IS IT FAIR TO ASSESS THE PERFORMANCE OF ISLAMIC BANKS BASED ON THE CONVENTIONAL BANK PLATFORM?

Elyanti Rosmanidar, Muhamad Ahsan, Abu Azam Al-Hadi, Nguyen Thi Minh Phuong
{"title":"IS IT FAIR TO ASSESS THE PERFORMANCE OF ISLAMIC BANKS BASED ON THE CONVENTIONAL BANK PLATFORM?","authors":"Elyanti Rosmanidar, Muhamad Ahsan, Abu Azam Al-Hadi, Nguyen Thi Minh Phuong","doi":"10.18860/ua.v23i1.15473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies found the weakness of using conventional performance measurement tools such as CAMELS and RGEC in Islamic banking and the lack of performance measurement tools following the characteristics of Islamic banks. The findings showed the need for a performance measurement system that integrates the objectives of sharia and the business objectives of sharia banking. This study explored the application of Maqashid shariah values in Islamic banking and initiated a Sharia Integrated Performance Measurement (SIPM) structure. The researchers used Grounded Theory and library research. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with practitioners, experts, and academics of Islamic banking, while secondary data was taken from the literature and previous research that discussed the measurement of Islamic banking performance. The data were analyzed through several stages: data reduction, data display, and concluding with the help of the Atlas.ti application version 8. This study would like to contribute to the idea of building a Sharia Integrated Performance Measurement (SIPM) platform through three components: Islamic commercial performance, Islamic social performance, and Islamic macroeconomics performance in Islamic banking.","PeriodicalId":53390,"journal":{"name":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v23i1.15473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several studies found the weakness of using conventional performance measurement tools such as CAMELS and RGEC in Islamic banking and the lack of performance measurement tools following the characteristics of Islamic banks. The findings showed the need for a performance measurement system that integrates the objectives of sharia and the business objectives of sharia banking. This study explored the application of Maqashid shariah values in Islamic banking and initiated a Sharia Integrated Performance Measurement (SIPM) structure. The researchers used Grounded Theory and library research. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with practitioners, experts, and academics of Islamic banking, while secondary data was taken from the literature and previous research that discussed the measurement of Islamic banking performance. The data were analyzed through several stages: data reduction, data display, and concluding with the help of the Atlas.ti application version 8. This study would like to contribute to the idea of building a Sharia Integrated Performance Measurement (SIPM) platform through three components: Islamic commercial performance, Islamic social performance, and Islamic macroeconomics performance in Islamic banking.
基于传统的银行平台来评估伊斯兰银行的表现是否公平?
几项研究发现,在伊斯兰银行中使用传统绩效衡量工具(如camel和RGEC)存在弱点,而且缺乏符合伊斯兰银行特点的绩效衡量工具。调查结果表明,有必要建立一个绩效评估系统,将伊斯兰教法的目标与伊斯兰教法银行的业务目标结合起来。本研究探讨了伊斯兰教法价值观在伊斯兰银行中的应用,并提出了伊斯兰教法综合绩效衡量(SIPM)结构。研究人员使用了扎根理论和图书馆研究。通过对伊斯兰银行从业人员、专家和学者的深入访谈收集数据,而辅助数据则取自文献和先前讨论伊斯兰银行绩效衡量的研究。在Atlas的帮助下,通过数据简化、数据显示和总结几个阶段对数据进行分析。应用程序版本8。本研究希望通过三个组成部分:伊斯兰商业绩效、伊斯兰社会绩效和伊斯兰宏观经济绩效,为建立伊斯兰综合绩效衡量(SIPM)平台的想法做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信