Audit Partners' Co-Working Experience and Audit Outcomes

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ting‐Chiao Huang, Chen Chen, S. Kaplan, Yi‐Hung Lin
{"title":"Audit Partners' Co-Working Experience and Audit Outcomes","authors":"Ting‐Chiao Huang, Chen Chen, S. Kaplan, Yi‐Hung Lin","doi":"10.2308/AJPT-18-163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We examine whether increases in co-working experience between the lead and concurring audit partners affect engagement audit quality and audit efficiency. We define co-working experience as the lead and concurring audit partners having worked together in these roles on previous audit engagements for clients other than the focal client. A priori, increases in co-working experience could increase or decrease audit quality, but are expected to increase audit efficiency. Using data from Taiwan, where the identities of lead and concurring audit partners are known, we find that co-working experience is positively associated with audit quality and audit efficiency. Further, the effects of co-working experience on audit quality and audit efficiency are more pronounced when co-working experience is more intensive, the two partners are more accessible to each other, the audit firm is less experienced with the client or less knowledgeable about the client's industry, or client audit risks are higher.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the sources cited in the text.\n JEL Classifications: M4; M42.","PeriodicalId":48142,"journal":{"name":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","volume":"20 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-18-163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We examine whether increases in co-working experience between the lead and concurring audit partners affect engagement audit quality and audit efficiency. We define co-working experience as the lead and concurring audit partners having worked together in these roles on previous audit engagements for clients other than the focal client. A priori, increases in co-working experience could increase or decrease audit quality, but are expected to increase audit efficiency. Using data from Taiwan, where the identities of lead and concurring audit partners are known, we find that co-working experience is positively associated with audit quality and audit efficiency. Further, the effects of co-working experience on audit quality and audit efficiency are more pronounced when co-working experience is more intensive, the two partners are more accessible to each other, the audit firm is less experienced with the client or less knowledgeable about the client's industry, or client audit risks are higher. Data Availability: Data are available from the sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M4; M42.
审计合伙人的共同工作经验和审计结果
我们研究了领导审计合伙人和并行审计合伙人之间共同工作经验的增加是否会影响审计业务的审计质量和审计效率。我们将“共同工作经验”定义为领导和合作的审计合伙人,他们曾在重点客户以外的其他客户的审计业务中以这些角色共同工作。首先,共同工作经验的增加可能会提高或降低审计质量,但预计会提高审计效率。利用台湾的数据,我们发现共同工作经验与审计质量和审计效率呈正相关。此外,当共同工作经验更密集、合伙人之间更容易接触、审计事务所对客户的经验更少或对客户所在行业的了解更少、或客户审计风险更高时,共同工作经验对审计质量和审计效率的影响更为显著。数据可用性:数据可从文中引用的来源获得。JEL分类:M4;M42。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AUDITING contains technical articles as well as news and reports on current activities of the association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信