{"title":"Systematic review of clinical trials on acupuncture in the Japanese literature","authors":"Hiroshi Tsukayama BA, LAc , Hitoshi Yamashita BS, LAc","doi":"10.1054/caom.2002.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> <!-->To evaluate and introduce the current status of acupuncture clinical trials in Japan.</p><p><em>Methods:</em> <!-->We performed a database search of controlled clinical trials (CCTs) published in Japan, using ‘Igaku Chuo Zasshi (<em>Japana Centra Revuo Medicina</em>) CD-ROM version (between 1987–2000)’ and an independent search. Parallel or crossover designed trials which assessed the efficacy of needle acupuncture were included.</p><p><em>Results:</em> <!-->We located 32 published papers (24 full papers and eight abstracts), which reported 34 trials. Only two of these were listed in Medline or the Cochrane Library. Conditions examined were musculoskeletal pain (20 trials including 10 for low back pain and three for sciatica), neck and shoulder stiffness (four trials) and miscellaneous conditions (10 trials). Thirty-three trials were described as randomized, although seven trials employed a quasi-random method. Applying the 5-point Jadad quality assessment scoring system, the mean score was 1.85 ± 1.16 (SD). Eighteen (53%) of the reports were conducted to determine a more effective procedure of acupuncture, these compared a certain type of acupuncture with another type of acupuncture or specific additional points.</p><p><em>Conclusions:</em> <!-->Japanese acupuncture CCTs, which are rarely listed in the Western databases, differ in several respects from Western reports. Systematic reviews including non-English papers with collaboration among authors representing different languages would promote more thorough scientific evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100265,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2002.0006","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146114490290006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and introduce the current status of acupuncture clinical trials in Japan.
Methods: We performed a database search of controlled clinical trials (CCTs) published in Japan, using ‘Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japana Centra Revuo Medicina) CD-ROM version (between 1987–2000)’ and an independent search. Parallel or crossover designed trials which assessed the efficacy of needle acupuncture were included.
Results: We located 32 published papers (24 full papers and eight abstracts), which reported 34 trials. Only two of these were listed in Medline or the Cochrane Library. Conditions examined were musculoskeletal pain (20 trials including 10 for low back pain and three for sciatica), neck and shoulder stiffness (four trials) and miscellaneous conditions (10 trials). Thirty-three trials were described as randomized, although seven trials employed a quasi-random method. Applying the 5-point Jadad quality assessment scoring system, the mean score was 1.85 ± 1.16 (SD). Eighteen (53%) of the reports were conducted to determine a more effective procedure of acupuncture, these compared a certain type of acupuncture with another type of acupuncture or specific additional points.
Conclusions: Japanese acupuncture CCTs, which are rarely listed in the Western databases, differ in several respects from Western reports. Systematic reviews including non-English papers with collaboration among authors representing different languages would promote more thorough scientific evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine.
目的:评价和介绍日本针灸临床试验的现状。方法:我们使用“Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Centra Revuo Medicina) CD-ROM版本(1987-2000年)”和独立检索对日本发表的对照临床试验(CCTs)进行数据库检索。包括评估针刺疗效的平行或交叉设计的试验。结果:我们检索到32篇已发表的论文(全文24篇,摘要8篇),共报道了34项试验。其中只有两个被列入Medline或Cochrane图书馆。检查的条件是肌肉骨骼疼痛(20个试验,包括10个腰痛和3个坐骨神经痛),颈部和肩部僵硬(4个试验)和其他条件(10个试验)。33项试验被描述为随机,尽管7项试验采用准随机方法。采用Jadad质量评价5分制评分,平均得分为1.85±1.16 (SD)。18例(53%)的报告是为了确定一种更有效的针灸方法,这些报告将某种类型的针灸与另一种类型的针灸或特定的附加穴位进行比较。结论:很少在西方数据库中列出的日本针灸cct在几个方面与西方报告不同。包括由不同语言的作者合作撰写的非英语论文在内的系统评价将促进对补充和替代医学进行更彻底的科学评价。