Efficiency of banks in Malaysia: A super efficiency approach

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
M. M. Kasim, Razamin Ramli, Md. Azizul Baten, J. Jamil, Mushtaq Taleb
{"title":"Efficiency of banks in Malaysia: A super efficiency approach","authors":"M. M. Kasim, Razamin Ramli, Md. Azizul Baten, J. Jamil, Mushtaq Taleb","doi":"10.5755/j01.ee.30.4.19291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stability of the economic system of a country very much depends on its banking industry. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been applied widely for measuring efficiency of banks. Limited studies, however, have employed the radial and non-radial DEA models to evaluate efficiency of banks without considering the ranking of the fully efficient banks since those banks have the same efficiency score. Considering the weakness of the radial and non-radial DEA, this paper aims to calculate the banks efficiency of nine commercial banks in Malaysia from 2004 to 2013 by adopting the two-stage of super efficiency slack-based measure (SE-SBM) model. This model can discriminate between the efficient banks and recalculate their efficiency scores. Then, the selected banks were able to be ranked according to their final efficiency scores. Moreover, comparative analyses of the efficiency of the banks and the year-wise efficiency of the selected banks were also conducted. The methodology consists of two stages.  In the first stage the SBM model is run to classify efficient and inefficient banks. In the second stage the super efficiency model is run to rank the efficient banks obtained from the first stage by calculating their super efficiency scores. Our empirical results show that: (1) the efficiency status of the banks fluctuated over the examined period, the high number of the efficient banks is achieved in the years 2006 and 2008, while the year 2012 has the lowest number of the efficient banks. (2) the ranking of the banks fluctuated in the studied period. (3) most of the banks are inefficient in terms of their average efficiency scores. This paper has two limitations. First, the paper did not integrate undesirable output, despite it deals with non-interest income. Second, performance evaluation of Malaysian commercial banks was only compared among the Malaysian banks.","PeriodicalId":46830,"journal":{"name":"Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.30.4.19291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The stability of the economic system of a country very much depends on its banking industry. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been applied widely for measuring efficiency of banks. Limited studies, however, have employed the radial and non-radial DEA models to evaluate efficiency of banks without considering the ranking of the fully efficient banks since those banks have the same efficiency score. Considering the weakness of the radial and non-radial DEA, this paper aims to calculate the banks efficiency of nine commercial banks in Malaysia from 2004 to 2013 by adopting the two-stage of super efficiency slack-based measure (SE-SBM) model. This model can discriminate between the efficient banks and recalculate their efficiency scores. Then, the selected banks were able to be ranked according to their final efficiency scores. Moreover, comparative analyses of the efficiency of the banks and the year-wise efficiency of the selected banks were also conducted. The methodology consists of two stages.  In the first stage the SBM model is run to classify efficient and inefficient banks. In the second stage the super efficiency model is run to rank the efficient banks obtained from the first stage by calculating their super efficiency scores. Our empirical results show that: (1) the efficiency status of the banks fluctuated over the examined period, the high number of the efficient banks is achieved in the years 2006 and 2008, while the year 2012 has the lowest number of the efficient banks. (2) the ranking of the banks fluctuated in the studied period. (3) most of the banks are inefficient in terms of their average efficiency scores. This paper has two limitations. First, the paper did not integrate undesirable output, despite it deals with non-interest income. Second, performance evaluation of Malaysian commercial banks was only compared among the Malaysian banks.
马来西亚银行效率:一个超级效率的方法
一个国家经济体系的稳定在很大程度上取决于它的银行业。数据包络分析(DEA)在衡量银行效率方面得到了广泛的应用。然而,由于完全有效银行的效率得分相同,因此很少有研究采用径向和非径向DEA模型来评价银行的效率,而没有考虑完全有效银行的排名。考虑到径向DEA和非径向DEA的不足,本文采用两阶段超效率松弛测度(SE-SBM)模型对马来西亚9家商业银行2004 - 2013年的银行效率进行了计算。该模型可以区分效率高的银行,并重新计算其效率分数。然后,被选中的银行能够根据它们的最终效率得分进行排名。此外,还对所选银行的效率和年度效率进行了比较分析。该方法包括两个阶段。第一阶段运用SBM模型对高效银行和低效银行进行分类。第二阶段运用超效率模型对第一阶段得到的高效银行进行排名,计算其超效率得分。实证结果表明:(1)银行效率状况在研究期间存在波动,2006年和2008年效率银行数量最多,2012年效率银行数量最少。(2)银行排名在研究期内波动较大。(3)从平均效率得分来看,大多数银行效率低下。本文有两个局限性。首先,尽管本文涉及的是非利息收入,但并未纳入不良产出。第二,对马来西亚商业银行的绩效评价仅在马来西亚银行之间进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信