Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guidance Breast-Conserving Surgery in Early Breast Cancer

Tin Smm, Cheema I, Kurup V, Viswanath Yks, Razdan S
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guidance Breast-Conserving Surgery in Early Breast Cancer","authors":"Tin Smm, Cheema I, Kurup V, Viswanath Yks, Razdan S","doi":"10.26420/AUSTINJSURG.2021.1267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of intra-operative ultrasound guided breast-conserving surgery in early breast cancer. Background: Breast Conservation (BCS) is the standard surgical procedure for early breast cancer. It is challenging for surgeons to achieve adequate excision of the lesion with clear margins and acceptable cosmesis. A continuous Intra-Operative Ultrasound (IOUS) is used during BCS in volume precision surgery. We reviewed its effectiveness to obtain clear margins, low excision volume and better cosmetic outcome during BCS. Methods: We searched three bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library online) for relevant published and unpublished literature from their inception until December 2019. The randomized controlled trials of the impact of IOUS on excision volume, margin status and cosmetic outcome was assessed, and meta-analysis carried out for margin status with narrative summary was done for other results. Results: This study included four articles in the systematic review. A total of 207 patients with IOUS and 192 patients with Palpation Guided (PGS) BCS was studied in this review. The standardised mean difference of excision volume for 2 trials was -0.31 (-0.62, -0.00) and -0.50 (-0.85, -0.16) with p-value of 0.048 and 0.004. There was no significant volume difference in the remaining two studies. The positive margin rate reduced significantly with IOUS guidance with the pooled OR was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.41) with no heterogeneity among studies (p=0.72, I2= 0%). The overall cosmetic outcome favoured satisfaction in both ultrasound-guided and palpation guided BCS groups without significant difference. Conclusion: This study suggests that the use of IOUS provides a statistically significant, less positive margin without a considerable difference in excisional volume. Overall, satisfaction exceeds dissatisfaction with ultrasound-guided Breast-conserving surgery. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the better cosmetic outcome in the IOUS group.","PeriodicalId":91056,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of surgery","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJSURG.2021.1267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of intra-operative ultrasound guided breast-conserving surgery in early breast cancer. Background: Breast Conservation (BCS) is the standard surgical procedure for early breast cancer. It is challenging for surgeons to achieve adequate excision of the lesion with clear margins and acceptable cosmesis. A continuous Intra-Operative Ultrasound (IOUS) is used during BCS in volume precision surgery. We reviewed its effectiveness to obtain clear margins, low excision volume and better cosmetic outcome during BCS. Methods: We searched three bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library online) for relevant published and unpublished literature from their inception until December 2019. The randomized controlled trials of the impact of IOUS on excision volume, margin status and cosmetic outcome was assessed, and meta-analysis carried out for margin status with narrative summary was done for other results. Results: This study included four articles in the systematic review. A total of 207 patients with IOUS and 192 patients with Palpation Guided (PGS) BCS was studied in this review. The standardised mean difference of excision volume for 2 trials was -0.31 (-0.62, -0.00) and -0.50 (-0.85, -0.16) with p-value of 0.048 and 0.004. There was no significant volume difference in the remaining two studies. The positive margin rate reduced significantly with IOUS guidance with the pooled OR was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.41) with no heterogeneity among studies (p=0.72, I2= 0%). The overall cosmetic outcome favoured satisfaction in both ultrasound-guided and palpation guided BCS groups without significant difference. Conclusion: This study suggests that the use of IOUS provides a statistically significant, less positive margin without a considerable difference in excisional volume. Overall, satisfaction exceeds dissatisfaction with ultrasound-guided Breast-conserving surgery. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the better cosmetic outcome in the IOUS group.
术中超声引导保乳手术对早期乳腺癌影响的系统评价与meta分析
术中超声引导保乳手术对早期乳腺癌影响的系统回顾和meta分析。背景:乳房保护(BCS)是早期乳腺癌的标准手术方法。对于外科医生来说,要做到充分切除边缘清晰、外形美观的病变是一项挑战。连续术中超声(IOUS)用于BCS的体积精确手术。我们回顾了其在BCS中获得清晰的边缘,低切除量和更好的美容效果的有效性。方法:我们检索了三个书目数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、Cochrane Library online),检索了从数据库建立到2019年12月的相关已发表和未发表的文献。评估白条对切除量、切缘状态和美容结果影响的随机对照试验,对切缘状态进行meta分析,对其他结果进行叙述性总结。结果:本研究纳入系统综述4篇。本研究共对207例欠条患者和192例触诊引导(PGS) BCS患者进行了研究。2个试验的标准化平均切除量差分别为-0.31(-0.62,-0.00)和-0.50 (-0.85,-0.16),p值分别为0.048和0.004。在剩下的两项研究中没有明显的体积差异。在白条指导下,阳性边际率显著降低,合并OR为0.19 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.41),研究间无异质性(p=0.72, I2= 0%)。超声引导和触诊引导的BCS组总体美容效果满意,无显著差异。结论:本研究表明,使用欠条提供了一个统计上显著的,较少的阳性边缘,但在切除体积上没有显着的差异。总体而言,超声引导下保乳手术的满意度大于不满意度。然而,没有足够的证据支持白条组有更好的美容效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信