Herbarium specimens reveal the exchange network of British and Irish botanists, 1856–1932

Q. Groom, C. O’Reilly, T. Humphrey
{"title":"Herbarium specimens reveal the exchange network of British and Irish botanists, 1856–1932","authors":"Q. Groom, C. O’Reilly, T. Humphrey","doi":"10.1179/2042349714Y.0000000041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The labels on herbarium specimens hold information on the plant collected, but also on the botanist. Recent digitisation allows these data to be used for many types of investigation, including study of the botanists themselves. As a proof of concept, we reconstructed prosopographical networks of botanical exchange that existed in Britain and Ireland in the nineteenth and twentieth century and investigate the nature of these networks and their actors. Data from British Herbaria digitised on Herbaria@home were used to create network diagrams from the names of collectors, determiners, communicators and curators mentioned on herbarium specimens collected from 1856 to 1932. Data from herbarium specimens credibly reconstructed botanical exchange networks. These networks provided metrics on the actors in botanical exchange and can be used to quantify the role of different categories of actor. The botanical networks of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century were shown to be highly connected and despite the existence of two exchange clubs during part of this period the network was not divided. Herbarium specimens are a useful resource for botanical scientometrics; revealing scientific links between botanists that are not visible in correspondence, citation and co-authorship networks. Further digitisation of herbarium specimens coupled with openness of the data will further facilitate our understanding of how botanists work.","PeriodicalId":19229,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of Botany","volume":"3 1","pages":"103 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/2042349714Y.0000000041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Abstract The labels on herbarium specimens hold information on the plant collected, but also on the botanist. Recent digitisation allows these data to be used for many types of investigation, including study of the botanists themselves. As a proof of concept, we reconstructed prosopographical networks of botanical exchange that existed in Britain and Ireland in the nineteenth and twentieth century and investigate the nature of these networks and their actors. Data from British Herbaria digitised on Herbaria@home were used to create network diagrams from the names of collectors, determiners, communicators and curators mentioned on herbarium specimens collected from 1856 to 1932. Data from herbarium specimens credibly reconstructed botanical exchange networks. These networks provided metrics on the actors in botanical exchange and can be used to quantify the role of different categories of actor. The botanical networks of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century were shown to be highly connected and despite the existence of two exchange clubs during part of this period the network was not divided. Herbarium specimens are a useful resource for botanical scientometrics; revealing scientific links between botanists that are not visible in correspondence, citation and co-authorship networks. Further digitisation of herbarium specimens coupled with openness of the data will further facilitate our understanding of how botanists work.
植物标本室的标本揭示了1856-1932年间英国和爱尔兰植物学家的交流网络
植物标本馆标本上的标签既包含了所采集植物的信息,也包含了植物学家的信息。最近的数字化使这些数据可以用于许多类型的调查,包括对植物学家本身的研究。为了证明这一概念,我们重建了19世纪和20世纪存在于英国和爱尔兰的植物交换的形态网络,并调查了这些网络的性质及其参与者。在Herbaria@home上数字化的英国植物标本馆的数据被用来根据1856年至1932年收集的植物标本馆标本上提到的收藏家、测定者、传播者和策展人的名字创建网络图。植物标本室标本的数据可靠地重建了植物交换网络。这些网络提供了植物交换中行动者的度量,并可用于量化不同类别行动者的作用。19世纪末和20世纪初的植物学网络被证明是高度联系的,尽管在这一时期存在两个交换俱乐部,但这个网络并没有分裂。植物标本馆标本是植物科学计量学的重要资源;揭示植物学家之间的科学联系,这些联系在通信、引用和合著网络中是不可见的。植物标本室标本的进一步数字化,加上数据的开放,将进一步促进我们对植物学家工作方式的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信