A Monte Carlo Comparison of rMDL, gMDL, eMDL, nMDL, AIC and BIC Under the Effect of Stochastic Variance for Asymmetric Price Transmission Linear Models

I. K. Amponsah, H. Acquah, Nathaniel K. Howard
{"title":"A Monte Carlo Comparison of rMDL, gMDL, eMDL, nMDL, AIC and BIC Under the Effect of Stochastic Variance for Asymmetric Price Transmission Linear Models","authors":"I. K. Amponsah, H. Acquah, Nathaniel K. Howard","doi":"10.1109/ICMRSISIIT46373.2020.9405933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stochastic variance or amount of noise has influenced Information-Theoretic Fit Criteria’s (ITFC) ability to recover the true DGP or select the optimal Asymmetric Price Transmission (APT) linear model among candidate ones. This study introduces variants of the Minimum Description Length criterion to APT modelling framework through a 1000 Monte Carlo simulations using a sample of 150 and compares them to the performances of widely used AIC and BIC. Results indicate that the performance of all criteria deteriorates with increasing noise across both standard and complex APT models. At higher noise level (3), eMDL and gMDL are alternatives to AIC which recovered strongest while nMDL is superior to all other criteria in recovering the true standard and complex models, respectively. The eMDL and gMDL outperformed all criteria (standard models) whilst nMDL and rMDL also outperformed all criteria (complex models) when the noise level was moderate (2). Lastly, at a lower noise level (1), rMDL was comparable to BIC which recovered strongest whiles nMDL is an alternative to AIC which was superior for the standard and complex models, respectively. Lower noise improves the performance of model selection methods in their ability to recover the true data generating process.","PeriodicalId":64877,"journal":{"name":"遥感信息","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"遥感信息","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMRSISIIT46373.2020.9405933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Stochastic variance or amount of noise has influenced Information-Theoretic Fit Criteria’s (ITFC) ability to recover the true DGP or select the optimal Asymmetric Price Transmission (APT) linear model among candidate ones. This study introduces variants of the Minimum Description Length criterion to APT modelling framework through a 1000 Monte Carlo simulations using a sample of 150 and compares them to the performances of widely used AIC and BIC. Results indicate that the performance of all criteria deteriorates with increasing noise across both standard and complex APT models. At higher noise level (3), eMDL and gMDL are alternatives to AIC which recovered strongest while nMDL is superior to all other criteria in recovering the true standard and complex models, respectively. The eMDL and gMDL outperformed all criteria (standard models) whilst nMDL and rMDL also outperformed all criteria (complex models) when the noise level was moderate (2). Lastly, at a lower noise level (1), rMDL was comparable to BIC which recovered strongest whiles nMDL is an alternative to AIC which was superior for the standard and complex models, respectively. Lower noise improves the performance of model selection methods in their ability to recover the true data generating process.
随机方差影响下非对称价格传导线性模型rMDL、gMDL、eMDL、nMDL、AIC和BIC的蒙特卡罗比较
随机方差或噪声量会影响信息论拟合准则(ITFC)在候选模型中恢复真实DGP或选择最优不对称价格传导(APT)线性模型的能力。本研究通过使用150个样本的1000个蒙特卡罗模拟,将最小描述长度标准的变体引入APT建模框架,并将其与广泛使用的AIC和BIC的性能进行比较。结果表明,在标准和复杂APT模型中,所有标准的性能都随着噪声的增加而恶化。在较高的噪声水平(3)下,eMDL和gMDL是AIC恢复最强的替代方法,而nMDL在恢复真实标准模型和复杂模型方面分别优于所有其他标准。eMDL和gMDL优于所有标准(标准模型),而nMDL和rMDL在噪声水平适中时也优于所有标准(复杂模型)(2)。最后,在较低的噪声水平(1)下,rMDL与BIC相当,恢复最强,而nMDL是AIC的替代品,分别优于标准模型和复杂模型。低噪声提高了模型选择方法恢复真实数据生成过程的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3984
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing Information is a bimonthly academic journal supervised by the Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China and sponsored by China Academy of Surveying and Mapping Science. Since its inception in 1986, it has been one of the authoritative journals in the field of remote sensing in China.In 2014, it was recognised as one of the first batch of national academic journals, and was awarded the honours of Core Journals of China Science Citation Database, Chinese Core Journals, and Core Journals of Science and Technology of China. The journal won the Excellence Award (First Prize) of the National Excellent Surveying, Mapping and Geographic Information Journal Award in 2011 and 2017 respectively. Remote Sensing Information is dedicated to reporting the cutting-edge theoretical and applied results of remote sensing science and technology, promoting academic exchanges at home and abroad, and promoting the application of remote sensing science and technology and industrial development. The journal adheres to the principles of openness, fairness and professionalism, abides by the anonymous review system of peer experts, and has good social credibility. The main columns include Review, Theoretical Research, Innovative Applications, Special Reports, International News, Famous Experts' Forum, Geographic National Condition Monitoring, etc., covering various fields such as surveying and mapping, forestry, agriculture, geology, meteorology, ocean, environment, national defence and so on. Remote Sensing Information aims to provide a high-level academic exchange platform for experts and scholars in the field of remote sensing at home and abroad, to enhance academic influence, and to play a role in promoting and supporting the protection of natural resources, green technology innovation, and the construction of ecological civilisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信