Enactors or reactors? Work-life border management for women in law in Nigeria

IF 1.9 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
T. Beauregard, T. Adisa
{"title":"Enactors or reactors? Work-life border management for women in law in Nigeria","authors":"T. Beauregard, T. Adisa","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2021.1968796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Work-family border theory casts individuals as protagonists who are enactive rather than reactive in shaping borders between work and personal life domains. To what extent is this the case in strongly patriarchal contexts that constrain women’s personal agency? This qualitative study conducted with 32 female lawyers, magistrates and justices in Nigeria shows how participants engage in new border management tactics in response to context-specific institutional and social factors. Faced with public harassment and physical assault in a country where violence against women is normalised, female legal professionals restructure family borders to extend no further than their homes and retain police attachés as border-keepers. When their families are reconfigured via nonconsensual polygamous marriages, women’s work borders are strengthened by co-wives performing domestic labour and family borders are strengthened by co-wives’ assistance with job tasks, thereby reducing participants’ work-family conflict. Rather than strategically enacting work-life borders within known situational constraints, Nigerian female legal professionals react to involuntary events that limit their agency to negotiate desired work and personal lives.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":"14 1","pages":"58 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Work & Family","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.1968796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Work-family border theory casts individuals as protagonists who are enactive rather than reactive in shaping borders between work and personal life domains. To what extent is this the case in strongly patriarchal contexts that constrain women’s personal agency? This qualitative study conducted with 32 female lawyers, magistrates and justices in Nigeria shows how participants engage in new border management tactics in response to context-specific institutional and social factors. Faced with public harassment and physical assault in a country where violence against women is normalised, female legal professionals restructure family borders to extend no further than their homes and retain police attachés as border-keepers. When their families are reconfigured via nonconsensual polygamous marriages, women’s work borders are strengthened by co-wives performing domestic labour and family borders are strengthened by co-wives’ assistance with job tasks, thereby reducing participants’ work-family conflict. Rather than strategically enacting work-life borders within known situational constraints, Nigerian female legal professionals react to involuntary events that limit their agency to negotiate desired work and personal lives.
演员还是反应堆?尼日利亚法律界妇女的工作-生活边界管理
工作-家庭边界理论将个人塑造为主角,在塑造工作和个人生活领域之间的边界时,他们是主动的,而不是被动的。在强烈的父权制背景下,这种情况在多大程度上限制了女性的个人能动性?这项对尼日利亚32名女律师、地方法官和法官进行的定性研究显示,参与者如何根据具体情况采用新的边境管理策略,以应对具体的体制和社会因素。在一个对妇女的暴力行为正常化的国家,面对公众骚扰和人身攻击,女性法律专业人员重新调整家庭边界,使其不超出自己的家,并保留警察专员作为边界守卫者。当她们的家庭通过非自愿的一夫多妻婚姻被重新配置时,女性的工作边界因共同妻子从事家务劳动而得到加强,而家庭边界因共同妻子协助完成工作任务而得到加强,从而减少了参与者的工作-家庭冲突。尼日利亚女性法律专业人士没有在已知的情境限制下战略性地制定工作与生活的界限,而是对限制她们的代理机构谈判理想的工作和个人生活的非自愿事件做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信