Speeding up the clinical pathways by accessing emergency departments.

The European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2020-02-01 Epub Date: 2019-08-31 DOI:10.1007/s10198-019-01107-5
Rosella Levaggi, Marcello Montefiori, Luca Persico
{"title":"Speeding up the clinical pathways by accessing emergency departments.","authors":"Rosella Levaggi, Marcello Montefiori, Luca Persico","doi":"10.1007/s10198-019-01107-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inappropriate emergency admissions create overcrowding and may reduce the quality of emergency care. In Italy, overcrowding is further exacerbated by patients who use emergency admissions as a shortcut to avoid the general practitioner (GP) gateway. In this paper, we investigate access to emergency departments (EDs) by patients with non-severe medical conditions and their willingness to wait. Population data for ED accesses in Liguria (an Italian administrative region) in 2016 were used to estimate the number of strategic accesses and waiting time elasticities of low-severity patients. Our results show that the practice of using EDs to skip gatekeeping is a serious problem. The percentage of patients who engage in such practice vary from 8.7 to 9.9% of non-urgent patients; they generally prefer to access more specialized hospitals, especially during weekdays, when GPs are available, but hospitals run at full capacity. Strategic patients are usually much younger than average. From a policy point of view, our results show that long waits may discourage \"genuine\" patients rather than strategic ones. It is necessary to develop a system to improve access to patients mainly requiring specialist care, along with enhancing the management of diagnostic examinations through primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":22450,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Health Economics","volume":"20 1","pages":"37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01107-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inappropriate emergency admissions create overcrowding and may reduce the quality of emergency care. In Italy, overcrowding is further exacerbated by patients who use emergency admissions as a shortcut to avoid the general practitioner (GP) gateway. In this paper, we investigate access to emergency departments (EDs) by patients with non-severe medical conditions and their willingness to wait. Population data for ED accesses in Liguria (an Italian administrative region) in 2016 were used to estimate the number of strategic accesses and waiting time elasticities of low-severity patients. Our results show that the practice of using EDs to skip gatekeeping is a serious problem. The percentage of patients who engage in such practice vary from 8.7 to 9.9% of non-urgent patients; they generally prefer to access more specialized hospitals, especially during weekdays, when GPs are available, but hospitals run at full capacity. Strategic patients are usually much younger than average. From a policy point of view, our results show that long waits may discourage "genuine" patients rather than strategic ones. It is necessary to develop a system to improve access to patients mainly requiring specialist care, along with enhancing the management of diagnostic examinations through primary care.

通过进入急诊科加快临床路径。
不适当的急诊入院会造成人满为患,并可能降低急诊护理的质量。在意大利,病人把急诊作为避开全科医生的捷径,这进一步加剧了人满为患的情况。在本文中,我们调查了非严重疾病患者进入急诊科(EDs)的情况和他们的等待意愿。利用意大利利古里亚(Liguria) 2016年急诊科就诊人口数据,估算低危患者战略就诊次数和等待时间弹性。我们的研究结果表明,使用电子邮件跳过把关的做法是一个严重的问题。从事这种做法的患者比例从非紧急患者的8.7%到9.9%不等;他们通常更愿意去更专业的医院,特别是在工作日,当全科医生有空时,但医院满负荷运转。有策略的病人通常比一般人年轻得多。从政策的角度来看,我们的研究结果表明,长时间的等待可能会让“真正的”病人气馁,而不是让那些有策略的病人泄气。有必要建立一个系统,改善对主要需要专科护理的患者的可及性,同时通过初级保健加强对诊断检查的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书