The Role of Maternity Waiting Area in Improving Obstetric Outcomes: A Comparative Cross-sectional Study, Jinka Zonal Hospital, Southern Regional State

B. Meshesha, G. Dejene, T. Hailemariam
{"title":"The Role of Maternity Waiting Area in Improving Obstetric Outcomes: A Comparative Cross-sectional Study, Jinka Zonal Hospital, Southern Regional State","authors":"B. Meshesha, G. Dejene, T. Hailemariam","doi":"10.4172/2167-0420.1000406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Maternity Waiting Areas also called Maternity Waiting Homes are residential facilities, located near a recognized medical facility, where non-laboring pregnant women from remote areas stay awaiting their delivery and be transferred to the medical facility shortly before delivery. Research indicates that 99% of all maternal mortalities occur in the developing countries. Ethiopia is a major contributor to the world-wide death of mothers. Maternity Waiting Areas, an approach designed to improve access of rural mothers to comprehensive emergency obstetric care has been introduced three decades ago in Ethiopia. Methods: Hospital-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted. Results: Only 16.7% of the total 516 mothers were admitted to the Maternity Waiting Areas of which 90.7% were from rural areas. Almost all mothers from the Maternity Waiting Areas (98.8%) delivered at the hospital with relatively reduced occurrence of the bad obstetric outcomes of interest when compared to the mothers from home. More than 53% of the mothers who reported late to labor ward were mothers from rural areas. Mothers from the Maternity Waiting Areas were 97% less likely to experience prolonged PROM when compared to the home group, AOR and 95% CI: 0.03 (0.01, 0.24). They had also 74% lesser odds of experiencing delay in admission to labor ward when in labor, AOR and 95% CI: 0.25 (0.15, 0.43). The collective bad obstetric outcomes were reduced by 27.5% from 61.2% prevalence in the home group to 33.7% in the Maternity Waiting Areas group, AOR and 95% CI: 0.32 (0.20, 0.53). Conclusion: Mothers from the Maternity Waiting Areas had been protected from the risk of intrauterine infections and thereby from maternal and perinatal complications unlike mothers from home.","PeriodicalId":17626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Womens Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Womens Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0420.1000406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background: Maternity Waiting Areas also called Maternity Waiting Homes are residential facilities, located near a recognized medical facility, where non-laboring pregnant women from remote areas stay awaiting their delivery and be transferred to the medical facility shortly before delivery. Research indicates that 99% of all maternal mortalities occur in the developing countries. Ethiopia is a major contributor to the world-wide death of mothers. Maternity Waiting Areas, an approach designed to improve access of rural mothers to comprehensive emergency obstetric care has been introduced three decades ago in Ethiopia. Methods: Hospital-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted. Results: Only 16.7% of the total 516 mothers were admitted to the Maternity Waiting Areas of which 90.7% were from rural areas. Almost all mothers from the Maternity Waiting Areas (98.8%) delivered at the hospital with relatively reduced occurrence of the bad obstetric outcomes of interest when compared to the mothers from home. More than 53% of the mothers who reported late to labor ward were mothers from rural areas. Mothers from the Maternity Waiting Areas were 97% less likely to experience prolonged PROM when compared to the home group, AOR and 95% CI: 0.03 (0.01, 0.24). They had also 74% lesser odds of experiencing delay in admission to labor ward when in labor, AOR and 95% CI: 0.25 (0.15, 0.43). The collective bad obstetric outcomes were reduced by 27.5% from 61.2% prevalence in the home group to 33.7% in the Maternity Waiting Areas group, AOR and 95% CI: 0.32 (0.20, 0.53). Conclusion: Mothers from the Maternity Waiting Areas had been protected from the risk of intrauterine infections and thereby from maternal and perinatal complications unlike mothers from home.
产妇等候区在改善产科结果中的作用:一项比较横断面研究,南部地区州金卡地区医院
背景:待产区也称为待产之家,是位于公认的医疗设施附近的居住设施,来自偏远地区的非待产孕妇在此等待分娩,并在分娩前不久转至医疗设施。研究表明,99%的孕产妇死亡发生在发展中国家。埃塞俄比亚是造成全世界母亲死亡的一个主要国家。30年前,埃塞俄比亚采用了产妇等候区这一办法,旨在改善农村母亲获得全面紧急产科护理的机会。方法:采用以医院为基础的比较横断面研究。结果:516名产妇中只有16.7%的人进入候产区,其中90.7%来自农村。几乎所有来自待产区的母亲(98.8%)都在医院分娩,与来自家庭的母亲相比,不良产科结局的发生率相对较低。报告晚归产房的产妇中,农村产妇占53%以上。与家庭组、AOR和95% CI: 0.03(0.01, 0.24)相比,来自待产区的母亲经历延长胎膜早破的可能性要低97%。他们在分娩、AOR和95% CI: 0.25(0.15, 0.43)时延迟进入产房的几率也要低74%。集体不良产科结局发生率降低了27.5%,从家庭组的61.2%降至产科候诊室组的33.7%,95% CI: 0.32(0.20, 0.53)。结论:与在家分娩的母亲相比,在候产区分娩的母亲可以避免宫内感染的风险,从而避免产妇和围产期并发症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信