Attitudes Towards Physical Disability Scale Adaptation on a Russian Sample

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
M.O. Romanova, E.A. Kozhan, A.O. Bykov, L.A. Efimova, A.F. Asadullina
{"title":"Attitudes Towards Physical Disability Scale Adaptation on a Russian Sample","authors":"M.O. Romanova, E.A. Kozhan, A.O. Bykov, L.A. Efimova, A.F. Asadullina","doi":"10.17759/sps.2022130310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The Attitudes to Physical Disability Scale (ADS) adaptation.Background. Opinion polls show that in Russia perception of people with disabilities is complex and ambiguous. However, there is still no reliable method for measuring attitudes towards disability in Russia, but attitudes influence people with disabilities’ well-being and their inclusion.Study design. We conducted 2 studies. Within study 1 the original scale items were translated, tested at the stages of cognitive interviews and web-probing and corrected. Then a survey containing only the translated scale was conducted. In study 2 additional scales were included in the questionnaire in order to check the construct validity of the ADS.Participants. Study 1 sample included 627 respondents (45,6% men, Mage=35.99). Study 2 sample included 738 respondents (45,8% men, Mage=36.21).Measurements. During the research a series of cognitive interviews, web-probing and 2 surveys were conducted. Attitudes to Physical Disability Scale, social dominance orientation scale, just world belief scale and «Big Five Inventory» were used.Results. EFA results revealed the 3-factor structure of the Russian ADS version. CFA results indicated that the model has a good fit. Correlation analysis results proved scale construct validity, while high Cronbach’s α score proved its internal consistency.Conclusions. Russian ADS version proved to be a reliable and valid tool for investigating attitudes towards people with disabilities in Russia.","PeriodicalId":54079,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology and Society","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. The Attitudes to Physical Disability Scale (ADS) adaptation.Background. Opinion polls show that in Russia perception of people with disabilities is complex and ambiguous. However, there is still no reliable method for measuring attitudes towards disability in Russia, but attitudes influence people with disabilities’ well-being and their inclusion.Study design. We conducted 2 studies. Within study 1 the original scale items were translated, tested at the stages of cognitive interviews and web-probing and corrected. Then a survey containing only the translated scale was conducted. In study 2 additional scales were included in the questionnaire in order to check the construct validity of the ADS.Participants. Study 1 sample included 627 respondents (45,6% men, Mage=35.99). Study 2 sample included 738 respondents (45,8% men, Mage=36.21).Measurements. During the research a series of cognitive interviews, web-probing and 2 surveys were conducted. Attitudes to Physical Disability Scale, social dominance orientation scale, just world belief scale and «Big Five Inventory» were used.Results. EFA results revealed the 3-factor structure of the Russian ADS version. CFA results indicated that the model has a good fit. Correlation analysis results proved scale construct validity, while high Cronbach’s α score proved its internal consistency.Conclusions. Russian ADS version proved to be a reliable and valid tool for investigating attitudes towards people with disabilities in Russia.
俄罗斯人对身体残疾量表适应的态度
目标。对身体残疾量表(ADS)适应的态度。背景。民意调查显示,俄罗斯人对残疾人的看法是复杂而模糊的。然而,在俄罗斯仍然没有可靠的方法来衡量对残疾的态度,但态度影响着残疾人的福祉和对他们的包容。研究设计。我们进行了2项研究。在研究1中,原始量表项目被翻译,在认知访谈和网络探测阶段进行测试和纠正。然后进行仅包含翻译后的量表的调查。本研究在问卷中加入了2个额外的量表,以检验ads参与者的构念效度。研究1样本共627人,其中男性45.6%,男性35.99人。研究2的样本包括738名受访者(45.8%的男性,性别=36.21)。在研究过程中进行了一系列认知访谈、网络探究和2项调查。采用“身体残疾态度量表”、“社会支配取向量表”、“公正世界信念量表”和“大五量表”。EFA结果揭示了俄罗斯ADS版本的三因子结构。结果表明,该模型具有较好的拟合性。相关分析结果证明了量表结构的效度,较高的Cronbach’s α分数证明了量表结构的内在一致性。俄语版ADS被证明是一个可靠和有效的工具,用于调查俄罗斯对残疾人的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Psychology and Society
Social Psychology and Society PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信