hungary needs to build relationships with other global actors (Russia and China) besides the European Union that (as well as the West, in general) became a considerably weaker element of the international system;and 3) Hungary's policy is framed in the Berlin-Moscow-Istanbul triangle. To sum up, the de-Europeanization backslide within the Hungarian foreign policy manifests itself in Orban's rhetoric against Brussels, in his idea of the Visegrád Group as a prospective part of the Paris-Berlin axis, and in the reinforcement of the Hungary-Russia relations. The article demonstrates how Budapest leverages Russia's vaccine diplomacy to exert pressure on Brussels when Hungarian interests are at stake. The author dismisses the notion of Hungary as of a Russia's Trojan horse, because such view on the Orban's policy concerning the EU institutions is oversimplified and wants to emphasize that Hungary and Russia pursue different interests. The main finding of this study is that Orbán's EU policy is in itself manipulative, aimed at conforming the European foreign policy to the politician's own views. His eventual success would have a significant impact on the transformation of the EU. (English) [ FROM AUTHOR] Представлено развитие отношений между Венгрией и институтами Европейского Союза в связи с фактором России в период пандемии COVID-19. Рассматриваются особенности венгерской дипломатии по во- просам интеграции в контексте строительства нелиберальной демократии, политики открытости в отношении Востока и сотрудничества с Россией в преодолении последствий коронавирусной пандемии. Делается вывод, что, используя ситуацию кризиса и находясь в конфликте с Брюсселем относительно европейских ценностей, Будапешт пытается изменить правила игры в ЕС в соответствии с своими национальными интересами. (Russian) [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Tomsk State University Journal of History is the property of Tomsk State University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
欧盟、匈牙利和俄罗斯的疫苗外交
自2010年4月青民盟-基民盟联盟上台以来,匈牙利与欧盟各机构之间的关系变得越来越紧张。作为一名非自由民主的支持者,总理维克多Orbán奉行的外交政策受到民族主义的影响,经常无视布鲁塞尔的立场,引发冲突。这些机构指责匈牙利放弃自由民主原则,拒绝欧洲价值观,并威胁要实施制裁。Orbán在国内以及与支持匈牙利反对欧盟关于2015年移民危机的共同政策的Visegrád集团的成员打出了欧洲怀疑主义这张牌。虽然有些人可能认为Orbán是民粹主义者,但他的布鲁塞尔政策可以加强匈牙利在欧盟的地位。本文研究了布达佩斯和布鲁塞尔在2020-2021年2019冠状病毒病大流行的背景下如何互动,以及俄罗斯对这种互动的影响。匈牙利在外交政策上偏离了欧洲化的路线,越来越倾向于将自己定位为一个主权国家,其政府维护其国家利益,从而与布鲁塞尔发生冲突。2020年,这一趋势发展成为基于三个基本原则的匈牙利国家安全战略:1)匈牙利认识到全球变化和另一种世界秩序的出现;2)匈牙利需要与欧盟(以及西方)之外的其他全球参与者(俄罗斯和中国)建立关系,欧盟(以及西方)在国际体系中已成为一个相当弱的因素;3)匈牙利的政策是在柏林-莫斯科-伊斯坦布尔三角关系中制定的。综上所述,匈牙利外交政策中的去欧洲化倒退体现在欧尔班反对布鲁塞尔的言论中,体现在他将Visegrád集团作为巴黎-柏林轴心的未来组成部分的想法中,以及体现在加强匈牙利-俄罗斯关系中。这篇文章展示了布达佩斯如何利用俄罗斯的疫苗外交,在匈牙利的利益受到威胁时向布鲁塞尔施加压力。作者驳斥了匈牙利是俄罗斯特洛伊木马的观点,因为这种对欧尔班有关欧盟机构政策的看法过于简单化,并想强调匈牙利和俄罗斯追求不同的利益。本研究的主要发现是Orbán的欧盟政策本身具有操纵性,旨在使欧洲外交政策符合政治家自己的观点。他的最终成功将对欧盟的转型产生重大影响。(英语)(从作者)ПредставленоразвитиеотношениймеждуВенгриейиинститутамиЕвропейскогоСоюзавсвязисфакторомРоссиивпериодпандемииCOVID-19。Рассматриваютсяособенностивенгерскойдипломатиипов——поросаминтеграциивконтекстестроительстванелиберальнойдемократии,политикиоткрытостивотношенииВостокаисотрудничествасРоссиейвпреодолениипоследствийкоронавируснойпандемии。Делаетсявывод,что,используяситуациюкризисаинаходясьвконфликтесБрюсселемотносительноевропейскихценностей,БудапештпытаетсяизменитьправилаигрывЕСвсоответствииссвоиминациональнымиинтересами。《托木斯克州立大学历史期刊》是托木斯克州立大学的财产,未经版权所有者的明确书面许可,其内容不得被复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到listserv。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这可以删节。对副本的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参阅原始出版版本的材料的完整。(版权适用于所有人。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书