Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) – Uncertainties and Challenges Post COVID-19

Samraj Sahay
{"title":"Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) – Uncertainties and Challenges Post COVID-19","authors":"Samraj Sahay","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3764350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper provides an overview of the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) and makes an effort to assess the challenges and uncertainties in the context of the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The narrative for the five SSPs are based on global assumptions and misses out on the country specific processes that could influence future socioeconomic trajectories. The assessment finds that the basic assumptions for macroeconomic growth - driven by human capital efficiency, no future growth disruptions and the future growth align with the historical development trajectories are vulnerable to risks posed by climate change and shocks imposed by pandemics. Also, SSPs do not factor in the sectoral contribution of agriculture, manufacturing and services which gets impacted through different channels during the pandemic and would have heterogeneous impacts across countries. The non-inclusion of disruption in projections under SSPs results in inflated growth and underestimation of vulnerability and economic loses. This is detrimental for choice of mitigation and adaptation policies and sustainable development pathways. The sudden change in internal migration due to shocks like pandemic which has essentially been an urban phenomenon and their impact on dynamics of urbanization has highlighted the importance of inclusion of migration in urbanization projection for SSPs. The uncertainties and challenges exposed by the pandemic have provided the opportunity to reassess the SSPs. There is an urgent need for a bottom-up approach of developing extended SSPs specific to the national or sub-national level and make projections by incorporating the country specific inputs in the model that are likely to be impacted by disruptions. This would provide a more realistic outcome that would be closer to the expected pathways and reduce uncertainties associated with the projections.","PeriodicalId":20373,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Health eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Health eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3764350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper provides an overview of the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) and makes an effort to assess the challenges and uncertainties in the context of the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The narrative for the five SSPs are based on global assumptions and misses out on the country specific processes that could influence future socioeconomic trajectories. The assessment finds that the basic assumptions for macroeconomic growth - driven by human capital efficiency, no future growth disruptions and the future growth align with the historical development trajectories are vulnerable to risks posed by climate change and shocks imposed by pandemics. Also, SSPs do not factor in the sectoral contribution of agriculture, manufacturing and services which gets impacted through different channels during the pandemic and would have heterogeneous impacts across countries. The non-inclusion of disruption in projections under SSPs results in inflated growth and underestimation of vulnerability and economic loses. This is detrimental for choice of mitigation and adaptation policies and sustainable development pathways. The sudden change in internal migration due to shocks like pandemic which has essentially been an urban phenomenon and their impact on dynamics of urbanization has highlighted the importance of inclusion of migration in urbanization projection for SSPs. The uncertainties and challenges exposed by the pandemic have provided the opportunity to reassess the SSPs. There is an urgent need for a bottom-up approach of developing extended SSPs specific to the national or sub-national level and make projections by incorporating the country specific inputs in the model that are likely to be impacted by disruptions. This would provide a more realistic outcome that would be closer to the expected pathways and reduce uncertainties associated with the projections.
共享的社会经济路径——COVID-19后的不确定性和挑战
本文概述了共享社会经济路径(ssp),并努力评估在COVID-19大流行造成破坏的背景下面临的挑战和不确定性。对五个可持续发展战略方案的叙述是基于全球假设的,忽略了可能影响未来社会经济轨迹的国家具体进程。评估发现,宏观经济增长的基本假设——由人力资本效率驱动、未来增长不受干扰以及未来增长符合历史发展轨迹——很容易受到气候变化和流行病冲击带来的风险的影响。此外,可持续发展战略没有考虑农业、制造业和服务业的部门贡献,这些部门在大流行期间通过不同渠道受到影响,对各国的影响也不尽相同。在ssp下的预测中不包括破坏,导致了夸大的增长和对脆弱性和经济损失的低估。这不利于选择缓解和适应政策以及可持续发展途径。由于大流行病等冲击导致的国内移徙的突然变化(基本上是一种城市现象)及其对城市化动态的影响,突出了将移徙纳入可持续发展战略方案的城市化预测的重要性。大流行病带来的不确定性和挑战为重新评估战略战略计划提供了机会。目前迫切需要一种自下而上的方法,制定针对国家或国家以下一级的扩展的可持续战略方案,并通过将可能受到中断影响的国家具体投入纳入模型来进行预测。这将提供更现实的结果,更接近预期的路径,并减少与预测有关的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信