Tratamento de esgoto sanitário usando MBR e MABR em plantas paralelas: remoção de DQO e DBO como indicadores de performance

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Douglas Silveira Moraes, Rebeca Carvalho Siqueira, José Roberto Guimarães
{"title":"Tratamento de esgoto sanitário usando MBR e MABR em plantas paralelas: remoção de DQO e DBO como indicadores de performance","authors":"Douglas Silveira Moraes, Rebeca Carvalho Siqueira, José Roberto Guimarães","doi":"10.20396/iwisdw.n1.2022.4791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New technologies and processes have been developed, searching for higher efficiency to improve the treatment of effluents discharged into the environment. This work presents the performances, advantages, and disadvantages of two of these processes, the MBR (Membrane Bioreactor) and the MABR (Membrane-Aerated Biofilm Reactor). The data were collected in a comparative study between a full-scale MBR plant and an MABR pilot plant installed in the same place, using the same raw sanitary sewage source. The MBR presented higher efficiencies for Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD). However, the MABR was more efficient concerning the indicators of electric energy consumption per COD load removed and COD load removed per reactor volume. It also was verified the need for and importance of having an efficient system to control and remove the suspended solids in the MABR reactor, being an impacting factor in the pollutant removal efficiency results.","PeriodicalId":35222,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/iwisdw.n1.2022.4791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New technologies and processes have been developed, searching for higher efficiency to improve the treatment of effluents discharged into the environment. This work presents the performances, advantages, and disadvantages of two of these processes, the MBR (Membrane Bioreactor) and the MABR (Membrane-Aerated Biofilm Reactor). The data were collected in a comparative study between a full-scale MBR plant and an MABR pilot plant installed in the same place, using the same raw sanitary sewage source. The MBR presented higher efficiencies for Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD). However, the MABR was more efficient concerning the indicators of electric energy consumption per COD load removed and COD load removed per reactor volume. It also was verified the need for and importance of having an efficient system to control and remove the suspended solids in the MABR reactor, being an impacting factor in the pollutant removal efficiency results.
在平行装置中使用MBR和MABR处理生活污水:去除cod和bod作为性能指标
人们开发了新的技术和工艺,以寻求更高的效率来改善排放到环境中的废水的处理。本文介绍了膜生物反应器(MBR)和曝气膜生物反应器(MABR)这两种工艺的性能、优缺点。这些数据是在一项比较研究中收集的,该比较研究是在同一地点安装的一个全规模MBR工厂和一个MABR中试工厂之间进行的,使用的是相同的原始卫生污水来源。MBR对化学需氧量(COD)和生化需氧量(BOD)均有较高的处理效率。但MABR在每去除COD负荷的电能消耗和每反应器体积去除COD负荷的指标上效率更高。同时也验证了建立一个有效的系统来控制和去除MABR反应器中的悬浮物的必要性和重要性,这是影响污染物去除效率结果的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society
Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society contains the papers read at the Society"s fortnightly meetings in London throughout the academic year, and short discussion notes on these papers. Papers are drawn from an international base of contributors and discuss issues across a broad range of philosophical traditions, including those which are of greatest current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书