Study to find the indications and adverse reactions in patients receiving intravitreal injections at ophthalmology unit, RVM hospital, Telangana state, India

Venkataswamy, Manoj Patruni, Chinthala Narsaiah
{"title":"Study to find the indications and adverse reactions in patients receiving intravitreal injections at ophthalmology unit, RVM hospital, Telangana state, India","authors":"Venkataswamy, Manoj Patruni, Chinthala Narsaiah","doi":"10.33545/26638266.2020.v2.i2a.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Intravitreal injection of air was first used by Ohm in 1911 for repairing retinal detachments. Intravitreal pharmacotherapy is likely to increase as more and more agents are being developed and tested for a variety of retinal diseases. Methodology: A hospital based prospective randomised interventional study conducted on patients attending ophthalmology department of RVM Hospital from May 2019 to March 2020, where intravitreal injections of Triamcinolone acetonide (4mg/0.1 ml), Bevacizumab (1.25mg/0.05ml), Ranibizumab (0.5mg/0.05ml), Ganciclovir (2mg/0.1ml) were injected for various vitreoretinal diseases. Results: The common age group was 46-60 years in this study and the age group of 16-30 were limited in this study. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was 148, retinal vein occlusion (RVO) 169, Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) 114 were main indications for intravitreal injection therapy and the least being Coats disease 3, and idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV) 3. Bevacizumab is the drug which was used excessively in this study as intravitreal injection (57.45%) followed by Ranibizumab (19.66%) and the least being Ganciclovir (10.33%). Conclusion: Intravitreal injection is a safe and efficient technique. The risk of serious vision threatening complications is very low.","PeriodicalId":14021,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26638266.2020.v2.i2a.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intravitreal injection of air was first used by Ohm in 1911 for repairing retinal detachments. Intravitreal pharmacotherapy is likely to increase as more and more agents are being developed and tested for a variety of retinal diseases. Methodology: A hospital based prospective randomised interventional study conducted on patients attending ophthalmology department of RVM Hospital from May 2019 to March 2020, where intravitreal injections of Triamcinolone acetonide (4mg/0.1 ml), Bevacizumab (1.25mg/0.05ml), Ranibizumab (0.5mg/0.05ml), Ganciclovir (2mg/0.1ml) were injected for various vitreoretinal diseases. Results: The common age group was 46-60 years in this study and the age group of 16-30 were limited in this study. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was 148, retinal vein occlusion (RVO) 169, Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) 114 were main indications for intravitreal injection therapy and the least being Coats disease 3, and idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV) 3. Bevacizumab is the drug which was used excessively in this study as intravitreal injection (57.45%) followed by Ranibizumab (19.66%) and the least being Ganciclovir (10.33%). Conclusion: Intravitreal injection is a safe and efficient technique. The risk of serious vision threatening complications is very low.
印度特伦甘纳邦RVM医院眼科部门玻璃体内注射患者的适应证和不良反应研究
简介:1911年欧姆首次使用玻璃体内注射空气来修复视网膜脱离。随着越来越多的药物被开发和测试用于各种视网膜疾病,玻璃体内药物治疗可能会增加。方法:以2019年5月至2020年3月在RVM医院眼科就诊的患者为研究对象,采用基于医院的前瞻性随机介入研究方法,采用玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德(4mg/0.1 ml)、贝伐单抗(1.25mg/0.05ml)、雷尼单抗(0.5mg/0.05ml)、更昔洛韦(2mg/0.1ml)治疗各种玻璃体视网膜疾病。结果:本研究以46 ~ 60岁为常见年龄组,16 ~ 30岁为有限年龄组。年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD) 148例,视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO) 169例,增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR) 114例是玻璃体内注射治疗的主要适应症,最少的是Coats病3例,特发性息肉样脉络膜血管病变(IPCV) 3例。贝伐单抗是本研究中玻璃体内注射使用最多的药物(57.45%),其次是雷尼单抗(19.66%),更昔洛韦最少(10.33%)。结论:玻璃体内注射是一种安全、有效的方法。严重视力威胁并发症的风险非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信