A reply to critics
IF 0.1
Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Olga A. Kozyreva
{"title":"A reply to critics","authors":"Olga A. Kozyreva","doi":"10.17223/1998863x/67/27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes and responds to the most significant criticisms of public journalism made by scholars. After discussing public journalism advocates’ alleged failure to define public journalism clearly, we examine more specific criticisms. Among other issues, few advocates have taken seriously the likely impact of commercial imperatives on public journalism’s modes of operation. We argue, however, that public journalism projects show that reform-oriented news organizations can challenge long-standing journalistic conventions, despite managements’ interests in maximizing profit. Ultimately, we argue, public journalism’s long-term viability depends on continuing, explicit commitment by journalists, its institutionalization within newsrooms and journalism classrooms, and continued theory-development, research, and assessment. K E Y W O R D S citizen participation civic journalism journalism theory public sphere The public journalism movement is a controversial, if not divisive, topic among journalism scholars and practicing journalists. It emerged in the early 1990s in response to two widening gaps of ‘crisis’ proportions: between government and citizens, and between news organizations and their audiences. That is, declines in voter participation in political elections and, more generally, in civic participation in local community affairs, were often cited as evidence of widespread withdrawal by citizens from democratic processes. Similarly, scholars and journalists, having often criticized news organizations’ horse-race approach to political campaigns, interpreted the public’s apparent disinterest in voting as proving widespread public disaffection with massmediated political discourse. In response, many news organizations began to experiment with ways to enhance civic commitment and participation in Journalism Copyright © 2006 SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi) Vol. 7(2): 238–254 DOI: 10.1177/1464884906062607","PeriodicalId":54008,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Filosofiya-Sotsiologiya-Politologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy Sociology and Political Science","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Filosofiya-Sotsiologiya-Politologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy Sociology and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863x/67/27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38
Abstract
This article analyzes and responds to the most significant criticisms of public journalism made by scholars. After discussing public journalism advocates’ alleged failure to define public journalism clearly, we examine more specific criticisms. Among other issues, few advocates have taken seriously the likely impact of commercial imperatives on public journalism’s modes of operation. We argue, however, that public journalism projects show that reform-oriented news organizations can challenge long-standing journalistic conventions, despite managements’ interests in maximizing profit. Ultimately, we argue, public journalism’s long-term viability depends on continuing, explicit commitment by journalists, its institutionalization within newsrooms and journalism classrooms, and continued theory-development, research, and assessment. K E Y W O R D S citizen participation civic journalism journalism theory public sphere The public journalism movement is a controversial, if not divisive, topic among journalism scholars and practicing journalists. It emerged in the early 1990s in response to two widening gaps of ‘crisis’ proportions: between government and citizens, and between news organizations and their audiences. That is, declines in voter participation in political elections and, more generally, in civic participation in local community affairs, were often cited as evidence of widespread withdrawal by citizens from democratic processes. Similarly, scholars and journalists, having often criticized news organizations’ horse-race approach to political campaigns, interpreted the public’s apparent disinterest in voting as proving widespread public disaffection with massmediated political discourse. In response, many news organizations began to experiment with ways to enhance civic commitment and participation in Journalism Copyright © 2006 SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi) Vol. 7(2): 238–254 DOI: 10.1177/1464884906062607
对批评的回应
本文分析并回应了学者们对公共新闻学最重要的批评。在讨论了公共新闻倡导者所谓的未能明确定义公共新闻之后,我们将研究更具体的批评。在其他问题中,很少有倡导者认真对待商业需求对公共新闻运作模式的可能影响。然而,我们认为,公共新闻项目表明,尽管管理层对利润最大化感兴趣,但以改革为导向的新闻机构可以挑战长期存在的新闻惯例。最终,我们认为,公共新闻的长期生存能力取决于记者的持续、明确的承诺,它在新闻编辑室和新闻教室中的制度化,以及持续的理论发展、研究和评估。公民参与公民新闻学新闻学理论公共领域公共新闻运动在新闻学者和新闻从业人员之间是一个充满争议的话题。它出现于20世纪90年代初,是为了应对两种日益扩大的“危机”差距:政府与公民之间、新闻机构与受众之间。也就是说,选民对政治选举的参与减少,以及更普遍地说,公民对地方社区事务的参与减少,经常被认为是公民普遍退出民主进程的证据。同样,学者和记者经常批评新闻机构对政治竞选的“赛马”方式,他们将公众对投票的明显不感兴趣解释为公众对大众传播的政治话语普遍不满。作为回应,许多新闻机构开始尝试加强公民承诺和新闻参与的方法版权©2006 SAGE出版物(伦敦,千橡,CA和新德里)卷7(2):238-254 DOI: 10.1177/1464884906062607
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。