Relationship Between Image Quality and Bias in 3D Echocardiographic Measures: Data From the SABRE (Southall and Brent Revisited) Study.

Lamia Al Saikhan, Chloe Park, Therese Tillin, Guy Lloyd, Jamil Mayet, Nish Chaturvedi, Alun D Hughes
{"title":"Relationship Between Image Quality and Bias in 3D Echocardiographic Measures: Data From the SABRE (Southall and Brent Revisited) Study.","authors":"Lamia Al Saikhan, Chloe Park, Therese Tillin, Guy Lloyd, Jamil Mayet, Nish Chaturvedi, Alun D Hughes","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.120.019183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Image-quality (IQ) compromises left ventricle assessment by 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). Sicker/frailer patients often have suboptimal IQ, and therefore observed associations may be biased by IQ. We investigated its effect in an observational study of older people and when IQ was modified experimentally in healthy volunteers. Methods and Results 3DE feasibility by IQ was assessed in 1294 individuals who attended the second wave of the Southall and Brent Revisited study and was compared with 2-dimensional (2D)-echocardiography feasibility in 147 individuals. Upon successful analysis, means of ejection fraction (3D-EF) and global longitudinal strain (3D-GLS) (plus 2D-EF) were compared in individuals with poor versus good IQ. In 2 studies of healthy participants, 3DE-IQ was impaired by (1) intentionally poor echocardiographic technique, and (2) use of a sheet of ultrasound-attenuating material (neoprene rubber; 2-4 mm). The feasibility was 41% (529/1294) for 3DE versus 61% (89/147) for 2D-EF, <i>P</i><0.0001. Among acceptable images (n=529), good IQ by the 2015 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging criteria was 33.6% (178/529) and 71.3% (377/529) for 3D-EF and 3D-GLS, respectively. Individuals with poor IQ had lower 3D-EF and 3D-GLS (absolute) than those with good IQ (3D-EF: 52.8±6.0% versus 55.7±5.7%, Mean-Δ -2.9 [-3.9, 1.8]; 3D-GLS: 18.6±3.2% versus 19.2±2.9%, Mean-Δ -0.6 [-1.1, 0.0]). In 2 experimental models of poor IQ (n=36 for both), mean differences were (-2.6 to -3.2) for 3D-EF and (-1.2 to -2.0) for 3D-GLS. Similar findings were found for other 3DE left ventricle volumes and strain parameters. Conclusions 3DE parameters have low feasibility and values are systematically lower in individuals with poor IQ. Although 3D-EF and 3D-GLS have potential advantages over conventional echocardiography, further technical improvements are required to improve the utility of 3DE in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":"124 1","pages":"e019183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Image-quality (IQ) compromises left ventricle assessment by 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). Sicker/frailer patients often have suboptimal IQ, and therefore observed associations may be biased by IQ. We investigated its effect in an observational study of older people and when IQ was modified experimentally in healthy volunteers. Methods and Results 3DE feasibility by IQ was assessed in 1294 individuals who attended the second wave of the Southall and Brent Revisited study and was compared with 2-dimensional (2D)-echocardiography feasibility in 147 individuals. Upon successful analysis, means of ejection fraction (3D-EF) and global longitudinal strain (3D-GLS) (plus 2D-EF) were compared in individuals with poor versus good IQ. In 2 studies of healthy participants, 3DE-IQ was impaired by (1) intentionally poor echocardiographic technique, and (2) use of a sheet of ultrasound-attenuating material (neoprene rubber; 2-4 mm). The feasibility was 41% (529/1294) for 3DE versus 61% (89/147) for 2D-EF, P<0.0001. Among acceptable images (n=529), good IQ by the 2015 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging criteria was 33.6% (178/529) and 71.3% (377/529) for 3D-EF and 3D-GLS, respectively. Individuals with poor IQ had lower 3D-EF and 3D-GLS (absolute) than those with good IQ (3D-EF: 52.8±6.0% versus 55.7±5.7%, Mean-Δ -2.9 [-3.9, 1.8]; 3D-GLS: 18.6±3.2% versus 19.2±2.9%, Mean-Δ -0.6 [-1.1, 0.0]). In 2 experimental models of poor IQ (n=36 for both), mean differences were (-2.6 to -3.2) for 3D-EF and (-1.2 to -2.0) for 3D-GLS. Similar findings were found for other 3DE left ventricle volumes and strain parameters. Conclusions 3DE parameters have low feasibility and values are systematically lower in individuals with poor IQ. Although 3D-EF and 3D-GLS have potential advantages over conventional echocardiography, further technical improvements are required to improve the utility of 3DE in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

三维超声心动图测量中图像质量与偏差的关系:来自SABRE (Southall and Brent Revisited)研究的数据。
图像质量(IQ)影响了三维超声心动图(3DE)对左心室的评估。病情较重/体弱多病的患者往往智商不佳,因此观察到的关联可能受智商的影响。我们在一项针对老年人的观察性研究中调查了它的影响,并在健康志愿者的智商实验中进行了调整。方法与结果对参加Southall和Brent复诊研究的1294例患者进行了3DE可行性评估,并与147例患者的二维超声心动图可行性进行了比较。分析成功后,比较了低智商和高智商个体的射血分数(3D-EF)和整体纵向应变(3D-GLS)(加上2D-EF)的平均值。在两项健康参与者的研究中,3DE-IQ被(1)故意不良的超声心动图技术和(2)使用一张超声波衰减材料(氯丁橡胶;2 - 4毫米)。3DE的可行性为41%(529/1294),而2D-EF的可行性为61% (89/147)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信