Efficacy of Early Adalimumab or Immunomodulator on Postoperative Remission Maintenance in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Randomized study

A. Yamada, H. Iwashita, S. Okazumi, H. Kikuchi, Yasuo Suzuki, K. Matsuoka
{"title":"Efficacy of Early Adalimumab or Immunomodulator on Postoperative Remission Maintenance in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Randomized study","authors":"A. Yamada, H. Iwashita, S. Okazumi, H. Kikuchi, Yasuo Suzuki, K. Matsuoka","doi":"10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: This study aim was to clarify the efficacy of early adalimumab (ADA) and azathioprine (AZA) in Postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods: In a 78-week single-center prospective study, patients with bowel resection were randomly assigned to ADA 160-80-40 mg subcutaneously (SC) or AZA 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/day. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission at 18 months (Rutgeerts i0, i1 and Simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) ≤ 4). Results: A total of 47 patients (median age 39.0 years, disease duration 9.5 years, 19.1% smokers, 44.6% previous resections) were recruited, 39 patients were received the study drugs. Endoscopic remission was confirmed in 5/16 patients in the AZA group (31.2%) and 7/12 patients in the ADA group (58.3%) (p=0.24) in the intention-to-treat population. In the per-protocol population (19 patients with evaluable images), remission was recorded in 3/9 (33.3%) patients in the AZA and 7/10 (70.0%) in the ADA group (p=0.17). Re-surgery rate was trend to higher in the AZA group (21.1%) than in the ADA group (0%) (p=0.10). Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 6 patients (15.3%), severe adverse events were significantly more frequent in the AZA group than in the ADA group (AZA, 25.0% vs ADA, 0%; p=0.04). Conclusions: Early ADA did not show statistically better efficacy than AZA for postoperative CD recurrence in this study, although safety profile of ADA is better. (UMIN000032485).","PeriodicalId":15375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical trials","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: This study aim was to clarify the efficacy of early adalimumab (ADA) and azathioprine (AZA) in Postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods: In a 78-week single-center prospective study, patients with bowel resection were randomly assigned to ADA 160-80-40 mg subcutaneously (SC) or AZA 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/day. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission at 18 months (Rutgeerts i0, i1 and Simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) ≤ 4). Results: A total of 47 patients (median age 39.0 years, disease duration 9.5 years, 19.1% smokers, 44.6% previous resections) were recruited, 39 patients were received the study drugs. Endoscopic remission was confirmed in 5/16 patients in the AZA group (31.2%) and 7/12 patients in the ADA group (58.3%) (p=0.24) in the intention-to-treat population. In the per-protocol population (19 patients with evaluable images), remission was recorded in 3/9 (33.3%) patients in the AZA and 7/10 (70.0%) in the ADA group (p=0.17). Re-surgery rate was trend to higher in the AZA group (21.1%) than in the ADA group (0%) (p=0.10). Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 6 patients (15.3%), severe adverse events were significantly more frequent in the AZA group than in the ADA group (AZA, 25.0% vs ADA, 0%; p=0.04). Conclusions: Early ADA did not show statistically better efficacy than AZA for postoperative CD recurrence in this study, although safety profile of ADA is better. (UMIN000032485).
早期阿达木单抗或免疫调节剂对克罗恩病患者术后缓解维持的疗效:随机研究
背景与目的:本研究旨在阐明早期阿达木单抗(ADA)和硫唑嘌呤(AZA)治疗克罗恩病(CD)术后复发的疗效。方法:在一项为期78周的单中心前瞻性研究中,进行肠切除术的患者被随机分配给ADA 160-80-40 mg皮下注射(SC)或AZA 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/天。主要终点为内镜下18个月的缓解(Rutgeerts i、i和Simple内镜下CD评分(SES-CD)≤4)。结果:共招募了47例患者(中位年龄39.0岁,病程9.5年,吸烟19.1%,既往手术44.6%),39例患者接受了研究药物。在意向治疗人群中,5/16的AZA组患者(31.2%)和7/12的ADA组患者(58.3%)的内镜下缓解得到证实(p=0.24)。在按方案人群(19例可评估图像的患者)中,AZA组3/9(33.3%)患者缓解,ADA组7/10(70.0%)患者缓解(p=0.17)。AZA组再手术率(21.1%)高于ADA组(0%)(p=0.10)。6例患者(15.3%)因不良事件停止治疗,AZA组严重不良事件发生率明显高于ADA组(AZA, 25.0% vs ADA, 0%;p = 0.04)。结论:在本研究中,早期ADA治疗CD术后复发的疗效没有统计学上优于AZA,尽管ADA的安全性更好。(UMIN000032485)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信