Cripping Environmental Communication: A Review of Eco-Ableism, Eco-Normativity, and Climate Justice Futurities

IF 3 3区社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1080/17524032.2022.2126869

E. Cram, Martin P. Law, P. Pezzullo

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The field of environmental communication has yet to integrate disability or ableism as a primary area of research or intersectional investment. The ableist silences and disability slights are notable, however. This review essay provides a working definition of eco-ableism, including a summary of disability imagined through medical and social models. Then, the authors reflect on the role of voice as a method. Next, the essay synthesizes existing interdisciplinary literature to establish three broad trajectories of environmental communication research: (1) ecoableism in wilderness and outdoor recreation; (2) eco-normativities in public health discourses; and (3) climate justice futurism as public advocacy. While not exhaustive, the authors hope this review essay will help prompt the overdue cripping of environmental communication.

查看原文本刊更多论文

削弱环境传播:生态能力主义、生态规范主义与气候正义未来的回顾

环境传播领域尚未将残疾或残疾主义作为一个主要的研究领域或交叉投资。然而，残疾主义者的沉默和对残疾人的轻视是值得注意的。这篇综述文章提供了生态残疾主义的工作定义，包括通过医学和社会模式想象的残疾的总结。然后，作者对声音作为一种方法的作用进行了反思。其次，综合现有跨学科文献，构建了环境传播学研究的三大轨迹:(1)荒野与户外游憩中的生态主义;(2)公共卫生话语中的生态规范;(3)气候正义未来主义作为公共倡导。虽然不详尽，但作者希望这篇综述文章将有助于促进环境传播的迟来的破坏。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture Multiple-

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

7.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Environmental Communication is an international, peer-reviewed forum for multidisciplinary research and analysis assessing the many intersections among communication, media, society, and environmental issues. These include but are not limited to debates over climate change, natural resources, sustainability, conservation, wildlife, ecosystems, water, environmental health, food and agriculture, energy, and emerging technologies. Submissions should contribute to our understanding of scientific controversies, political developments, policy solutions, institutional change, cultural trends, media portrayals, public opinion and participation, and/or professional decisions. Articles often seek to bridge gaps between theory and practice, and are written in a style that is broadly accessible and engaging.