{"title":"Empowering workers and clients for organizational change, by Cohen, M. B., & Hyde, C. A.","authors":"Megan Lee","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2017.1288188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immediately, the authors, Marcia B. Cohen and Cheryl A. Hyde (2014), in Empowering Workers and Clients for Organizational Change disclose the purpose of their text: “to prepare students to engage in organizational change practice from below” (p. xiii). Its central focus is on empowering “low power” workers and clients to create organizational change. The authors start by providing the theoretical underpinnings of organizational change, offer real examples of organizational change, and conclude with three organizational change papers written by Master’s level students. The use of “force field analysis” was a central component of the practical implementation of the change effort presented. However, this text is not meant to serve as a complete guide for workers about strategies to engage in global organizational change, or how to engage diverse cultural, gender, religious, etc., groups in the process of change. The approachable language and systematic structure of the text serves as a useful source for current or recent social work graduates, and as a resource that can be frequently revisited for current practitioners. The concise and practical examples provided within will be useful to professors attempting to teach students how to concretely engage in organizational change initiatives. The text is divided into three subsections. Section I, “Key Concepts and Frameworks,” consists of chapters 1–4 and provides a general overview of the theoretical underpinnings or key concepts contextualizing organizational change. Chapter 4 introduces the central framework used throughout the text which is force field analysis. It continues with Section II, “Case Studies,” (chapters 5–11) which includes multiple examples of agencies who have effectively implemented the use of force field analysis. This subsection (with chapter 11) concludes and further emphasizes the importance of use of force field analysis as a strategy for analyzing change efforts. It also describes how one organization’s attempt at change was unsuccessful, and force field analysis was used to identify where the change effort went wrong. The text concludes with Section III, “The Student as Change Agent,” (chapters 12–14) which consists of three papers written by Master’s Social Work (MSW) students on organizational change. These latter chapters include practical implementation of the conceptual material presented in the former part of the text. I thought that there were three primary strengths that stood out in this text. The first was that the material presented was not made more complicated than necessary. The authors used an approachable writing style that was appealing to both beginning and more advanced social workers. The concepts presented in Section I were thoroughly researched as evidenced by the referenced sections noted at the end of each chapter. The authors were able to take these concepts presented and strategically apply them throughout the rest of the text. Also, the discussion questions found at the end of each chapter would be useful for professors or lay readers attempting to facilitate discussions, and they could help initiate critical thinking for students around the overall topic of empowerment. The second strength was that a variety of interesting agency examples were incorporated throughout the text. This provided practical examples of the application of the overarching force field analysis framework. Agency use of this analysis goes beyond description, and applies empowerment as an action oriented process. The examples provided illustrate how the use of this analysis by programs, or agencies, can identify specific factors and individuals that can help facilitate, or hinder, advancement of empowerment goals. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-INFORMED SOCIAL WORK 2017, VOL. 14, NO. 1, 51–52","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"1 1","pages":"51 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1288188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Immediately, the authors, Marcia B. Cohen and Cheryl A. Hyde (2014), in Empowering Workers and Clients for Organizational Change disclose the purpose of their text: “to prepare students to engage in organizational change practice from below” (p. xiii). Its central focus is on empowering “low power” workers and clients to create organizational change. The authors start by providing the theoretical underpinnings of organizational change, offer real examples of organizational change, and conclude with three organizational change papers written by Master’s level students. The use of “force field analysis” was a central component of the practical implementation of the change effort presented. However, this text is not meant to serve as a complete guide for workers about strategies to engage in global organizational change, or how to engage diverse cultural, gender, religious, etc., groups in the process of change. The approachable language and systematic structure of the text serves as a useful source for current or recent social work graduates, and as a resource that can be frequently revisited for current practitioners. The concise and practical examples provided within will be useful to professors attempting to teach students how to concretely engage in organizational change initiatives. The text is divided into three subsections. Section I, “Key Concepts and Frameworks,” consists of chapters 1–4 and provides a general overview of the theoretical underpinnings or key concepts contextualizing organizational change. Chapter 4 introduces the central framework used throughout the text which is force field analysis. It continues with Section II, “Case Studies,” (chapters 5–11) which includes multiple examples of agencies who have effectively implemented the use of force field analysis. This subsection (with chapter 11) concludes and further emphasizes the importance of use of force field analysis as a strategy for analyzing change efforts. It also describes how one organization’s attempt at change was unsuccessful, and force field analysis was used to identify where the change effort went wrong. The text concludes with Section III, “The Student as Change Agent,” (chapters 12–14) which consists of three papers written by Master’s Social Work (MSW) students on organizational change. These latter chapters include practical implementation of the conceptual material presented in the former part of the text. I thought that there were three primary strengths that stood out in this text. The first was that the material presented was not made more complicated than necessary. The authors used an approachable writing style that was appealing to both beginning and more advanced social workers. The concepts presented in Section I were thoroughly researched as evidenced by the referenced sections noted at the end of each chapter. The authors were able to take these concepts presented and strategically apply them throughout the rest of the text. Also, the discussion questions found at the end of each chapter would be useful for professors or lay readers attempting to facilitate discussions, and they could help initiate critical thinking for students around the overall topic of empowerment. The second strength was that a variety of interesting agency examples were incorporated throughout the text. This provided practical examples of the application of the overarching force field analysis framework. Agency use of this analysis goes beyond description, and applies empowerment as an action oriented process. The examples provided illustrate how the use of this analysis by programs, or agencies, can identify specific factors and individuals that can help facilitate, or hinder, advancement of empowerment goals. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-INFORMED SOCIAL WORK 2017, VOL. 14, NO. 1, 51–52
Marcia B. Cohen和Cheryl A. Hyde(2014)在《为组织变革赋予员工和客户权力》一书中立即披露了他们这篇文章的目的:“让学生为从下而上从事组织变革实践做好准备”(第13页)。它的核心重点是赋予“低权力”的员工和客户权力,以创造组织变革。作者首先提供了组织变革的理论基础,提供了组织变革的真实例子,并以硕士生撰写的三篇组织变革论文作为结论。“力场分析”的使用是所提出的变更工作的实际执行的中心组成部分。然而,本文并不意味着作为一个完整的指南,为工人的战略从事全球组织变革,或如何从事不同的文化,性别,宗教等,群体在变化的过程中。平易近人的语言和系统的文本结构为当前或最近的社会工作毕业生提供了有用的资源,并且作为当前从业者可以经常重新审视的资源。书中提供的简明而实用的例子将有助于教授们教学生如何具体地参与组织变革活动。正文分为三个小节。第一部分,“关键概念和框架”,由1-4章组成,提供了组织变革背景下的理论基础或关键概念的总体概述。第四章介绍了全文的中心框架——力场分析。第二节“个案研究”(第5-11章)继续,其中包括多个有效实施使用力场分析的机构的例子。本小节(与第11章一起)总结并进一步强调了使用力场分析作为分析变更努力的策略的重要性。它还描述了一个组织对变更的尝试是如何不成功的,并且力场分析被用来识别变更工作出错的地方。本文以第三节“作为变革推动者的学生”(第12-14章)结束,该节由社会工作硕士(MSW)学生撰写的三篇关于组织变革的论文组成。这些后面的章节包括在文本的前一部分提出的概念材料的实际实施。我认为在这篇文章中有三个主要的优势。首先,所呈现的材料没有过于复杂。作者使用平易近人的写作风格,吸引了初学者和更先进的社会工作者。第1节中提出的概念经过了彻底的研究,每一章末尾的参考章节都证明了这一点。作者能够采取这些概念提出和战略应用他们在整个文本的其余部分。此外,每章末尾的讨论问题对教授或外行读者试图促进讨论很有用,它们可以帮助学生围绕赋权的总体主题发起批判性思维。第二个优点是,在整个文本中包含了各种有趣的机构示例。这为总体力场分析框架的应用提供了实际的例子。机构对这种分析的使用超越了描述,并将授权作为一个面向行动的过程。所提供的示例说明了项目或机构如何使用这种分析来识别有助于促进或阻碍授权目标推进的特定因素和个人。《循证社会工作学报》2017年第14卷第1期。1, 51-52