Academic status and practical experience of university teachers as factors of socio-psychological interpretation of their personality by students

A. Ivanov
{"title":"Academic status and practical experience of university teachers as factors of socio-psychological interpretation of their personality by students","authors":"A. Ivanov","doi":"10.33910/2686-9527-2021-3-1-41-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The article presents the results of an experimental study of the academic status and practical experience of a university teacher as factors that impact the socio-psychological interpretation of their personality. The study involved 65 psychology students from universities of Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad Region. The study participants, divided into four groups, were shown a video lecture about groupthink. The lecture was delivered by a female teacher with experience in psychological counselling and popularization of science. The academic status and practical experience of the teacher varied for each of the groups. The information about the instructor was presented at the beginning and at the end of the video. The information was compiled on the basis of a survey of students specialising in psychology. According to the results of the survey, we found that students assess the academic status of a teacher based, primarily, on the presence/absence of an academic degree, the number of publications (including international journals) and track record of research. Students evaluate practical experience on the basis of work experience and the number of positive reviews about the work of a practicing psychologist. The control group were only shown the teacher’s full name. Experimental groups were provided with the following information: 1) Academic status; 2) Practical experience; 3) Academic status and practical experience. All the information about the teacher was fictitious. After watching a video lecture, the study participants evaluated certain personality traits of the teacher on a seven-point scale. Factor analysis showed that students rated the teacher on the basis of the following scales: “Closedness/Openness”, “Competence/Incompetence”, “Immorality/Morality”, “Responsiveness/ Indifference”. The results of the study showed the perceived competence of the teacher is higher when students are aware of his/her academic status, while the information about practical work experience did not affect the first impression of the teacher.","PeriodicalId":30665,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation in Psychology Education and Didactics","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation in Psychology Education and Didactics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2021-3-1-41-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The article presents the results of an experimental study of the academic status and practical experience of a university teacher as factors that impact the socio-psychological interpretation of their personality. The study involved 65 psychology students from universities of Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad Region. The study participants, divided into four groups, were shown a video lecture about groupthink. The lecture was delivered by a female teacher with experience in psychological counselling and popularization of science. The academic status and practical experience of the teacher varied for each of the groups. The information about the instructor was presented at the beginning and at the end of the video. The information was compiled on the basis of a survey of students specialising in psychology. According to the results of the survey, we found that students assess the academic status of a teacher based, primarily, on the presence/absence of an academic degree, the number of publications (including international journals) and track record of research. Students evaluate practical experience on the basis of work experience and the number of positive reviews about the work of a practicing psychologist. The control group were only shown the teacher’s full name. Experimental groups were provided with the following information: 1) Academic status; 2) Practical experience; 3) Academic status and practical experience. All the information about the teacher was fictitious. After watching a video lecture, the study participants evaluated certain personality traits of the teacher on a seven-point scale. Factor analysis showed that students rated the teacher on the basis of the following scales: “Closedness/Openness”, “Competence/Incompetence”, “Immorality/Morality”, “Responsiveness/ Indifference”. The results of the study showed the perceived competence of the teacher is higher when students are aware of his/her academic status, while the information about practical work experience did not affect the first impression of the teacher.
大学教师的学术地位和实践经验是学生对其人格的社会心理解释的因素
. 本文介绍了一项关于大学教师的学术地位和实践经验作为影响其人格的社会心理解释因素的实验研究结果。这项研究涉及来自圣彼得堡和列宁格勒地区大学的65名心理学专业的学生。研究参与者被分成四组,观看了一段关于群体思维的视频。讲座是由一位具有心理咨询和科普经验的女教师主讲的。每组教师的学术地位和实践经验各不相同。关于讲师的信息在视频的开头和结尾都有介绍。这些信息是根据对心理学专业学生的调查汇编而成的。根据调查结果,我们发现学生评估教师的学术地位主要基于是否拥有学位、发表论文的数量(包括国际期刊)和研究记录。学生根据工作经验和对实践心理学家工作的积极评价的数量来评估实践经验。对照组只看到了老师的全名。各试验组分别获得以下信息:1)学术状况;2)有实践经验;3)学术地位和实践经验。所有关于那位老师的信息都是虚构的。在观看了一段视频讲座后,研究参与者用7分制对老师的某些性格特征进行了评估。因子分析显示,学生对教师的评价基于以下量表:“封闭/开放”、“胜任/不胜任”、“不道德/道德”、“回应/冷漠”。研究结果表明,当学生知道老师的学术地位时,他们对老师的感知能力更高,而关于实际工作经验的信息对老师的第一印象没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书