Productivity Optimization and Validation of Multistage Fracturing in a Rare Geomechanical Setting with Production Logging

G. Agrawal, Ajit Kumar, Shaktim Dutta, Apoorva Kumar, S. Pandey, A. Jha, R. Gondalia
{"title":"Productivity Optimization and Validation of Multistage Fracturing in a Rare Geomechanical Setting with Production Logging","authors":"G. Agrawal, Ajit Kumar, Shaktim Dutta, Apoorva Kumar, S. Pandey, A. Jha, R. Gondalia","doi":"10.4043/31291-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A reservoir with a rare geomechanical setting of higher stresses at shallower depths and vice versa was fractured. The multistage fracture responses were validated using production logging data. Further, production optimization was achieved by understanding the flow profile and geomechanical setting to decide on an optimal flow condition for the wells.\n An innovative solution-driven approach was identified with production logging playing a key role. Based on the geomechanical model, calculated fracture gradient indicated higher stress in the shallower section and lower stress in deeper intervals. Multistage fracturing was performed. Post fracturing, production logging was carried out in Well A at two different chokes to understand flow behavior in wellbore and correlate with reservoir response. Based on these results, an intermediate choke was selected for production logging in Well B to observe any improvement in flow behavior. An integrated study of geomechanics, fracture performance and production logging resulted in deciding an optimal flow condition for the wells.\n Results are presented for a two well operation. Production logging results indicated that deeper intervals were producing higher compared to shallower layers, thereby validating the geomechanical model. Also, fissures were encountered during deep stage fractures, indicating potentially high production from reservoir from these stages due to better flow conduit. This was also confirmed from the production logging results.\n In Well N1, production logging data, in the lower choke, indicated sluggish and unstable flow behavior with the top three stages underperforming. However, at higher choke, a steady and uniform flow was observed. The production logging results were also observed to be in line with the obtained frac-operation parameters on the higher choke. However, an anomaly was observed in the second stage of Well N1, which is estimated to be as a result of fractures closing down due to higher stresses in shallower depths.\n Based on this, an intermediate choke was selected to flow Well N2 and record production log data to observe and evaluate the flow behavior at a different choke. The flow was still observed to be sluggish and unstable at the intermediate choke. Hence, a final decision was taken based on all the different conclusions to flow the wells at higher choke to maintain optimal frac stage performance and a uniform and steady flow.\n Rare geomechanical setting of reservoirs presented challenges in accurately characterizing them. The paper recognizes the versatility of the production logging tool in delivering and understanding both reservoir response and wellbore flow conditions. The integration of fracture response with production logging results enabled validation of the reservoir response and provided valuable insights into understanding the flow behavior inside the well, and finally optimizing well productivity.","PeriodicalId":10936,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 17, 2021","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 17, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31291-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A reservoir with a rare geomechanical setting of higher stresses at shallower depths and vice versa was fractured. The multistage fracture responses were validated using production logging data. Further, production optimization was achieved by understanding the flow profile and geomechanical setting to decide on an optimal flow condition for the wells. An innovative solution-driven approach was identified with production logging playing a key role. Based on the geomechanical model, calculated fracture gradient indicated higher stress in the shallower section and lower stress in deeper intervals. Multistage fracturing was performed. Post fracturing, production logging was carried out in Well A at two different chokes to understand flow behavior in wellbore and correlate with reservoir response. Based on these results, an intermediate choke was selected for production logging in Well B to observe any improvement in flow behavior. An integrated study of geomechanics, fracture performance and production logging resulted in deciding an optimal flow condition for the wells. Results are presented for a two well operation. Production logging results indicated that deeper intervals were producing higher compared to shallower layers, thereby validating the geomechanical model. Also, fissures were encountered during deep stage fractures, indicating potentially high production from reservoir from these stages due to better flow conduit. This was also confirmed from the production logging results. In Well N1, production logging data, in the lower choke, indicated sluggish and unstable flow behavior with the top three stages underperforming. However, at higher choke, a steady and uniform flow was observed. The production logging results were also observed to be in line with the obtained frac-operation parameters on the higher choke. However, an anomaly was observed in the second stage of Well N1, which is estimated to be as a result of fractures closing down due to higher stresses in shallower depths. Based on this, an intermediate choke was selected to flow Well N2 and record production log data to observe and evaluate the flow behavior at a different choke. The flow was still observed to be sluggish and unstable at the intermediate choke. Hence, a final decision was taken based on all the different conclusions to flow the wells at higher choke to maintain optimal frac stage performance and a uniform and steady flow. Rare geomechanical setting of reservoirs presented challenges in accurately characterizing them. The paper recognizes the versatility of the production logging tool in delivering and understanding both reservoir response and wellbore flow conditions. The integration of fracture response with production logging results enabled validation of the reservoir response and provided valuable insights into understanding the flow behavior inside the well, and finally optimizing well productivity.
基于生产测井的稀有地质力学条件下多级压裂产能优化与验证
该油藏具有罕见的地质力学背景,在较浅的深度具有较高的应力,反之亦然。利用生产测井数据验证了多级裂缝响应。此外,通过了解流动剖面和地质力学设置,确定井的最佳流动条件,实现了生产优化。一种创新的解决方案驱动的方法被确定为生产日志发挥关键作用。根据地质力学模型,裂缝梯度计算结果表明,浅层段应力较高,深层段应力较低。进行了多级压裂。压裂后,在A井的两个不同的节流口进行了生产测井,以了解井筒中的流动行为,并与油藏的响应相关联。基于这些结果,我们选择了一个中间节流阀进行B井的生产测井,以观察流动特性的改善情况。通过对地质力学、压裂性能和生产测井的综合研究,确定了井的最佳流动条件。给出了两口井作业的结果。生产测井结果表明,较深的层段比较浅的层段产量更高,从而验证了地质力学模型。此外,在深层裂缝中也发现了裂缝,这表明由于更好的流动管道,这些阶段的油藏可能会有更高的产量。生产测井结果也证实了这一点。在N1井中,低节流阀段的生产测井数据显示,流体流动缓慢且不稳定,其中前三段表现不佳。然而,在较高的节流口,观察到稳定和均匀的流动。生产测井结果也与在较高节流阀上获得的压裂操作参数一致。然而,在N1井的第二阶段发现了一个异常,据估计是由于较浅深度的高应力导致裂缝关闭的结果。在此基础上,选择了一个中间节流阀对N2井进行流动,并记录了生产测井数据,以观察和评估不同节流阀下的流动行为。在中间节流阀处,仍然观察到流动缓慢和不稳定。因此,根据所有不同的结论,最终决定在更高的节流口进行压裂,以保持最佳的压裂级性能和均匀稳定的流动。罕见的储层地质力学背景给储层的准确表征带来了挑战。本文认识到生产测井工具在传递和理解油藏响应和井筒流动状况方面的通用性。将裂缝响应与生产测井结果相结合,可以验证储层响应,并为了解井内流动行为提供有价值的见解,最终优化油井产能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信