There is poor agreement between manual auscultatory and automated oscillometric methods for the measurement of blood pressure in normotensive pregnant women.

F. Pomini, M. Scavo, S. Ferrazzani, S. Carolis, A. Caruso, S. Mancuso
{"title":"There is poor agreement between manual auscultatory and automated oscillometric methods for the measurement of blood pressure in normotensive pregnant women.","authors":"F. Pomini, M. Scavo, S. Ferrazzani, S. Carolis, A. Caruso, S. Mancuso","doi":"10.1080/714052781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the agreement between manual auscultatory arterial blood pressure values and the values obtained by an automated oscillometric device in normotensive pregnant patients. Methods: Arterial blood pressure was determined concomitantly by a Dinamap 1846 sx/p device and by one observer (I, IV, V Korotkoff sounds) blinded to the Dinamap values. Agreement between methods was tested and graded according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society. Results: A total of 490 observations were performed. Differences were observed between the manual auscultatory method and the Dinamap method. In monitoring normotensive pregnant patients with a Dinamap device, an error was made of about 10 mmHg in 22% of the observations for systolic arterial blood pressure (BP); in 11% for diastolic arterial BP (IV sound); and in 15% for diastolic arterial BP (V sound). According to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the overall grade reached was 'C'. Conclusions: Although an underestimation of only ...","PeriodicalId":79464,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"398-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/714052781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: To assess the agreement between manual auscultatory arterial blood pressure values and the values obtained by an automated oscillometric device in normotensive pregnant patients. Methods: Arterial blood pressure was determined concomitantly by a Dinamap 1846 sx/p device and by one observer (I, IV, V Korotkoff sounds) blinded to the Dinamap values. Agreement between methods was tested and graded according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society. Results: A total of 490 observations were performed. Differences were observed between the manual auscultatory method and the Dinamap method. In monitoring normotensive pregnant patients with a Dinamap device, an error was made of about 10 mmHg in 22% of the observations for systolic arterial blood pressure (BP); in 11% for diastolic arterial BP (IV sound); and in 15% for diastolic arterial BP (V sound). According to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the overall grade reached was 'C'. Conclusions: Although an underestimation of only ...
在血压正常的孕妇中,人工听诊和自动示波法测量血压的一致性很差。
目的:评价正常血压孕妇手工听诊动脉血压值与自动测压仪测血压值的一致性。方法:采用Dinamap 1846 sx/p测定仪测定动脉血压,并由一名不知道Dinamap值的观察者(I、IV、V Korotkoff音)测定动脉血压。根据英国高血压协会的协议,对方法之间的一致性进行了测试和评分。结果:共进行490次观察。手工听诊法与Dinamap法存在差异。在使用Dinamap设备监测血压正常的孕妇时,22%的收缩压(BP)观测误差约为10 mmHg;舒张期动脉血压(IV声)为11%;15%为舒张动脉血压(V音)。根据英国高血压协会的协议,总体评分为“C”。结论:虽然只有…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信