Effect of selected neonicotinoids on predatory coccinellids in Bt cotton ecosystem

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
R. Srinivasan, M. Rajan
{"title":"Effect of selected neonicotinoids on predatory coccinellids in Bt cotton ecosystem","authors":"R. Srinivasan, M. Rajan","doi":"10.18311/jbc/2021/29749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the introduction of Bt cotton in India during 2002, the production and productivity has increased considerably with the reduction in bollworm complex incidences. But, sucking insect pests became a menace that warranted spraying of chemical insecticides. These insecticides belonging different groups, adversely affected the population of natural enemies like coccinellids that played a vital role in naturally keeping the sucking insect pest population under control. Field studies were conducted in 2 villages viz., Mambattu and Salai in Tamilnadu during the years 2014 and 2015. Five neonicotinoids viz., imidacloprid 17.8 SL, acetamiprid 20 SP, thiacloprid 21.7 SC, thiamethoxam 25 WDG and clothianidin 50 WDG were tested alongside monocrotophos 36 SL and untreated control. At 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after treatment, monocrotophos recorded maximum population reduction of 78.8, 83.5, 70.4 and 62.6% respectively. Among neonicotinoids, clothionidin was found to be comparatively more toxic to coccinellids, followed by thiamethoxam and thiacloprid. Acetamiprid was found to be safest among chemical treatments with population reduction percentages of 45.6, 53.9, 36.5 and 24.7% respectively at 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after treatment followed by imidacloprid and thiacloprid. Two rounds of spray of neonicotinoids on Bt cotton had significant impact on the Coccinellids, when compared with untreated control plots. However, monocrotophos recorded relatively lowest population of coccinellids compared to untreated control and neonicotinoids. With significant population built-up after 7 days after acetamiprid and imidacloprid sprays, the 2 neonicotinoids may be suitable candidates for inclusion in integrated pest management of sucking insect pests in major Bt cotton growing areas as these insecticides are comparatively less toxic to predators as compared to broad spectrum neonicotinoids like thiacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin and non-selective insecticide like monocrotophos.","PeriodicalId":15188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Control","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2021/29749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the introduction of Bt cotton in India during 2002, the production and productivity has increased considerably with the reduction in bollworm complex incidences. But, sucking insect pests became a menace that warranted spraying of chemical insecticides. These insecticides belonging different groups, adversely affected the population of natural enemies like coccinellids that played a vital role in naturally keeping the sucking insect pest population under control. Field studies were conducted in 2 villages viz., Mambattu and Salai in Tamilnadu during the years 2014 and 2015. Five neonicotinoids viz., imidacloprid 17.8 SL, acetamiprid 20 SP, thiacloprid 21.7 SC, thiamethoxam 25 WDG and clothianidin 50 WDG were tested alongside monocrotophos 36 SL and untreated control. At 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after treatment, monocrotophos recorded maximum population reduction of 78.8, 83.5, 70.4 and 62.6% respectively. Among neonicotinoids, clothionidin was found to be comparatively more toxic to coccinellids, followed by thiamethoxam and thiacloprid. Acetamiprid was found to be safest among chemical treatments with population reduction percentages of 45.6, 53.9, 36.5 and 24.7% respectively at 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after treatment followed by imidacloprid and thiacloprid. Two rounds of spray of neonicotinoids on Bt cotton had significant impact on the Coccinellids, when compared with untreated control plots. However, monocrotophos recorded relatively lowest population of coccinellids compared to untreated control and neonicotinoids. With significant population built-up after 7 days after acetamiprid and imidacloprid sprays, the 2 neonicotinoids may be suitable candidates for inclusion in integrated pest management of sucking insect pests in major Bt cotton growing areas as these insecticides are comparatively less toxic to predators as compared to broad spectrum neonicotinoids like thiacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin and non-selective insecticide like monocrotophos.
新烟碱类杀虫剂对Bt棉生态系统中捕食性瓢虫的影响
随着2002年在印度引进Bt棉花,棉铃虫复合发病率降低,产量和生产力显著提高。但是,吸虫成了一种威胁,需要喷洒化学杀虫剂。这些不同种类的杀虫剂对瓢虫等天敌种群产生了不利影响,而瓢虫在自然控制吸血害虫种群方面起着至关重要的作用。在2014年和2015年期间,在泰米尔纳德邦的两个村庄,即曼巴图和萨莱进行了实地研究。以吡虫啉17.8 SL、啶虫啉20 SP、噻虫啉21.7 SC、噻虫嗪25 WDG和噻虫胺50 WDG为5种新烟碱,与单效磷36 SL和未处理对照进行对照。在处理后1、3、7和14 d,单效磷的最大种群减少率分别为78.8、83.5、70.4和62.6%。在新烟碱类中,噻虫胺对瓢虫的毒性最大,其次是噻虫嗪和噻虫啉。在化学处理中,吡虫啉最安全,在治疗后1、3、7和14 d,种群减少率分别为45.6%、53.9、36.5和24.7%,其次是吡虫啉和噻虫啉。与未经处理的对照区相比,在Bt棉花上喷施两轮新烟碱对球虫有显著影响。然而,与未经处理的对照和新烟碱相比,单效磷记录了相对最低的球虫种群。与噻虫啉、噻虫嗪、噻虫胺等广谱新烟碱类杀虫剂和噻虫磷等非选择性杀虫剂相比,这两种新烟碱类杀虫剂对捕食者的毒性相对较低,在Bt棉花主产区的吸虫综合治理中具有显著的种群积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biological Control
Journal of Biological Control Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信