Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kediri Nomor 0457/Pdt.G /2016/PA. Kdr Tentang Perkara Ekonomi Syari’ah

Evi Nurvita Sari, Imam Annas Mushlihin, Abdullah Taufik
{"title":"Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kediri Nomor 0457/Pdt.G /2016/PA. Kdr Tentang Perkara Ekonomi Syari’ah","authors":"Evi Nurvita Sari, Imam Annas Mushlihin, Abdullah Taufik","doi":"10.35896/jse.v2i1.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Completion of the Syari'ah Economic case is the authority of the Religious Court as stated in Article 49 of Act Number 3 of 2006 concerning Judicial Power. This syari'ah economic case Number 0457 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Kdr was submitted by a Syari'ah Bank customer who felt losing because collateral was auctioned by the Syari'ah Bank through the State Wealth and Auction Service Office (KPKNL). If the auction process is carried out, the customer as the Plaintiff will suffer a large loss. On this basis the plaintiff through his legal counsel filed a lawsuit to the Kediri Religious Court. This study used a qualitative approach with normative juridical analysis of the legal documents of the decision of the Kediri Religious Court. This thesis discusses how the basis of legal considerations, the claim of the plaintiffs was declared not accepted (niet ovankelijke verklaard) and the legal implications of the Decision of the Kediri Religious Court Number 0457 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Kdr. The conclusion of the above writing is as follows: First, the basic legal considerations of the decision of the Kediri Religious Court Number 0457 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Kdr are the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1149 / K / Sip / 1975 dated 17 April 1975 jo. Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 565 / K / Sip / 1973 dated August 21, 1973, jo. verdict of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1149 / K / Sip / 1979 dated April 7, 1979 which states that the object of the claim is unclear, the claim cannot be accepted (niet ovankelijke verklaard). Second, the legal implications of the verdict are final and binding, judicially the ruling causes harm to the plaintiff, besides the principal case is not decided, the plaintiff is also burdened with court fees. \nKeywords: Juridical Analysis, Decision of the Religious Court, Syari'ah Economy.","PeriodicalId":34082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sharia Economics","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sharia Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35896/jse.v2i1.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Completion of the Syari'ah Economic case is the authority of the Religious Court as stated in Article 49 of Act Number 3 of 2006 concerning Judicial Power. This syari'ah economic case Number 0457 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Kdr was submitted by a Syari'ah Bank customer who felt losing because collateral was auctioned by the Syari'ah Bank through the State Wealth and Auction Service Office (KPKNL). If the auction process is carried out, the customer as the Plaintiff will suffer a large loss. On this basis the plaintiff through his legal counsel filed a lawsuit to the Kediri Religious Court. This study used a qualitative approach with normative juridical analysis of the legal documents of the decision of the Kediri Religious Court. This thesis discusses how the basis of legal considerations, the claim of the plaintiffs was declared not accepted (niet ovankelijke verklaard) and the legal implications of the Decision of the Kediri Religious Court Number 0457 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Kdr. The conclusion of the above writing is as follows: First, the basic legal considerations of the decision of the Kediri Religious Court Number 0457 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Kdr are the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1149 / K / Sip / 1975 dated 17 April 1975 jo. Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 565 / K / Sip / 1973 dated August 21, 1973, jo. verdict of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1149 / K / Sip / 1979 dated April 7, 1979 which states that the object of the claim is unclear, the claim cannot be accepted (niet ovankelijke verklaard). Second, the legal implications of the verdict are final and binding, judicially the ruling causes harm to the plaintiff, besides the principal case is not decided, the plaintiff is also burdened with court fees. Keywords: Juridical Analysis, Decision of the Religious Court, Syari'ah Economy.
分析宗教法庭判决0457/Pdt的管辖权。G - 2016 - PA。我们的经济状况如何
根据2006年关于司法权的第3号法令第49条规定,完成伊斯兰经济案件是宗教法院的权威。这个伊斯兰经济案例编号0457 / Pdt。G / 2016 / pa。Kdr是由一名伊斯兰银行的客户提交的,因为抵押品被伊斯兰银行通过国家财富和拍卖服务办公室(KPKNL)拍卖,他感到损失。如果进行拍卖程序,作为原告的客户将遭受巨大损失。在此基础上,原告通过其法律顾问向Kediri宗教法院提起诉讼。本研究采用定性方法,对Kediri宗教法院判决的法律文件进行规范性司法分析。本文讨论了如何根据法律考虑,原告的索赔被宣布不接受(niet ovankelijke verklaard)以及Kediri宗教法院第0457 / Pdt号决定的法律含义。G / 2016 / PA.Kdr。以上写作的结论如下:第一,Kediri宗教法院0457 / Pdt号判决的基本法律考量。G / 2016 / pa。印度尼西亚共和国最高法院于1975年4月17日颁布的第1149 / K / Sip / 1975号判例。印度尼西亚共和国最高法院于1973年8月21日第565 / K / Sip / 1973号决定。印度尼西亚共和国最高法院1979年4月7日第1149 / K / Sip / 1979号判决书,其中规定索赔的目的不明确,不能接受索赔(niet ovankelijke verklaard)。其次,判决的法律含义是终局的,具有约束力,在司法上,判决对原告造成损害,除了主案未判决外,原告还承担了诉讼费。关键词:司法分析,宗教法院判决,伊斯兰经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书