Introduction: Entrepreneurship in Community Development

N. Walzer
{"title":"Introduction: Entrepreneurship in Community Development","authors":"N. Walzer","doi":"10.1080/15575330409490118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community development has become a complex endeavor as local public officials and public officials strive to respond to changes in economic activity and the needs of an increasingly diverse population. While the specific issues differ, successful community development is important in both urban and rural areas. Also important, however, is a recognition that the approaches and opportunities for local development have changed markedly during the past several decades. A major focus in urban or regional development has been on immediate job creation. Downtown development was high on the list of activities when many, if not most, cities were either local or regional retail centers. Increases in transportation availability and shifts in retail marketing to shopping centers, discount stores, and the Internet have changed the economic development roles of many smaller communities, placing more pressure on community leaders to find other business opportunities. On a broader scale after WWII, traditional economic development efforts focused more on creating manufacturing employment with fiscal incentives and lower wages as southern states lured manufacturing from northern states. This \"smokestack chasing\" approach used by many developers, when successful, offered relatively quick and large employment increases, often with relatively higher wages than offered by retail or consumer service industries. The emphasis on economic development shifted in the 1970s with the findings by Birch and others that small businesses, rather than large corporations, were responsible for a majority of the employment growth (Birch, 1987). This interest in small businesses and start-ups spawned many business development and enhancement services such as the Small Business Development Network, Procurement Centers, business incubators, and other institutions aimed at helping potential entrepreneurs create business plans, seek start-up capital, and otherwise launch and promote their businesses. Also apparent was that retaining current businesses was equally or even more important in generating employment than attracting businesses. Interest then turned to finding ways in which existing and new businesses could collaborate to reduce costs, open additional markets, and otherwise be more competitive. \"Third Wave\" policies based partly on experiences in northern Italy and Scandinavian countries led to flexible manufacturing networks and other models built on the need to foster an environment and policies that enable businesses to be more competitive. These approaches also built on the work of Porter (1990) on clusters. The importance of community assets and business environment was recognized, more and more, as an essential ingredient in job creation and retention. More intense competition for manufacturing by off-shore locations forced many development practitioners to find innovative ways to compete for what seemed to be a smaller number of businesses seeking to relocate. Making businesses more competitive in the market and finding ways to increase the entrepreneurial spirit in a community were key to long-term economic development. Thus, practitioners realized that local prosperity had at least three general strategies. Traditional industrial attraction approaches form the basis for economic development in many communities, especially large cities with a staff that is able to market the cities to businesses. Second, business enhancement and development programs are still very common and are aimed at growth, or at least replacement, of smaller companies. In the past several years, approaches to development have shifted more to processes associated with economic change and business creation with specific attention paid to finding ways to increase the entrepreneurial climate and process within a region. The creation of entrepreneurship centers and associated agencies to support the outreach efforts of the Small Business Development Centers and other agencies emphasizes a need to specifically identify potential entrepreneurs and potential business opportunities. …","PeriodicalId":85029,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Community Development Society","volume":"8 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Community Development Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330409490118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Community development has become a complex endeavor as local public officials and public officials strive to respond to changes in economic activity and the needs of an increasingly diverse population. While the specific issues differ, successful community development is important in both urban and rural areas. Also important, however, is a recognition that the approaches and opportunities for local development have changed markedly during the past several decades. A major focus in urban or regional development has been on immediate job creation. Downtown development was high on the list of activities when many, if not most, cities were either local or regional retail centers. Increases in transportation availability and shifts in retail marketing to shopping centers, discount stores, and the Internet have changed the economic development roles of many smaller communities, placing more pressure on community leaders to find other business opportunities. On a broader scale after WWII, traditional economic development efforts focused more on creating manufacturing employment with fiscal incentives and lower wages as southern states lured manufacturing from northern states. This "smokestack chasing" approach used by many developers, when successful, offered relatively quick and large employment increases, often with relatively higher wages than offered by retail or consumer service industries. The emphasis on economic development shifted in the 1970s with the findings by Birch and others that small businesses, rather than large corporations, were responsible for a majority of the employment growth (Birch, 1987). This interest in small businesses and start-ups spawned many business development and enhancement services such as the Small Business Development Network, Procurement Centers, business incubators, and other institutions aimed at helping potential entrepreneurs create business plans, seek start-up capital, and otherwise launch and promote their businesses. Also apparent was that retaining current businesses was equally or even more important in generating employment than attracting businesses. Interest then turned to finding ways in which existing and new businesses could collaborate to reduce costs, open additional markets, and otherwise be more competitive. "Third Wave" policies based partly on experiences in northern Italy and Scandinavian countries led to flexible manufacturing networks and other models built on the need to foster an environment and policies that enable businesses to be more competitive. These approaches also built on the work of Porter (1990) on clusters. The importance of community assets and business environment was recognized, more and more, as an essential ingredient in job creation and retention. More intense competition for manufacturing by off-shore locations forced many development practitioners to find innovative ways to compete for what seemed to be a smaller number of businesses seeking to relocate. Making businesses more competitive in the market and finding ways to increase the entrepreneurial spirit in a community were key to long-term economic development. Thus, practitioners realized that local prosperity had at least three general strategies. Traditional industrial attraction approaches form the basis for economic development in many communities, especially large cities with a staff that is able to market the cities to businesses. Second, business enhancement and development programs are still very common and are aimed at growth, or at least replacement, of smaller companies. In the past several years, approaches to development have shifted more to processes associated with economic change and business creation with specific attention paid to finding ways to increase the entrepreneurial climate and process within a region. The creation of entrepreneurship centers and associated agencies to support the outreach efforts of the Small Business Development Centers and other agencies emphasizes a need to specifically identify potential entrepreneurs and potential business opportunities. …
前言:社区发展中的企业家精神
社区发展已成为一项复杂的努力,因为地方公职人员和公职人员努力对经济活动的变化和日益多样化的人口的需要作出反应。虽然具体问题不同,但成功的社区发展对城市和农村地区都很重要。然而,同样重要的是认识到,在过去几十年中,地方发展的方法和机会发生了显著变化。城市或区域发展的一个主要重点是立即创造就业机会。当许多(如果不是大多数)城市是本地或区域零售中心时,市中心发展在活动清单上名列前茅。交通便利的增加,以及零售市场向购物中心、折扣店和互联网的转变,改变了许多小型社区的经济发展角色,给社区领导人带来了寻找其他商业机会的更大压力。二战后,在更大的范围内,传统的经济发展努力更多地侧重于通过财政激励和较低的工资来创造制造业就业机会,因为南方各州从北方各州吸引了制造业。这种被许多开发者采用的“烟囱追逐”方法,一旦成功,就会提供相对快速和大量的就业增长,通常比零售或消费者服务行业提供的工资更高。经济发展的重点在20世纪70年代发生了转变,伯奇和其他人发现,小企业而不是大公司,对就业增长负有主要责任(伯奇,1987)。这种对小企业和初创企业的兴趣催生了许多商业发展和增强服务,如小企业发展网络、采购中心、企业孵化器和其他旨在帮助潜在企业家制定商业计划、寻求启动资金以及以其他方式启动和促进其业务的机构。同样明显的是,在创造就业方面,留住现有企业与吸引企业同等重要,甚至更为重要。于是,人们的兴趣转向了寻找现有企业和新企业合作的方式,以降低成本,打开更多的市场,并以其他方式提高竞争力。“第三次浪潮”政策部分基于意大利北部和斯堪的纳维亚国家的经验,导致了灵活的制造网络和其他模式,这些模式建立在培育使企业更具竞争力的环境和政策的需要之上。这些方法也是建立在Porter(1990)对集群的研究基础之上的。人们越来越认识到,社区资产和商业环境的重要性是创造和保留就业机会的一个基本因素。离岸地区对制造业更激烈的竞争迫使许多开发从业者寻找创新的方法来竞争似乎是少数寻求重新安置的企业。使企业在市场上更具竞争力,并设法提高社区的创业精神,是长期经济发展的关键。因此,从业者意识到,地方繁荣至少有三个总体策略。传统的工业吸引方法构成了许多社区经济发展的基础,特别是拥有能够向企业推销城市的工作人员的大城市。其次,业务增强和发展计划仍然非常普遍,旨在增长,或至少取代小公司。在过去几年中,发展办法已更多地转向与经济变革和商业创造有关的进程,并特别注意设法增加一个区域内的企业气氛和进程。设立创业中心和相关机构,以支持小企业发展中心和其他机构的外联工作,强调有必要具体确定潜在的企业家和潜在的商业机会。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信