Evaluation of No-reference quality metrics for Ultrasound liver images

M. Outtas, Lu Zhang, O. Déforges, W. Hamidouche, A. Serir
{"title":"Evaluation of No-reference quality metrics for Ultrasound liver images","authors":"M. Outtas, Lu Zhang, O. Déforges, W. Hamidouche, A. Serir","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although assessing post-processed medical images is still done by radiologists (rather than computers), numerous algorithms dedicated to medical image processing are developed without taking into consideration the expert's perceived quality scores. In order to evaluate these algorithms, we study in this paper four No-Reference(NR) quality assessment metrics in terms of correlation with perceived scores of experts. These scores were obtained through subjective tests conducted on ultrasound (US) livers images. Results show that one NR metric among the four evaluated performs the best for assessing the quality of US images. However, further study is needed for the development of more suitable NR metrics.","PeriodicalId":6618,"journal":{"name":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"38 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Although assessing post-processed medical images is still done by radiologists (rather than computers), numerous algorithms dedicated to medical image processing are developed without taking into consideration the expert's perceived quality scores. In order to evaluate these algorithms, we study in this paper four No-Reference(NR) quality assessment metrics in terms of correlation with perceived scores of experts. These scores were obtained through subjective tests conducted on ultrasound (US) livers images. Results show that one NR metric among the four evaluated performs the best for assessing the quality of US images. However, further study is needed for the development of more suitable NR metrics.
肝脏超声图像无参考质量指标的评价
尽管评估后处理的医学图像仍然是由放射科医生(而不是计算机)完成的,但许多专门用于医学图像处理的算法都没有考虑到专家的感知质量分数。为了评估这些算法,我们研究了四种无参考(NR)质量评估指标与专家感知得分的相关性。这些分数是通过对超声(US)肝脏图像进行主观测试获得的。结果表明,在评估的四个NR指标中,一个NR指标对评估美国图像的质量表现最好。然而,需要进一步的研究来制定更合适的NR指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信