Overt versus covert observations on health care providers' care and communication during antenatal care visits in Lao PDR

Sysavanh Phommachanh, D. Essink, E. Wright, J. Broerse, M. Mayxay
{"title":"Overt versus covert observations on health care providers' care and communication during antenatal care visits in Lao PDR","authors":"Sysavanh Phommachanh, D. Essink, E. Wright, J. Broerse, M. Mayxay","doi":"10.35500/JGHS.2019.1.E11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antenatal care contributes to health delivery for mother and child by identifying potential problems early and providing advice to mothers. The quality of antenatal care in Laos remains inadequate. This study aims to assess the quality of the public antenatal care service in a real life setting and to investigate differences in results between overt and covert observation as ways to identify where interventions are most needed. Methods: This health-facility based, cross-sectional observation study compared overt and covert observation to identify strong and weak points during antenatal visits. Four trained nurses and midwives assessed performance using a World Health Organization checklist. For covert observation, research assistants posed as relatives of pregnant women attending an antenatal care session. Results: One hundred and fifty-four pregnant women were analyzed. Overall performance was poor for both overt and covert observation, but the scores for most items were lower when observation was covert. Provision of health promotion was insufficient. Less than one quarter of cases were advised to eat a variety of food during pregnancy, and none of the health providers provided counseling. Communication skills, behavior and attitude of health providers were highly inadequate. Less than a quarter of pregnant women were treated with kindness and respect. Less than 10% of available information materials were used during ANC session. Overall mean (standard deviation) time-spent for each ANC session was 15.3 (4.4) minutes. Conclusion: Using covert rather than only overt observation to identify where the antenatal care needs to be improved added detailed information on where improvement is needed. The level of performance was already inadequate when health workers knew they were being observed but it declined even further on most items when they were unaware of the observation. These findings can guide efforts to improve the quality of ANC services in Laos.","PeriodicalId":93578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health science","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35500/JGHS.2019.1.E11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Antenatal care contributes to health delivery for mother and child by identifying potential problems early and providing advice to mothers. The quality of antenatal care in Laos remains inadequate. This study aims to assess the quality of the public antenatal care service in a real life setting and to investigate differences in results between overt and covert observation as ways to identify where interventions are most needed. Methods: This health-facility based, cross-sectional observation study compared overt and covert observation to identify strong and weak points during antenatal visits. Four trained nurses and midwives assessed performance using a World Health Organization checklist. For covert observation, research assistants posed as relatives of pregnant women attending an antenatal care session. Results: One hundred and fifty-four pregnant women were analyzed. Overall performance was poor for both overt and covert observation, but the scores for most items were lower when observation was covert. Provision of health promotion was insufficient. Less than one quarter of cases were advised to eat a variety of food during pregnancy, and none of the health providers provided counseling. Communication skills, behavior and attitude of health providers were highly inadequate. Less than a quarter of pregnant women were treated with kindness and respect. Less than 10% of available information materials were used during ANC session. Overall mean (standard deviation) time-spent for each ANC session was 15.3 (4.4) minutes. Conclusion: Using covert rather than only overt observation to identify where the antenatal care needs to be improved added detailed information on where improvement is needed. The level of performance was already inadequate when health workers knew they were being observed but it declined even further on most items when they were unaware of the observation. These findings can guide efforts to improve the quality of ANC services in Laos.
对老挝人民民主共和国产前保健访问期间卫生保健提供者的护理和沟通的公开与隐蔽观察
背景:产前保健通过及早发现潜在问题并向母亲提供建议,有助于母婴健康分娩。老挝的产前保健质量仍然不足。本研究旨在评估现实生活中公共产前保健服务的质量,并调查公开观察和隐蔽观察结果之间的差异,以确定最需要干预的地方。方法:这项以卫生设施为基础的横断面观察研究比较了公开观察和隐蔽观察,以确定产前检查的优缺点。四名训练有素的护士和助产士使用世界卫生组织的核对表评估绩效。为了隐蔽观察,研究助理假扮成参加产前护理会议的孕妇的亲属。结果:对154例孕妇进行了分析。公开观察和隐蔽观察的总体表现都很差,但隐蔽观察时大多数项目的得分较低。提供健康促进服务不足。不到四分之一的病例被建议在怀孕期间吃各种各样的食物,没有一个保健提供者提供咨询。保健服务提供者的沟通技巧、行为和态度严重不足。不到四分之一的孕妇受到了友善和尊重。在非洲人国民大会会议期间使用了不到10%的现有信息材料。每次ANC会议的总体平均(标准差)时间为15.3(4.4)分钟。结论:采用隐蔽而非仅仅是公开的观察方法来识别产前护理需要改进的地方,增加了需要改进的地方的详细信息。当卫生工作者知道他们受到观察时,他们的表现水平已经不足,但当他们不知道观察时,大多数项目的表现水平进一步下降。这些发现可以指导提高老挝非国大服务质量的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信