How well do linear and nonlinear time series models’ forecasts compete with international economic organizations?

Tayyab Raza Fraz, J. Iqbal, Mudassir Uddin
{"title":"How well do linear and nonlinear time series models’ forecasts compete with international economic organizations?","authors":"Tayyab Raza Fraz, J. Iqbal, Mudassir Uddin","doi":"10.22547/ber/12.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper evaluates the forecasting performance of linear and non-linear time series models of some macroeconomic variables viz a viz the forecasts outlook of these variables generated by professionals in international economic organizations i.e. the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Many time series and econometrics models are used to forecast financial and macroeconomic variables. The accuracy of such forecasts depends crucially on careful handling of nonlinearity present in the time series. The debate of forecasting ability of linear vs nonlinear models is far from settled. These models use the past patterns of the economic time series to infer the parameters of the underlying stochastic process and use them to make forecasts. In doing so these models use only the information contained in the past data. However the economists working in professional international economic organizations not only look at the past trends but use the condition of local and global economy prevailing at the time and expected future path of economies as well as their professional expertise and judgment to arrive at forecasts of macroeconomic variables. However the specific underlying models and methodology used by the economists generating these forecast is usually not communicated to the public. In comparison to the forecasts of these organizations the time series models are well developed and accessible to researchers working anywhere around the globe. Thus it is an interesting task to compare the foresting ability of linear and nonlinear time series models. This paper aims at comparing the forecasts from these models to assess how well they compete with forecasts generated from the professional economists employed by international economic organizations. The nonlinear models employed in this study are quite well known namely the Self Exciting Threshold Autoregressive (SETAR) model and the Markov Switching Autoregressive (MSAR) model. The linear models employed are the AR and ARMA models. The paper have used annual data of three macroeconomic time series variables GDP growth, consumer price inflation and exchange rate of G7 countries i.e. Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom (UK) and United States of America (USA) as well as an emerging south Asian economy namely Pakistan. Three forecast accuracy criteria i.e. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) are employed and the statistical significance of difference in forecasts is assessed using the Diebold-Mariono test. The results show that the forecasting ability of nonlinear Regime Switching models SETAR and MSAR is superior to the linear models. Further, although the point forecasts of linear and nonlinear models are not superior to that of economic organizations but in more than 60 percent of the cases considered the forecasting accuracy of two sets of forecast is not statistically significantly different.","PeriodicalId":80398,"journal":{"name":"Akron business and economic review","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akron business and economic review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22547/ber/12.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper evaluates the forecasting performance of linear and non-linear time series models of some macroeconomic variables viz a viz the forecasts outlook of these variables generated by professionals in international economic organizations i.e. the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Many time series and econometrics models are used to forecast financial and macroeconomic variables. The accuracy of such forecasts depends crucially on careful handling of nonlinearity present in the time series. The debate of forecasting ability of linear vs nonlinear models is far from settled. These models use the past patterns of the economic time series to infer the parameters of the underlying stochastic process and use them to make forecasts. In doing so these models use only the information contained in the past data. However the economists working in professional international economic organizations not only look at the past trends but use the condition of local and global economy prevailing at the time and expected future path of economies as well as their professional expertise and judgment to arrive at forecasts of macroeconomic variables. However the specific underlying models and methodology used by the economists generating these forecast is usually not communicated to the public. In comparison to the forecasts of these organizations the time series models are well developed and accessible to researchers working anywhere around the globe. Thus it is an interesting task to compare the foresting ability of linear and nonlinear time series models. This paper aims at comparing the forecasts from these models to assess how well they compete with forecasts generated from the professional economists employed by international economic organizations. The nonlinear models employed in this study are quite well known namely the Self Exciting Threshold Autoregressive (SETAR) model and the Markov Switching Autoregressive (MSAR) model. The linear models employed are the AR and ARMA models. The paper have used annual data of three macroeconomic time series variables GDP growth, consumer price inflation and exchange rate of G7 countries i.e. Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom (UK) and United States of America (USA) as well as an emerging south Asian economy namely Pakistan. Three forecast accuracy criteria i.e. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) are employed and the statistical significance of difference in forecasts is assessed using the Diebold-Mariono test. The results show that the forecasting ability of nonlinear Regime Switching models SETAR and MSAR is superior to the linear models. Further, although the point forecasts of linear and nonlinear models are not superior to that of economic organizations but in more than 60 percent of the cases considered the forecasting accuracy of two sets of forecast is not statistically significantly different.
线性和非线性时间序列模型的预测与国际经济组织的竞争有多好?
本文评价了一些宏观经济变量的线性和非线性时间序列模型的预测效果,即国际货币基金组织(IMF)和经济合作与发展组织(OECD)等国际经济组织的专业人员对这些变量的预测前景。许多时间序列和计量经济学模型被用来预测金融和宏观经济变量。这种预测的准确性主要取决于对时间序列中存在的非线性的仔细处理。关于线性模型与非线性模型预测能力的争论还远远没有解决。这些模型利用经济时间序列的过去模式来推断潜在随机过程的参数,并利用它们进行预测。在这样做时,这些模型只使用过去数据中包含的信息。然而,在专业的国际经济组织工作的经济学家不仅要看过去的趋势,而且要利用当时当地和全球经济的普遍状况以及对经济未来路径的预期,以及他们的专业知识和判断来预测宏观经济变量。然而,经济学家做出这些预测所使用的具体基本模型和方法通常不会向公众公布。与这些组织的预测相比,时间序列模型发展得很好,并且在全球任何地方工作的研究人员都可以使用。因此,比较线性和非线性时间序列模型的森林能力是一项有趣的任务。本文旨在比较这些模型的预测,以评估它们与国际经济组织雇用的专业经济学家的预测的竞争程度。本文所采用的非线性模型是众所周知的自激阈值自回归(SETAR)模型和马尔可夫切换自回归(MSAR)模型。采用的线性模型是AR和ARMA模型。本文使用了加拿大、法国、德国、意大利、日本、英国和美国等七国集团(G7)国家以及新兴南亚经济体巴基斯坦三个宏观经济时间序列变量GDP增长、消费者价格通胀和汇率的年度数据。采用均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)三个预测精度标准,采用Diebold-Mariono检验评估预测差异的统计显著性。结果表明,非线性状态切换模型SETAR和MSAR的预测能力优于线性模型。此外,虽然线性和非线性模型的点预测并不优于经济组织的点预测,但在超过60%的情况下,两组预测的预测精度在统计上没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信