Ecozones of road landscape-engineer systems: structure, typology, significance

IF 0.4 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hryhoriy I. Denysyk, Oksana M. Valchuk-Orkusha, V. Kanska, V. Kanskyi, I. Kozynska
{"title":"Ecozones of road landscape-engineer systems: structure, typology, significance","authors":"Hryhoriy I. Denysyk, Oksana M. Valchuk-Orkusha, V. Kanska, V. Kanskyi, I. Kozynska","doi":"10.15421/112255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nWe analyzed one of the inseparable components of road landscapes of Ukraine, their ecozones. As noted, road landscapes are divided into three categories: road landscape-en- gineer systems (RLESs), road landscape-technogenic systems (RLTSs) and road landscapes proper (RLP). Depending on those categories of road landscapes, there form respective road ecozones. Most distinctively, they become structured and developed over the process of constructing and functioning of RLESs. Therefore, the objectives of our research were the structure, typology, properties and significance of ecozones, mostly those of road landscape-engineer systems for the purpose of their rational exploitation. The objects of the research were RLESs of Ternopil-Khemel- nytskyi-Vinnytsia-Uman-Kropyvnytskyi (M-12) and Kyiv-Odesa (M-5). The research was carried out using the basic principles of landscape science – emergence, cause and effect relationships, history, comparability; methods of analysis, synthesis, modeling, map- ping, GIS-technologies using the software: graphic editors CorelDRAW and Adobe Photoshop, and also open-source network of satellite images Google Earth and other. The notion of road ecozone is considered as a complex ecological structure that is formed and developed over the process of functioning of road landscapes. In more details, we have analyzed the ecozones of modern road landscape-engineer systems M-12 and M-5 which have long been actively operating. Field landscape-science-oriented and ecological studies of ecozones of those RLESs over the period of 2019-2021 made it possible to distinguish and substantiate ten microecozones in their structure. Their specific features are conditioned by specifics of the structure and ecologic condition of previous landscape complexes – the fundamentals of modern RLESs; spatial-temporal specifics of the formation; «linear» spread; dependence on the func- tioning of one type of transport (automobile) and purpose. The features of microecozones are conditioned by land allocated to roads, technical impact, chemical contamination, contamination of soil, aquatic and air contaminations, acoustic and lighting impacts, and esthetic and landscape contaminations. Over the process of further studies, it is possible to distinguish other microecozones, specifically those of biotic and geological impacts, and also uniting certain microecozones into groups. We analyzed one of typical features of road ecozones – their asymmetry. We distinguished and characterized three types of asymmetry of road ecozones – wind-caused, orographic and landscape asymmetries. Not always do their vectors of development coincide. We should note that over the process of functioning of RLTSs and SRLs, there also develop roadside ecozones with respective set of microecozones, though they need additional studies. Further study of ecozones in road landscapes would allow for more thorough planning and forming of their structure, functioning, im- pact on human health and environment. Road landscapes of any category need to be re-constructed into a system of complex purpose – transport, scientific, recreational and esthetic. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":42282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geology Geography and Geoecology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geology Geography and Geoecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/112255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyzed one of the inseparable components of road landscapes of Ukraine, their ecozones. As noted, road landscapes are divided into three categories: road landscape-en- gineer systems (RLESs), road landscape-technogenic systems (RLTSs) and road landscapes proper (RLP). Depending on those categories of road landscapes, there form respective road ecozones. Most distinctively, they become structured and developed over the process of constructing and functioning of RLESs. Therefore, the objectives of our research were the structure, typology, properties and significance of ecozones, mostly those of road landscape-engineer systems for the purpose of their rational exploitation. The objects of the research were RLESs of Ternopil-Khemel- nytskyi-Vinnytsia-Uman-Kropyvnytskyi (M-12) and Kyiv-Odesa (M-5). The research was carried out using the basic principles of landscape science – emergence, cause and effect relationships, history, comparability; methods of analysis, synthesis, modeling, map- ping, GIS-technologies using the software: graphic editors CorelDRAW and Adobe Photoshop, and also open-source network of satellite images Google Earth and other. The notion of road ecozone is considered as a complex ecological structure that is formed and developed over the process of functioning of road landscapes. In more details, we have analyzed the ecozones of modern road landscape-engineer systems M-12 and M-5 which have long been actively operating. Field landscape-science-oriented and ecological studies of ecozones of those RLESs over the period of 2019-2021 made it possible to distinguish and substantiate ten microecozones in their structure. Their specific features are conditioned by specifics of the structure and ecologic condition of previous landscape complexes – the fundamentals of modern RLESs; spatial-temporal specifics of the formation; «linear» spread; dependence on the func- tioning of one type of transport (automobile) and purpose. The features of microecozones are conditioned by land allocated to roads, technical impact, chemical contamination, contamination of soil, aquatic and air contaminations, acoustic and lighting impacts, and esthetic and landscape contaminations. Over the process of further studies, it is possible to distinguish other microecozones, specifically those of biotic and geological impacts, and also uniting certain microecozones into groups. We analyzed one of typical features of road ecozones – their asymmetry. We distinguished and characterized three types of asymmetry of road ecozones – wind-caused, orographic and landscape asymmetries. Not always do their vectors of development coincide. We should note that over the process of functioning of RLTSs and SRLs, there also develop roadside ecozones with respective set of microecozones, though they need additional studies. Further study of ecozones in road landscapes would allow for more thorough planning and forming of their structure, functioning, im- pact on human health and environment. Road landscapes of any category need to be re-constructed into a system of complex purpose – transport, scientific, recreational and esthetic.
道路景观工程系统生态区:结构、类型、意义
我们分析了乌克兰道路景观不可分割的组成部分之一,他们的生态区。如上所述,道路景观分为三类:道路景观工程系统(RLESs)、道路景观技术系统(RLTSs)和道路景观本身(RLP)。根据这些道路景观的类别,形成了各自的道路生态区。最独特的是,它们在构建和运行RLESs的过程中变得结构化和发展。因此,我们的研究目标是生态区的结构、类型、性质和意义,主要是道路景观工程系统的研究,目的是为了合理开发生态区。研究对象为ternopili - khemel - nytsky - vinnysia - uman - kropyvnytsky (M-12)和Kyiv-Odesa (M-5)的RLESs。本研究运用景观科学的基本原则:发生、因果关系、历史、可比性;分析方法、综合方法、建模方法、制图方法、gis技术使用的软件:图形编辑器CorelDRAW和Adobe Photoshop,以及开源网络卫星图像Google Earth等。道路生态区的概念被认为是在道路景观功能过程中形成和发展的复杂生态结构。详细分析了长期以来积极运行的现代道路景观工程系统M-12和M-5的生态区。通过2019-2021年的野外景观科学和生态研究,区分和证实了10个微生态区的结构。它们的具体特征取决于以往景观综合体的具体结构和生态条件——这是现代RLESs的基础;形成的时空特征;“线性”传播;依赖于一种交通工具(汽车)的功能和目的。微生态区的特征取决于分配给道路的土地、技术影响、化学污染、土壤污染、水生和空气污染、声学和照明影响以及美学和景观污染。在进一步的研究过程中,有可能区分其他微生态带,特别是那些受到生物和地质影响的微生态带,并将某些微生态带合并成组。分析了道路生态区的一个典型特征——不对称性。对道路生态区的三种不对称类型进行了区分和表征:风致不对称、地形不对称和景观不对称。它们的发展方向并不总是一致的。值得注意的是,在道路交通安全区域和道路交通安全区域的功能发展过程中,路边生态区也会形成相应的微生态区,但它们还需要进一步的研究。进一步研究道路景观中的生态区,将有助于更彻底地规划和形成其结构、功能、对人类健康和环境的影响。任何类型的道路景观都需要重新构建成一个复杂的目的系统-交通,科学,娱乐和审美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geology Geography and Geoecology
Journal of Geology Geography and Geoecology GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
40.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信