Predicting the Working Time of Microtasks Based on Workers' Perception of Prediction Errors

Susumu Saito, Chun-Wei Chiang, Saiph Savage, Teppei Nakano, Tetsunori Kobayashi, Jeffrey P. Bigham
{"title":"Predicting the Working Time of Microtasks Based on Workers' Perception of Prediction Errors","authors":"Susumu Saito, Chun-Wei Chiang, Saiph Savage, Teppei Nakano, Tetsunori Kobayashi, Jeffrey P. Bigham","doi":"10.15346/hc.v6i1.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowd workers struggle to earn adequate wages. Given the limited task-related information provided on crowd platforms, workers often fail to estimate how long it would take to complete certain microtasks. Although there exist a few third-party tools and online communities that provide estimates of working times, such information is limited to microtasks that have been previously completed by other workers, and such tasks are usually booked immediately by experienced workers. This paper presents a computational technique for predicting microtask working times (i.e., how much time it takes to complete microtasks) based on past experiences of workers regarding similar tasks. The following two challenges were addressed during development of the proposed predictive model --- (i) collection of sufficient training data labeled with accurate working times, and (ii) evaluation and optimization of the prediction model. The paper first describes how 7,303 microtask submission data records were collected using a web browser extension --- installed by 83 Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) workers --- created for characterization of the diversity of worker behavior to facilitate accurate recording of working times. Next, challenges encountered in defining evaluation and/or objective functions have been described based on the tolerance demonstrated by workers with regard to prediction errors. To this end, surveys were conducted in AMT asking workers how they felt regarding prediction errors in working times pertaining to microtasks simulated using an \"imaginary\" AI system. Based on 91,060 survey responses submitted by 875 workers, objective/evaluation functions were derived for use in the prediction model to reflect whether or not the calculated prediction errors would be tolerated by workers. Evaluation results based on worker perceptions of prediction errors revealed that the proposed model was capable of predicting worker-tolerable working times in 73.6% of all tested microtask cases. Further, the derived objective function contributed to realization of accurate predictions across microtasks with more diverse durations.","PeriodicalId":92785,"journal":{"name":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","volume":"800 1","pages":"192-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v6i1.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Crowd workers struggle to earn adequate wages. Given the limited task-related information provided on crowd platforms, workers often fail to estimate how long it would take to complete certain microtasks. Although there exist a few third-party tools and online communities that provide estimates of working times, such information is limited to microtasks that have been previously completed by other workers, and such tasks are usually booked immediately by experienced workers. This paper presents a computational technique for predicting microtask working times (i.e., how much time it takes to complete microtasks) based on past experiences of workers regarding similar tasks. The following two challenges were addressed during development of the proposed predictive model --- (i) collection of sufficient training data labeled with accurate working times, and (ii) evaluation and optimization of the prediction model. The paper first describes how 7,303 microtask submission data records were collected using a web browser extension --- installed by 83 Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) workers --- created for characterization of the diversity of worker behavior to facilitate accurate recording of working times. Next, challenges encountered in defining evaluation and/or objective functions have been described based on the tolerance demonstrated by workers with regard to prediction errors. To this end, surveys were conducted in AMT asking workers how they felt regarding prediction errors in working times pertaining to microtasks simulated using an "imaginary" AI system. Based on 91,060 survey responses submitted by 875 workers, objective/evaluation functions were derived for use in the prediction model to reflect whether or not the calculated prediction errors would be tolerated by workers. Evaluation results based on worker perceptions of prediction errors revealed that the proposed model was capable of predicting worker-tolerable working times in 73.6% of all tested microtask cases. Further, the derived objective function contributed to realization of accurate predictions across microtasks with more diverse durations.
基于预测误差感知的微任务工作时间预测
群众工人努力赚取足够的工资。由于众筹平台上提供的任务相关信息有限,员工往往无法估计完成某些微任务需要多长时间。虽然有一些第三方工具和在线社区可以提供工作时间的估计,但这些信息仅限于以前由其他工作人员完成的微任务,并且这些任务通常由经验丰富的工作人员立即预订。本文提出了一种计算技术来预测微任务的工作时间(即,完成微任务需要多少时间)基于工人过去的经验关于类似的任务。在提出的预测模型的开发过程中,解决了以下两个挑战:(i)收集足够的训练数据,标记准确的工作时间,以及(ii)评估和优化预测模型。本文首先描述了如何使用网络浏览器扩展收集7303个微任务提交数据记录——由83名亚马逊土耳其机械(AMT)工人安装——这是为了描述工人行为的多样性而创建的,以促进准确记录工作时间。接下来,在定义评估和/或目标函数时遇到的挑战已经根据工人对预测误差的容忍度进行了描述。为此,AMT进行了调查,询问工人对使用“假想”人工智能系统模拟的微任务的工作时间预测误差的看法。根据875名工人提交的91,060份调查回复,导出了用于预测模型的客观/评价函数,以反映计算出的预测误差是否会被工人所容忍。基于工人对预测误差感知的评估结果显示,在所有测试的微任务案例中,所提出的模型能够预测73.6%的工人可容忍的工作时间。此外,导出的目标函数有助于实现具有更多不同持续时间的微任务的准确预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信