THE DIGITAL BANKING PROFITABILITY CHALLENGES: ARE THEY DIFFERENT BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND ISLAMIC BANKS?

Patria Yunita
{"title":"THE DIGITAL BANKING PROFITABILITY CHALLENGES: ARE THEY DIFFERENT BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND ISLAMIC BANKS?","authors":"Patria Yunita","doi":"10.21002/jaki.2021.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the digital banking industry in uncertain global financial conditions. This analysis used binary logistic regression models, to predict the Indonesia commercial digital banking profitability performances in new normal life based on the analysis of digital banking performances in the second wave of global financial crisis 2017. The probability of bank profitability improvement as dependent variable. The Liquidity Risk, Bank Size, Bank Portfolio Risk, and E-Money transactions as independent variables. Fintech and Bank Type are used as control variables. The analysis period is 2015-2019, based on the time when the rapid progress of digital banking technology was adopted in Indonesia. Data obtained from 57 commercial bank annual reports, statistics of Bank Indonesia and The Financial Services Authority. By the Logit Regression Model, it is concluded that Liquidity Risk, Fintech and Bank Type do not statistically significant, while the Bank’s Portfolio Risk, E-Money transactions and Bank Size statistically significant influencing The Digital Banking Profitability Improvements. From the structural break analysis conducted at the level of the digital banking profitability, there is a difference in the time of \"shock\" between conventional and Islamic banks. The conventional banks was experienced a structural break over global financial conditions two months before Islamic banks.","PeriodicalId":31764,"journal":{"name":"JAKI Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAKI Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2021.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the digital banking industry in uncertain global financial conditions. This analysis used binary logistic regression models, to predict the Indonesia commercial digital banking profitability performances in new normal life based on the analysis of digital banking performances in the second wave of global financial crisis 2017. The probability of bank profitability improvement as dependent variable. The Liquidity Risk, Bank Size, Bank Portfolio Risk, and E-Money transactions as independent variables. Fintech and Bank Type are used as control variables. The analysis period is 2015-2019, based on the time when the rapid progress of digital banking technology was adopted in Indonesia. Data obtained from 57 commercial bank annual reports, statistics of Bank Indonesia and The Financial Services Authority. By the Logit Regression Model, it is concluded that Liquidity Risk, Fintech and Bank Type do not statistically significant, while the Bank’s Portfolio Risk, E-Money transactions and Bank Size statistically significant influencing The Digital Banking Profitability Improvements. From the structural break analysis conducted at the level of the digital banking profitability, there is a difference in the time of "shock" between conventional and Islamic banks. The conventional banks was experienced a structural break over global financial conditions two months before Islamic banks.
数字银行盈利能力的挑战:传统银行和伊斯兰银行有什么不同吗?
本研究旨在分析不确定的全球金融环境下的数字银行业。本文采用二元logistic回归模型,在分析2017年第二波全球金融危机中印尼商业数字银行业绩的基础上,预测新常态下印尼商业数字银行盈利能力表现。以银行盈利能力改善的概率为因变量。流动性风险、银行规模、银行投资组合风险与电子货币交易为自变量。金融科技和银行类型作为控制变量。分析期间为2015-2019年,基于印度尼西亚采用数字银行技术快速发展的时间。数据来自57家商业银行的年报、印尼银行和金融服务管理局的统计数据。通过Logit回归模型,得出流动性风险、金融科技和银行类型对数字银行盈利能力的影响不具有统计学意义,而银行投资组合风险、电子货币交易和银行规模对数字银行盈利能力的影响具有统计学意义。从数字银行盈利水平的结构性断裂分析来看,传统银行和伊斯兰银行在“冲击”时间上存在差异。传统银行比伊斯兰银行早两个月经历了全球金融环境的结构性崩溃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信