Evaluation of mandibular indices and cephalometric parameters in adolescents with impacted maxillary canines

IF 0.7 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Esra Genc, S. Buyuk
{"title":"Evaluation of mandibular indices and cephalometric parameters in adolescents with impacted maxillary canines","authors":"Esra Genc, S. Buyuk","doi":"10.25259/apos_38_2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMaxillary impacted canines have an important place in orthodontics for the reason of being a common anomaly and its treatment is time consuming and difficult. The aim of this study was to investigate the mandibular indexes and cephalometric parameters in adolescents with impacted maxillary canines.\n\n\n\nThe radiographs of 4026 patients aged 12–19 years old were scanned and a total of 155 patients were included in the study. Subjects were divided into three groups according to the permanent maxillary canines: Bilateral impacted canine (BIC) (52 subjects; mean age 15.02 ± 1.74 years), unilaterally impacted canine (UIC) (51 subjects; mean age 14.89 ± 1.39 years), and the control (52 subjects; mean age 14.84 ± 1.65 years) groups. Skeletal, soft tissue and dental measurements were performed on cephalometric radiographs. Mandibular index analyzes including the panoramic mandibular index (PMI), mental index (MI), antegonial index (AI), and gonial index (GI) measurements and also angular measurements of impacted maxillary canines were performed on panoramic radiographs. Data were analyzed statistically and P < 0.05 was considered significant.\n\n\n\nMaxillary skeletal and dental measurements showed retrusive positioned maxillary dental arch in the sagittal direction in the impacted canine groups (P < 0.05). PMI and MI values were greater in the BIC and UIC groups than in control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in AI value among groups (P < 0.05). GI value of BIC group was found statistically lower than other groups (P < 0.05).\n\n\n\nIndividuals with impacted maxillary canines have more retrusive maxillary dental arch and soft-tissue components. Furthermore, mandibular cortex was thicker in subjects with impacted maxillary canine than individuals with not and clinicians should keep in mind this when examine the panoramic radiographs in terms of early diagnosis of impacted maxillary canine teeth.\n","PeriodicalId":42593,"journal":{"name":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_38_2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maxillary impacted canines have an important place in orthodontics for the reason of being a common anomaly and its treatment is time consuming and difficult. The aim of this study was to investigate the mandibular indexes and cephalometric parameters in adolescents with impacted maxillary canines. The radiographs of 4026 patients aged 12–19 years old were scanned and a total of 155 patients were included in the study. Subjects were divided into three groups according to the permanent maxillary canines: Bilateral impacted canine (BIC) (52 subjects; mean age 15.02 ± 1.74 years), unilaterally impacted canine (UIC) (51 subjects; mean age 14.89 ± 1.39 years), and the control (52 subjects; mean age 14.84 ± 1.65 years) groups. Skeletal, soft tissue and dental measurements were performed on cephalometric radiographs. Mandibular index analyzes including the panoramic mandibular index (PMI), mental index (MI), antegonial index (AI), and gonial index (GI) measurements and also angular measurements of impacted maxillary canines were performed on panoramic radiographs. Data were analyzed statistically and P < 0.05 was considered significant. Maxillary skeletal and dental measurements showed retrusive positioned maxillary dental arch in the sagittal direction in the impacted canine groups (P < 0.05). PMI and MI values were greater in the BIC and UIC groups than in control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in AI value among groups (P < 0.05). GI value of BIC group was found statistically lower than other groups (P < 0.05). Individuals with impacted maxillary canines have more retrusive maxillary dental arch and soft-tissue components. Furthermore, mandibular cortex was thicker in subjects with impacted maxillary canine than individuals with not and clinicians should keep in mind this when examine the panoramic radiographs in terms of early diagnosis of impacted maxillary canine teeth.
上颌牙阻生青少年下颌指数和头侧测量参数的评价
上颌阻生牙是一种常见的畸形,治疗费时费力,在口腔正畸中占有重要地位。本研究的目的是探讨青少年上颌埋伏牙的下颌指数和头侧测量参数。对4026例12-19岁患者的x线片进行扫描,共纳入155例患者。根据上颌恒牙分为三组:双侧阻生犬(BIC) 52例;平均年龄15.02±1.74岁),单侧阻生犬(UIC) 51例;平均年龄(14.89±1.39岁),对照组(52例;平均年龄14.84±1.65岁)组。在头颅x线片上进行骨骼、软组织和牙齿测量。下颌指数分析,包括全景下颌指数(PMI)、心理指数(MI)、顺颌指数(AI)和下颌指数(GI)测量,以及在全景x线片上对上颌埋伏牙进行角度测量。对资料进行统计学分析,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。上颌骨骼和牙齿测量显示,阻生犬组上颌牙弓向矢状方向后退(P < 0.05)。BIC组和UIC组PMI和MI值均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。各组患者AI值比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。BIC组GI值明显低于其他组(P < 0.05)。上颌阻生犬的个体有更多的上颌牙弓和软组织成分。此外,上颌犬牙阻生的受试者下颌骨皮层比未患上颌犬牙阻生的受试者下颌骨皮层更厚,临床医生在检查上颌犬牙阻生的全景x线片时应牢记这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
APOS Trends in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信