Promoting Critical Care Nurses’ Information Literacy Through an Evidence-Based Practice Workshop: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Kobra Esfandani, S. Aliyari, AmirHosein Pishgooei, A. Ebadi
{"title":"Promoting Critical Care Nurses’ Information Literacy Through an Evidence-Based Practice Workshop: A Quasi-Experimental Study","authors":"Kobra Esfandani, S. Aliyari, AmirHosein Pishgooei, A. Ebadi","doi":"10.5812/CCN.12042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Advanced nursing practice necessitates using research findings and evidence as well as effective clinical decision making. The use of evidence in nursing practice is not only a duty, but also a professional responsibility and practice. Objectives: The current study aimed at assessing the effects of an evidence-based practice training workshop on the information literacy of critical care nurses. Methods: The current 2-group, pretest-posttest, quasi-experimental study was conducted in 2016. A convenient sample of 90 critical care nurses was selected. Nurses were non-randomly allocated to a control and an experimental group 45 subject each group. An 8hour evidence-based practice training workshop was held in 2 consecutive days for nurses in the experimental group, while nurses in the control group received no evidence-based practice training. A researcher-made valid and reliable questionnaire was used to measure the information literacy in nurses. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 19, and via running the Fisher exact, the pairedand independent-sample t tests. Results: At baseline, the mean score of information literacy in the control group did not differ significantly from that of the experimental group (9.668 ± 5.11 vs. 8.84 ± 4.37; P value = 0.40). After the study, these values increased to 10.51 ± 5.03 and 23.75 ± 3.07, respectively. Intergroup differences regarding the posttest information literacy score was statistically significant (P value < 0.001). Conclusions: The evidence-based practice training significantly promotes the information literacy in critical care nurses and paves the way for the use of evidence in their clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":91413,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/CCN.12042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Advanced nursing practice necessitates using research findings and evidence as well as effective clinical decision making. The use of evidence in nursing practice is not only a duty, but also a professional responsibility and practice. Objectives: The current study aimed at assessing the effects of an evidence-based practice training workshop on the information literacy of critical care nurses. Methods: The current 2-group, pretest-posttest, quasi-experimental study was conducted in 2016. A convenient sample of 90 critical care nurses was selected. Nurses were non-randomly allocated to a control and an experimental group 45 subject each group. An 8hour evidence-based practice training workshop was held in 2 consecutive days for nurses in the experimental group, while nurses in the control group received no evidence-based practice training. A researcher-made valid and reliable questionnaire was used to measure the information literacy in nurses. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 19, and via running the Fisher exact, the pairedand independent-sample t tests. Results: At baseline, the mean score of information literacy in the control group did not differ significantly from that of the experimental group (9.668 ± 5.11 vs. 8.84 ± 4.37; P value = 0.40). After the study, these values increased to 10.51 ± 5.03 and 23.75 ± 3.07, respectively. Intergroup differences regarding the posttest information literacy score was statistically significant (P value < 0.001). Conclusions: The evidence-based practice training significantly promotes the information literacy in critical care nurses and paves the way for the use of evidence in their clinical practice.
通过循证实践工作坊提升重症护理护士的信息素养:一项准实验研究
背景:高级护理实践需要利用研究成果和证据以及有效的临床决策。在护理实践中运用证据不仅是一种义务,也是一种职业责任和实践。目的:本研究旨在评估循证实践培训工作坊对重症护理护士信息素养的影响。方法:于2016年开展当前两组、前测后测、准实验研究。选择了90名重症护理护士作为方便的样本。护士非随机分为对照组和实验组,每组45名。实验组护士连续2天进行8小时循证实践培训,对照组护士不进行循证实践培训。采用自编有效可靠问卷对护士信息素养进行测评。收集的数据使用SPSS软件版本19进行分析,并通过运行Fisher精确,配对和独立样本t检验。结果:在基线时,对照组与实验组的信息素养平均得分无显著差异(9.668±5.11∶8.84±4.37;P值= 0.40)。研究结束后,这些数值分别增加到10.51±5.03和23.75±3.07。后测信息素养评分组间差异有统计学意义(P值< 0.001)。结论:循证实践培训能显著提高重症监护护士的信息素养,为临床实践中循证应用铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信