Speciation, risk factors, and antifungal susceptibility pattern of Candida isolates from urine sample of ICU patients: An observational cross-sectional study

Madhusmita Das, Abha Sharma, P. Loomba, B. Mishra
{"title":"Speciation, risk factors, and antifungal susceptibility pattern of Candida isolates from urine sample of ICU patients: An observational cross-sectional study","authors":"Madhusmita Das, Abha Sharma, P. Loomba, B. Mishra","doi":"10.4103/jhrr.jhrr_11_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The presence of Candida species in urine is rarely encountered in healthy people; however, it is of common occurrence in hospitalized patients and in critically ill patients and it may be life-threatening. It is a diagnostic dilemma to differentiate colonization from true infection. The aim of the study is to identify and speciate Candida species in urine, study associated risk factors, and determine the antifungal minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for different species. Materials and Methods: The study was an observational cross-sectional study conducted from March 2019 to December 2019 at the Department of Microbiology, GIPMER, Delhi. All consecutive urine samples received from ICU patients suspected of having urinary tract infection were processed for culture and sensitivity as per standard techniques. CHROM agar and standard yeast identification protocol were used for speciation of Candida species. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by VITEK 2 automatic machine. Significant P-value (<0.05) was calculated using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Out of 2963 patients, 250 (8.43%) had candiduria and 50 (20%) had candiduria with pyuria (pus cells> 5/HPF). Out of these 50, 8 (16%) were identified as Candida albicans and 42 (84%) were non-albicans species. The most common species was Candida tropicalis (38%). Duration of catheterization had no significant association with the type of Candida spp. Mechanical ventilation was the most important risk factor associated with non-albicans candiduria when compared with C. albicans (P=0.02). Antifungal susceptibility according to MICs showed 100% resistance to amphotericin B by C. albicans and almost 90% resistance by non-albicans spp. Candida glabrata was 100% resistant to fluconazole, and Candida haemulonii was resistant to all antifungals. Conclusion: Non-albicans Candida are emerging nosocomial pathogens. Candida speciation is important to guide patient management as non-albicans Candida species are more resistant to antifungal drugs. Azoles are more sensitive when compared with amphotericin B.","PeriodicalId":16068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research and Reviews","volume":"177 1","pages":"3 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrr.jhrr_11_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The presence of Candida species in urine is rarely encountered in healthy people; however, it is of common occurrence in hospitalized patients and in critically ill patients and it may be life-threatening. It is a diagnostic dilemma to differentiate colonization from true infection. The aim of the study is to identify and speciate Candida species in urine, study associated risk factors, and determine the antifungal minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for different species. Materials and Methods: The study was an observational cross-sectional study conducted from March 2019 to December 2019 at the Department of Microbiology, GIPMER, Delhi. All consecutive urine samples received from ICU patients suspected of having urinary tract infection were processed for culture and sensitivity as per standard techniques. CHROM agar and standard yeast identification protocol were used for speciation of Candida species. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by VITEK 2 automatic machine. Significant P-value (<0.05) was calculated using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Out of 2963 patients, 250 (8.43%) had candiduria and 50 (20%) had candiduria with pyuria (pus cells> 5/HPF). Out of these 50, 8 (16%) were identified as Candida albicans and 42 (84%) were non-albicans species. The most common species was Candida tropicalis (38%). Duration of catheterization had no significant association with the type of Candida spp. Mechanical ventilation was the most important risk factor associated with non-albicans candiduria when compared with C. albicans (P=0.02). Antifungal susceptibility according to MICs showed 100% resistance to amphotericin B by C. albicans and almost 90% resistance by non-albicans spp. Candida glabrata was 100% resistant to fluconazole, and Candida haemulonii was resistant to all antifungals. Conclusion: Non-albicans Candida are emerging nosocomial pathogens. Candida speciation is important to guide patient management as non-albicans Candida species are more resistant to antifungal drugs. Azoles are more sensitive when compared with amphotericin B.
ICU患者尿液中念珠菌的种类、危险因素和抗真菌药敏模式:一项观察性横断面研究
目的:在健康人尿液中存在念珠菌属是罕见的;然而,它在住院病人和危重病人中很常见,并可能危及生命。将定植与真正感染区分开来是一个诊断难题。本研究的目的是鉴定尿液中的念珠菌种类,研究相关的危险因素,并确定不同种类的抗真菌最低抑制浓度(mic)。材料和方法:该研究是2019年3月至2019年12月在德里GIPMER微生物学系进行的一项观察性横断面研究。所有疑似尿路感染ICU患者的连续尿样均按标准技术进行培养和敏感性处理。采用CHROM琼脂和标准酵母鉴定方案对念珠菌进行菌种鉴定。采用VITEK 2型自动药敏仪进行抗真菌药敏试验。显著p值(5/HPF)。在这50例中,8例(16%)被鉴定为白色念珠菌,42例(84%)是非白色念珠菌。最常见的是热带念珠菌(38%)。置管时间与念珠菌类型无显著相关性。与白色念珠菌相比,机械通气是非白色念珠菌最重要的危险因素(P=0.02)。mic结果显示,白色念珠菌对两性霉素B的耐药率为100%,非白色念珠菌对两性霉素B的耐药率接近90%,光念珠菌对氟康唑的耐药率为100%,假乳白色念珠菌对所有抗真菌药物均耐药。结论:非白色念珠菌是一种新兴的医院病原菌。念珠菌种类对指导患者管理具有重要意义,因为非白色念珠菌对抗真菌药物的耐药性更强。与两性霉素B相比,唑类药物更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信