Comments on Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the Protection of Persons Who Report Breaches of Union Law

Jorgete Vitorino Clarindo dos Santos, Tania Nemer
{"title":"Comments on Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the Protection of Persons Who Report Breaches of Union Law","authors":"Jorgete Vitorino Clarindo dos Santos, Tania Nemer","doi":"10.2478/wrlae-2021-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Without some of the important information brought into light by whistleblowers, many current scandals would not have occurred. It is undeniable that whistleblowing brought into the public domain can insert a previously unforeseen and incorrigible milestone in the biography of whistleblowers, which can lead to financial loss, loss of work, affect private life, and even health. Even in situations where the whistleblower acts in good faith, he runs the risk of being publicly judged and having his reputation tarnished by lack of protection. Reporting persons may even be driven to complete isolation or pay with their lives or that of their families. In view of this, the European Union has foreseen in a new directive a better protection for whistleblowers, through the implementation of a trilateral whistleblower system. The main new feature of the European Whistleblower Protection Directive is the obligation to establish internal whistleblower channels for legal entities in the public and private sectors with at least 50 or more employees. In the public sector, Member States may exempt cities with fewer than 10,000 inhabitants or fewer than 50 employees working in the public body from the obligation to establish whistleblowing channels. If the report to the company or public body is not successful, the whistleblower may report to the press. European legislators have until December 2021 to transpose the provisions of this directive into national whistleblower protection regulations.","PeriodicalId":30439,"journal":{"name":"Wroclaw Review of Law Administration and Economics","volume":"38 1","pages":"1 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wroclaw Review of Law Administration and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2021-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Abstract Without some of the important information brought into light by whistleblowers, many current scandals would not have occurred. It is undeniable that whistleblowing brought into the public domain can insert a previously unforeseen and incorrigible milestone in the biography of whistleblowers, which can lead to financial loss, loss of work, affect private life, and even health. Even in situations where the whistleblower acts in good faith, he runs the risk of being publicly judged and having his reputation tarnished by lack of protection. Reporting persons may even be driven to complete isolation or pay with their lives or that of their families. In view of this, the European Union has foreseen in a new directive a better protection for whistleblowers, through the implementation of a trilateral whistleblower system. The main new feature of the European Whistleblower Protection Directive is the obligation to establish internal whistleblower channels for legal entities in the public and private sectors with at least 50 or more employees. In the public sector, Member States may exempt cities with fewer than 10,000 inhabitants or fewer than 50 employees working in the public body from the obligation to establish whistleblowing channels. If the report to the company or public body is not successful, the whistleblower may report to the press. European legislators have until December 2021 to transpose the provisions of this directive into national whistleblower protection regulations.
对欧洲议会和理事会2019年10月23日关于保护举报违反联盟法的人的指令(EU) 2019/1937的评论
如果没有举报人揭露的一些重要信息,当前的许多丑闻就不会发生。不可否认的是,举报人进入公共领域可以在举报人的传记中插入一个以前无法预见和不可挽回的里程碑,这可能导致经济损失,失去工作,影响私人生活,甚至健康。即使在举报人善意行事的情况下,他也有被公开评判的风险,并因缺乏保护而使其声誉受损。提交报告的人甚至可能被迫完全隔离,或以自己或家人的生命为代价。鉴于此,欧洲联盟在一项新的指令中预见到通过实施三边举报人制度来更好地保护举报人。《欧洲举报人保护指令》的主要新特点是有义务为雇员至少50人或以上的公共和私营部门的法律实体建立内部举报人渠道。在公共部门,会员国可免除居民少于10,000人或在公共机构工作的雇员少于50人的城市建立举报渠道的义务。如果向公司或公共机构举报不成功,举报人可以向新闻界举报。欧洲立法者必须在2021年12月之前将该指令的条款转化为国家举报人保护条例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信