The Gender Divide in Wikipedia: Quantifying and Assessing the Impact of Two Feminist Interventions

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Isabelle Langrock, Sandra González-Bailón
{"title":"The Gender Divide in Wikipedia: Quantifying and Assessing the Impact of Two Feminist Interventions","authors":"Isabelle Langrock, Sandra González-Bailón","doi":"10.1093/joc/jqac004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Wikipedia has a well-known gender divide affecting its biographical content. This bias not only shapes social perceptions of knowledge, but it can also propagate beyond the platform as its contents are leveraged to correct misinformation, train machine-learning tools, and enhance search engine results. What happens when feminist movements intervene to try to close existing gaps? Through a quantitative analysis of over 11,000 Wikipedia articles, we provide an evaluation of two popular feminist interventions designed to counteract gender inequality within digital information projects. We find that the interventions are successful at adding content about women that would otherwise be missing, but they are less successful at addressing structural biases that limit the visibility of that content. This leads us to argue for a more granular and cumulative analysis of gender gaps in collaborative environments. We also discuss the implications for future scholarship on digital inequalities.","PeriodicalId":53925,"journal":{"name":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Wikipedia has a well-known gender divide affecting its biographical content. This bias not only shapes social perceptions of knowledge, but it can also propagate beyond the platform as its contents are leveraged to correct misinformation, train machine-learning tools, and enhance search engine results. What happens when feminist movements intervene to try to close existing gaps? Through a quantitative analysis of over 11,000 Wikipedia articles, we provide an evaluation of two popular feminist interventions designed to counteract gender inequality within digital information projects. We find that the interventions are successful at adding content about women that would otherwise be missing, but they are less successful at addressing structural biases that limit the visibility of that content. This leads us to argue for a more granular and cumulative analysis of gender gaps in collaborative environments. We also discuss the implications for future scholarship on digital inequalities.
维基百科中的性别鸿沟:量化和评估两次女权主义干预的影响
众所周知,维基百科的传记内容存在性别差异。这种偏见不仅塑造了社会对知识的看法,而且还可以传播到平台之外,因为它的内容被用来纠正错误信息、训练机器学习工具和增强搜索引擎结果。当女权运动介入试图消除现存的差距时,会发生什么?通过对11,000多篇维基百科文章的定量分析,我们对两种流行的女权主义干预措施进行了评估,这些干预措施旨在抵消数字信息项目中的性别不平等。我们发现,这些干预措施在增加关于女性的内容方面是成功的,否则这些内容就会被遗漏,但在解决限制这些内容可见性的结构性偏见方面就不那么成功了。这导致我们主张对协作环境中的性别差距进行更细致和累积的分析。我们还讨论了数字不平等对未来学术研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信