Disadvantaged Balkans. Trauma "Berlin Peace Treaty" in the Memory of Bulgarians and Serbs

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Evgenia V. Ivanova
{"title":"Disadvantaged Balkans. Trauma \"Berlin Peace Treaty\" in the Memory of Bulgarians and Serbs","authors":"Evgenia V. Ivanova","doi":"10.37708/bf.swu.v32i2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text further develops the author's earlier thesis about the typologies of Bulgarian and Serbian nationalism as dependent on collective memory – heroic or traumatic. And – to some extent – gets into an argument with her. The article examines the reactions of Bulgarian and Serbian society to the decisions of the Berlin Treaty (1878), which proved traumatic for both sides – regardless of the differences in the status of the one and the other. The Berlin Treaty — if it did not cause, it — legitimized four wars, became the starting point for aspirations for the redistribution of the peninsula and a source of traumatic memory. Although the subsequent victories and battles alternate with different intensity, the core elements of national identity remain the series of \"Golgotha\" (in the Serbian case) and \"national catastrophes\" (in the Bulgarian). Collective memory, of course, can undergo reversals – depending on the needs of a particular political situation and on the \"invention of tradition\" to serve this situation.","PeriodicalId":40507,"journal":{"name":"Balkanistic Forum","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkanistic Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/bf.swu.v32i2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The text further develops the author's earlier thesis about the typologies of Bulgarian and Serbian nationalism as dependent on collective memory – heroic or traumatic. And – to some extent – gets into an argument with her. The article examines the reactions of Bulgarian and Serbian society to the decisions of the Berlin Treaty (1878), which proved traumatic for both sides – regardless of the differences in the status of the one and the other. The Berlin Treaty — if it did not cause, it — legitimized four wars, became the starting point for aspirations for the redistribution of the peninsula and a source of traumatic memory. Although the subsequent victories and battles alternate with different intensity, the core elements of national identity remain the series of "Golgotha" (in the Serbian case) and "national catastrophes" (in the Bulgarian). Collective memory, of course, can undergo reversals – depending on the needs of a particular political situation and on the "invention of tradition" to serve this situation.
弱势的巴尔干半岛。保加利亚人和塞尔维亚人记忆中的创伤“柏林和平条约”
文本进一步发展了作者关于保加利亚和塞尔维亚民族主义的类型学依赖于集体记忆的早期论文-英雄或创伤。在某种程度上,和她发生了争执。本文探讨了保加利亚和塞尔维亚社会对《柏林条约》(1878年)的决定的反应,无论双方的地位如何不同,这一决定对双方都造成了创伤。《柏林条约》即使没有引起战争,也使四场战争合法化,成为重新分配半岛的愿望的起点和创伤记忆的来源。尽管随后的胜利和战斗以不同的强度交替进行,但民族认同的核心要素仍然是一系列的“各各他”(在塞尔维亚的情况下)和“国家灾难”(在保加利亚)。当然,集体记忆可以经历逆转,这取决于特定政治局势的需要和为这种局势服务的“发明传统”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Balkanistic Forum
Balkanistic Forum HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: "Balkanistic Forum" is published since 1992 as a yearly edition of the “Seminar for Balkan Studies and Specialization” to the South-Western University “Neofyt Rilski” Blagoevgrad. Since 1995 it is published in thematic issues -3 issues per year. The main task of the Journal is to provide free forum for discussing important historical and present problems of the Balkans in European and wider context. It is designed as an interdisciplinary journal uniting the efforts of specialists in History, Sociology, Literature, Anthropology, Linguistics, Culture Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书