The Arctic window: a view to Greenland’s foreign policy

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Alexander Niels-Jacob Hviid
{"title":"The Arctic window: a view to Greenland’s foreign policy","authors":"Alexander Niels-Jacob Hviid","doi":"10.7146/politica.v54i1.130601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In both the Home Rule Act as well as the Self-Government Act, it was made clear that Greenland had and has a certain legal leeway to conduct its own foreign policy. However, the exact extent of this leeway has always been unclear. This legal ambiguity played out in practice in the case of the “Arctic Window” from 1999. Then as now, Copenhagen and Nuuk had divergent interpretations of Greenland’s leeway to conduct its own foreign policy – this divergence was not communicated openly but rather swept under the rug. The fundamental legal ambiguity has been perpetuated in the Self-Government Act in force today. The dynamics explored in this article thus continue to hamper Danish-Greenlandic relations. This becomes increasingly problematic as the geopolitical competition in the Arctic draws in growing numbers of international actors, which the Danish Kingdom must be able to handle.","PeriodicalId":40761,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Politica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v54i1.130601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In both the Home Rule Act as well as the Self-Government Act, it was made clear that Greenland had and has a certain legal leeway to conduct its own foreign policy. However, the exact extent of this leeway has always been unclear. This legal ambiguity played out in practice in the case of the “Arctic Window” from 1999. Then as now, Copenhagen and Nuuk had divergent interpretations of Greenland’s leeway to conduct its own foreign policy – this divergence was not communicated openly but rather swept under the rug. The fundamental legal ambiguity has been perpetuated in the Self-Government Act in force today. The dynamics explored in this article thus continue to hamper Danish-Greenlandic relations. This becomes increasingly problematic as the geopolitical competition in the Arctic draws in growing numbers of international actors, which the Danish Kingdom must be able to handle.
北极之窗:格陵兰外交政策视角
在《地方自治法》和《自治法》中都明确指出,格陵兰在执行其自己的外交政策方面有一定的法律余地。然而,这种回旋余地的确切程度一直不清楚。这种法律上的模糊性在1999年的“北极之窗”一案中得到了体现。当时和现在一样,哥本哈根和努克对格陵兰实施自己外交政策的余地有不同的解释——这种分歧没有公开沟通,而是被掩盖了起来。在今天生效的《自治法案》中,这种基本的法律含糊不清一直存在。因此,本文探讨的动态继续阻碍丹麦-格陵兰关系。随着北极地区的地缘政治竞争吸引了越来越多的国际参与者,这变得越来越成问题,丹麦王国必须能够应对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Filosofia Politica
Filosofia Politica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信