Comparison of Clarithromycin-based Triple Therapy and Furazolidone-based Quadruple Therapy in Eradicating Helicobacter pylori Infection

A. Bakhshipour, Narges Mohsenpour Mohammadi, S. Hashemi, Mohammad Kazem Momeni
{"title":"Comparison of Clarithromycin-based Triple Therapy and Furazolidone-based Quadruple Therapy in Eradicating Helicobacter pylori Infection","authors":"A. Bakhshipour, Narges Mohsenpour Mohammadi, S. Hashemi, Mohammad Kazem Momeni","doi":"10.5812/IJI.98954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Helicobacter pylori infection is the most common infection of human. This organism is responsible for the majority of peptic ulcer diseases, MALToma and gastric cancer, worldwide. Several regimen therapies against H. pylori had developed and are prescribed empirically, but therapies have rarely been optimized. Objectives: In this study, we compared two regimens that are widely used in Iran, triple regimen (clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole) and furazolidone-based quadruple regimen (furazolidone, amoxicillin, bismuth, and omeprazole) in some dyspeptic patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 373 consecutive dyspeptic patients that H. pylori infection was established, randomized into one of the following groups; 188 in group A (treated with clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1,000 mg, and omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 10 days) and 185 in group B (furazolidone 200 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg and omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 14 days). One month after discontinuation of the treatment, H. pylori eradication was evaluated with UBT. Results: Mean age of the patients was 35.9 ± 12.3 years, and the male to female ratio was 1: 1.6. In the per-protocol analysis, the eradication rate of H. pylori was 63.7% in comparison to 93% in group A and B, respectively (P < 0.004). Conclusions: Our study showed furazolidone-based quadruple regimen is superior to the standard triple regimen; thus, it is recommended as the first choice.","PeriodicalId":13989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infection","volume":"94 11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/IJI.98954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection is the most common infection of human. This organism is responsible for the majority of peptic ulcer diseases, MALToma and gastric cancer, worldwide. Several regimen therapies against H. pylori had developed and are prescribed empirically, but therapies have rarely been optimized. Objectives: In this study, we compared two regimens that are widely used in Iran, triple regimen (clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole) and furazolidone-based quadruple regimen (furazolidone, amoxicillin, bismuth, and omeprazole) in some dyspeptic patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 373 consecutive dyspeptic patients that H. pylori infection was established, randomized into one of the following groups; 188 in group A (treated with clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1,000 mg, and omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 10 days) and 185 in group B (furazolidone 200 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg and omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 14 days). One month after discontinuation of the treatment, H. pylori eradication was evaluated with UBT. Results: Mean age of the patients was 35.9 ± 12.3 years, and the male to female ratio was 1: 1.6. In the per-protocol analysis, the eradication rate of H. pylori was 63.7% in comparison to 93% in group A and B, respectively (P < 0.004). Conclusions: Our study showed furazolidone-based quadruple regimen is superior to the standard triple regimen; thus, it is recommended as the first choice.
克拉霉素三联疗法与呋喃唑酮四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌感染的比较
背景:幽门螺杆菌感染是人类最常见的感染。这种微生物是世界上大多数消化性溃疡疾病、MALToma和胃癌的罪魁祸首。针对幽门螺杆菌的几种治疗方案已经开发出来,并且是经验性的处方,但治疗方法很少得到优化。目的:在这项研究中,我们比较了在伊朗广泛使用的两种方案,三联方案(克拉霉素、阿莫西林和奥美拉唑)和呋喃唑酮为基础的四联方案(呋喃唑酮、阿莫西林、铋和奥美拉唑)在一些消化不良患者中的应用。方法:在本横断面研究中,373例连续确诊幽门螺旋杆菌感染的消化不良患者,随机分为以下组;A组188例(克拉霉素500 mg,阿莫西林1000 mg,奥美拉唑20 mg,每日2次,连用10天);B组185例(呋喃唑酮200 mg,阿莫西林1000 mg,亚柠檬酸铋240 mg,奥美拉唑20 mg,每日2次,连用14天)。停止治疗一个月后,用UBT评估幽门螺杆菌根除情况。结果:患者平均年龄35.9±12.3岁,男女比例为1:1 .6。按方案分析,A组幽门螺杆菌根除率为63.7%,B组为93% (P < 0.004)。结论:我们的研究表明呋喃唑酮四联治疗方案优于标准三联治疗方案;因此,推荐作为首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信