Ankle and Knee Joint Kinematics Differ between Flat, Slice and Topspin Serves in Young Tennis Players

Q4 Health Professions
C. Mourtzios, Ioannis Athanailidis, Vasilia Arvanitidou, E. Kellis
{"title":"Ankle and Knee Joint Kinematics Differ between Flat, Slice and Topspin Serves in Young Tennis Players","authors":"C. Mourtzios, Ioannis Athanailidis, Vasilia Arvanitidou, E. Kellis","doi":"10.24018/ejsport.2022.1.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to examine the differences in ankle and knee joint kinematics between the flat, slice, and topspin tennis serves. Twelve young tennis players (six boys, and six girls) aged 12-16 years old, performed flat, slice and topspin serve whilst three-dimensional body kinematics were recorded using an optoelectronic camera system. Ankle plantarflexion/dorsiflexion and knee extension/flexion angular positions were recorded at two-time instants: first, at the time of maximum knee flexion and, second, at time of ball to racket contact. Analysis of variance designs showed that the knee flexion angle of the back leg differed significantly between the three service types (P < 0.001). Further, the rear leg ankle angle at maximum flexion also significantly differed between the three serves (P < 0.004). It was observed that tennis players perform topspin and slice serves with smaller joint angles than flat serves, probably, because the former is being used as a second serve in the game. Τhe ankle, which is the closest point of the kinetic chain at the start of power generation, plays an important and different role in the performance of the three serve types. Therefore, the synergy of the ankle joint is very important in the initial phase of serve for the transfer of forces. Coaches should review the technical issues of serve movement based on the flexibility of the ankle joint because the limited ankle range of motion does not help to transfer forces from the ground.","PeriodicalId":36509,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsport.2022.1.2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the differences in ankle and knee joint kinematics between the flat, slice, and topspin tennis serves. Twelve young tennis players (six boys, and six girls) aged 12-16 years old, performed flat, slice and topspin serve whilst three-dimensional body kinematics were recorded using an optoelectronic camera system. Ankle plantarflexion/dorsiflexion and knee extension/flexion angular positions were recorded at two-time instants: first, at the time of maximum knee flexion and, second, at time of ball to racket contact. Analysis of variance designs showed that the knee flexion angle of the back leg differed significantly between the three service types (P < 0.001). Further, the rear leg ankle angle at maximum flexion also significantly differed between the three serves (P < 0.004). It was observed that tennis players perform topspin and slice serves with smaller joint angles than flat serves, probably, because the former is being used as a second serve in the game. Τhe ankle, which is the closest point of the kinetic chain at the start of power generation, plays an important and different role in the performance of the three serve types. Therefore, the synergy of the ankle joint is very important in the initial phase of serve for the transfer of forces. Coaches should review the technical issues of serve movement based on the flexibility of the ankle joint because the limited ankle range of motion does not help to transfer forces from the ground.
青少年网球运动员平球、削球和上旋球的踝关节和膝关节运动学差异
本研究的目的是检查踝关节和膝关节运动在平球、削球和上旋球发球之间的差异。12名年龄在12-16岁之间的年轻网球运动员(6名男孩和6名女孩),在使用光电相机系统记录三维身体运动学的同时,进行平球、削球和上旋球。在两个时间瞬间记录踝关节跖屈/背屈和膝关节伸/屈的角度位置:第一次,在膝关节最大屈曲的时候,第二次,在球与球拍接触的时候。方差设计分析显示,三种服务类型之间后腿膝关节屈曲角度差异显著(P < 0.001)。此外,三种发球者最大屈曲时的后腿踝关节角度也有显著差异(P < 0.004)。据观察,网球运动员上旋球和削球的关节角度比平球小,可能是因为前者在比赛中被用作第二发。Τhe踝关节是发力开始时动能链的最近点,在三种发球类型的表现中起着重要而不同的作用。因此,在发球的初始阶段,踝关节的协同作用对于力量的传递是非常重要的。教练应该根据踝关节的灵活性来复习发球动作的技术问题,因为踝关节有限的活动范围无助于从地面转移力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信