Value of colposcopy screening independently for cervical lesions in basic hospitals

Q4 Medicine
Gong Yuan, Huimin Zhang, Fei Gou, Jun Wang, Caihong Liu, Donglin Li
{"title":"Value of colposcopy screening independently for cervical lesions in basic hospitals","authors":"Gong Yuan, Huimin Zhang, Fei Gou, Jun Wang, Caihong Liu, Donglin Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-1372.2020.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate the value of colposcopy screening independently for cervical lesions in basic hospitals. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 574 patients who both underwent colposcopy and had pathologic results in our department. The consistency, authenticity and predictability of colposcopy and pathological results, the relevant factors affecting the accuracy of colposcopy diagnosis, and the analysis of unsatisfactory colposcopy results were analyzed. Results Agreement between colposcopic diagnosis and cervical pathology was 50.57%, and Kappa value of consistency was 0.358 (P<0.01). Agreement within one grade was 91.38 % (Kappa value was 0.871, P<0.01). The sensitivity of colposcopy in diagnosing of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and above was high (96.91%), while the specificity was 52.60% (81/154); False positive rate was 47.40%, and false negative rate was 3.09%. The sensitivity of colposcopy in diagnosing of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and above was 81.82% (153/187), and the specificity in diagnosing of LSIL and below was 90.68% (146/161); False positive rate was 9.3%, and false negative rate was 18.2%. The stage of cervical cancer and skills of colposcopist would be factors that influence the accuracy of colposcopy screening in HSIL and above (P<0.01). Average age in unsatisfactory colposcopy was (52±9)y, which was significantly different from satisfactory colposcopy cases (P<0.01). The proportion of early cervical lesions in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy HSIL or above was high. Conclusions The complete coincidence rate between colposcopy and pathological diagnosis is limited, but the consistency within one grade is good; the stage of cervical lesions and the experience of examiners are the factors related to the accuracy of colposcopy in diagnosing HSIL and above lesions; Unsatisfactory colposcopy cases can be further combined with cytology and HPV examination for shunt and treatment. Key words: Colposcopy; Uterine cervical diseases; Sensitivity and specificity","PeriodicalId":15276,"journal":{"name":"中国医师杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医师杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-1372.2020.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the value of colposcopy screening independently for cervical lesions in basic hospitals. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 574 patients who both underwent colposcopy and had pathologic results in our department. The consistency, authenticity and predictability of colposcopy and pathological results, the relevant factors affecting the accuracy of colposcopy diagnosis, and the analysis of unsatisfactory colposcopy results were analyzed. Results Agreement between colposcopic diagnosis and cervical pathology was 50.57%, and Kappa value of consistency was 0.358 (P<0.01). Agreement within one grade was 91.38 % (Kappa value was 0.871, P<0.01). The sensitivity of colposcopy in diagnosing of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and above was high (96.91%), while the specificity was 52.60% (81/154); False positive rate was 47.40%, and false negative rate was 3.09%. The sensitivity of colposcopy in diagnosing of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and above was 81.82% (153/187), and the specificity in diagnosing of LSIL and below was 90.68% (146/161); False positive rate was 9.3%, and false negative rate was 18.2%. The stage of cervical cancer and skills of colposcopist would be factors that influence the accuracy of colposcopy screening in HSIL and above (P<0.01). Average age in unsatisfactory colposcopy was (52±9)y, which was significantly different from satisfactory colposcopy cases (P<0.01). The proportion of early cervical lesions in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy HSIL or above was high. Conclusions The complete coincidence rate between colposcopy and pathological diagnosis is limited, but the consistency within one grade is good; the stage of cervical lesions and the experience of examiners are the factors related to the accuracy of colposcopy in diagnosing HSIL and above lesions; Unsatisfactory colposcopy cases can be further combined with cytology and HPV examination for shunt and treatment. Key words: Colposcopy; Uterine cervical diseases; Sensitivity and specificity
阴道镜在基层医院宫颈病变独立筛查中的价值
目的探讨阴道镜独立筛查在基层医院宫颈病变中的应用价值。方法对我科574例经阴道镜检查并有病理结果的患者进行回顾性队列研究。分析阴道镜检查结果与病理结果的一致性、真实性和可预测性,影响阴道镜诊断准确性的相关因素,以及对阴道镜检查结果不满意情况的分析。结果阴道镜诊断与宫颈病理吻合率为50.57%,一致性Kappa值为0.358 (P<0.01)。1级以内的一致性为91.38% (Kappa值为0.871,P<0.01)。阴道镜对低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)及以上的诊断敏感性高(96.91%),特异性为52.60% (81/154);假阳性率47.40%,假阴性率3.09%。阴道镜诊断高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)及以上的敏感性为81.82%(153/187),诊断低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)及以下的特异性为90.68% (146/161);假阳性率为9.3%,假阴性率为18.2%。宫颈癌分期和阴道镜医师技能是影响HSIL及以上患者阴道镜筛查准确性的因素(P<0.01)。阴道镜检查不满意组的平均年龄为(52±9)岁,与阴道镜检查满意组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。阴道镜检查不满意的HSIL及以上患者早期宫颈病变的比例较高。结论阴道镜检查与病理诊断完全符合率有限,但一级内一致性较好;宫颈病变分期和检查人员经验是影响阴道镜诊断HSIL及以上病变准确性的因素;阴道镜检查不满意的病例可进一步结合细胞学和HPV检查进行分流和治疗。关键词:阴道镜检查;子宫颈疾病;敏感性和特异性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国医师杂志
中国医师杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20937
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信