{"title":"\"Dyjalog\" Kasjana Sakowicza (1642) jako druk i rękopis. XVII-wieczne spory kalendarzowe i problem obiegu idei w kulturze staropolskiej","authors":"Michał Choptiany","doi":"10.18318/PL.2017.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MICHAŁ CHOPTIANY University of Warsaw KASJAN SAKOWICZ’S 1642 “DYJALOG” („DIALOGUE”) AS A PRINTED BOOK AND A MANUSCRIPT SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY CALENDRICAL ARGUMENTS AND CIRCULATION OF IDEAS IN THE OLD POLISH CULTURE This paper is aimed at examining a mid-seventeenth century manuscript copy of Kasjan Sakowicz’s Dyjalog (Dialogue), published twice in 1642, being a satirical writing aimed at ridiculing the backwardness and stubbornness of the Uniate Church with regard to the acknowledgment of the Gregorian calendar. Since we have relatively little information about the scope and nature of readers’ reception of the writings created in relation to the calendrical polemics, the handwritten copy of the Dialogue","PeriodicalId":42580,"journal":{"name":"PAMIETNIK LITERACKI","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAMIETNIK LITERACKI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18318/PL.2017.3.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
MICHAŁ CHOPTIANY University of Warsaw KASJAN SAKOWICZ’S 1642 “DYJALOG” („DIALOGUE”) AS A PRINTED BOOK AND A MANUSCRIPT SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY CALENDRICAL ARGUMENTS AND CIRCULATION OF IDEAS IN THE OLD POLISH CULTURE This paper is aimed at examining a mid-seventeenth century manuscript copy of Kasjan Sakowicz’s Dyjalog (Dialogue), published twice in 1642, being a satirical writing aimed at ridiculing the backwardness and stubbornness of the Uniate Church with regard to the acknowledgment of the Gregorian calendar. Since we have relatively little information about the scope and nature of readers’ reception of the writings created in relation to the calendrical polemics, the handwritten copy of the Dialogue
MICHAŁ CHOPTIANY华沙大学KASJAN SAKOWICZ的1642年“DYJALOG”(“对话”)作为印刷书籍和手稿17世纪历法争论和旧波兰文化中思想的流通本文旨在研究17世纪中期KASJAN SAKOWICZ的《DYJALOG(对话)》的手稿副本,该手稿于1642年出版了两次。是一篇讽刺作品,旨在嘲笑联合教会在承认格里高利历方面的落后和固执。由于我们对读者接受与历法论战有关的作品的范围和性质的信息相对较少,所以《对话》的手写副本