First in-depth analysis of enterprise architectures and models for higher education institutions

IF 0.2 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Felix Sanchez-Puchol, J. Pastor-Collado, Baptista Borrell
{"title":"First in-depth analysis of enterprise architectures and models for higher education institutions","authors":"Felix Sanchez-Puchol, J. Pastor-Collado, Baptista Borrell","doi":"10.33965/IJCSIS_2018130203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enterprise Reference Architectures (ERAs) and Reference Models (RMs) have emerged over the last years as relevant instruments for improving the quality and effectiveness of enterprise architecture (EA) practice. Whilst a wide variety of different ERAs and RMs have been proposed for different industries and types of business, only few of them have been devoted to the Higher Education (HE) sector. In this paper, we propose an in-depth analysis process which we then critically apply to review, compare and classify 20 existing ERAs and RMs targeted to the HE domain. Our process uses a common set of 12 definitional attributes. In so doing, we contribute to the existing body of knowledge by providing a unified, structured and comprehensive analysis process and catalog of these abstract EA artifacts. With this we aim to create awareness on their potential practical utility and to increase their visibility, transparency and opportunity for their reusability by different HE stakeholders. Hence, the proposed process and catalog is expected to be useful both for practitioners and researchers by providing a panoramic view of more or less ready-to-use existing ERAs and RMs for HE, as well as a structure way to regard them. Moreover, and by specifying their main scope, coverage and extend of knowledge captured, the process and catalog might become a valuable tool for providing guidance to HE stakeholders on making better-informed decisions on the selection of suitable architectural artifacts for being conveniently adapted or applied in different EA practices conducted at their respective institutions.","PeriodicalId":41878,"journal":{"name":"IADIS-International Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IADIS-International Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/IJCSIS_2018130203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Enterprise Reference Architectures (ERAs) and Reference Models (RMs) have emerged over the last years as relevant instruments for improving the quality and effectiveness of enterprise architecture (EA) practice. Whilst a wide variety of different ERAs and RMs have been proposed for different industries and types of business, only few of them have been devoted to the Higher Education (HE) sector. In this paper, we propose an in-depth analysis process which we then critically apply to review, compare and classify 20 existing ERAs and RMs targeted to the HE domain. Our process uses a common set of 12 definitional attributes. In so doing, we contribute to the existing body of knowledge by providing a unified, structured and comprehensive analysis process and catalog of these abstract EA artifacts. With this we aim to create awareness on their potential practical utility and to increase their visibility, transparency and opportunity for their reusability by different HE stakeholders. Hence, the proposed process and catalog is expected to be useful both for practitioners and researchers by providing a panoramic view of more or less ready-to-use existing ERAs and RMs for HE, as well as a structure way to regard them. Moreover, and by specifying their main scope, coverage and extend of knowledge captured, the process and catalog might become a valuable tool for providing guidance to HE stakeholders on making better-informed decisions on the selection of suitable architectural artifacts for being conveniently adapted or applied in different EA practices conducted at their respective institutions.
首先深入分析高等教育机构的企业架构和模型
企业参考架构(era)和参考模型(rm)在过去几年中作为相关工具出现,用于改进企业架构(EA)实践的质量和有效性。虽然针对不同行业和业务类型提出了各种不同的era和rm,但其中只有少数是专门针对高等教育(HE)部门的。在本文中,我们提出了一个深入的分析过程,然后我们批判性地应用于审查,比较和分类20个现有的针对HE领域的era和rm。我们的流程使用一组共有12个定义属性。在这样做的过程中,我们通过提供这些抽象EA工件的统一的、结构化的和全面的分析过程和目录,为现有的知识体系做出贡献。这样,我们的目标是让人们意识到它们潜在的实际效用,并增加它们的可见性、透明度和机会,以便不同的HE涉众可以重用它们。因此,所建议的过程和目录有望对从业者和研究人员都很有用,因为它为HE提供了或多或少现成的现有era和rm的全景视图,以及一种考虑它们的结构方式。此外,通过指定它们的主要范围、覆盖范围和所获取的知识的扩展,过程和目录可能会成为一个有价值的工具,为HE涉众提供指导,以便在选择合适的体系结构工件方面做出更明智的决策,以便在各自机构进行的不同EA实践中方便地进行调整或应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IADIS-International Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems
IADIS-International Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信