Comparing LACP Implementation between Ryu and Opendaylight SDN Controller

F. Baskoro, Risanuri Hidayat, S. Wibowo
{"title":"Comparing LACP Implementation between Ryu and Opendaylight SDN Controller","authors":"F. Baskoro, Risanuri Hidayat, S. Wibowo","doi":"10.1109/ICITEED.2019.8929986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software Defined Network (SDN) is one of the recent trends in computer networks research. One of the issues faced by SDN deployment is the compatibility with the existing network infrastructure. One of them is the ability to handle Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP). This paper’s objective is to compare LACP implementation in Software Defined Network between two different SDN controller, Ryu, and Opendaylight. The experiment conducts in Mininet simulation and real hardware experiment. The parameters being observed are aggregation throughput and switchover-time. The results show that Ryu and Opendaylight have nearly the same aggregation throughput. While the switchover-time using Opendaylight is much faster rather than Ryu.","PeriodicalId":6598,"journal":{"name":"2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","volume":"133 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2019.8929986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Software Defined Network (SDN) is one of the recent trends in computer networks research. One of the issues faced by SDN deployment is the compatibility with the existing network infrastructure. One of them is the ability to handle Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP). This paper’s objective is to compare LACP implementation in Software Defined Network between two different SDN controller, Ryu, and Opendaylight. The experiment conducts in Mininet simulation and real hardware experiment. The parameters being observed are aggregation throughput and switchover-time. The results show that Ryu and Opendaylight have nearly the same aggregation throughput. While the switchover-time using Opendaylight is much faster rather than Ryu.
Ryu和Opendaylight SDN控制器LACP实现的比较
软件定义网络(SDN)是计算机网络研究的最新趋势之一。SDN部署面临的问题之一是与现有网络基础设施的兼容性。其中之一是处理链路聚合控制协议(LACP)的能力。本文的目的是比较两种不同的SDN控制器Ryu和Opendaylight在软件定义网络中的LACP实现。实验在Mininet仿真和真实硬件实验中进行。观察到的参数是聚合吞吐量和切换时间。结果表明,Ryu和Opendaylight具有几乎相同的聚合吞吐量。而Opendaylight的切换时间比Ryu快得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信