Finding the fuel of the Arab Spring fire: a historical data analysis

Q3 Decision Sciences
D. Ahner, Luke Brantley
{"title":"Finding the fuel of the Arab Spring fire: a historical data analysis","authors":"D. Ahner, Luke Brantley","doi":"10.1108/JDAL-03-2018-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to address the reasons behind the varying levels of volatile conflict and peace as seen during the Arab Spring of 2011 to 2015. During this time, higher rates of conflict transition occurred than normally observed in previous studies for certain Middle Eastern and North African countries.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nPrevious prediction models decrease in accuracy during times of volatile conflict transition. Also, proper strategies for handling the Arab Spring have been highly debated. This paper identifies which countries were affected by the Arab Spring and then applies data analysis techniques to predict a country’s tendency to suffer from high-intensity, violent conflict. A large number of open-source variables are incorporated by implementing an imputation methodology useful to conflict prediction studies in the future. The imputed variables are implemented in four model building techniques: purposeful selection of covariates, logical selection of covariates, principal component regression and representative principal component regression resulting in modeling accuracies exceeding 90 per cent.\n\n\nFindings\nAnalysis of the models produced by the four techniques supports hypotheses which propose political opportunity and quality of life factors as causations for increased instability following the Arab Spring.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nOf particular note is that the paper addresses the reasons behind the varying levels of volatile conflict and peace as seen during the Arab Spring of 2011 to 2015 through data analytics. This paper considers various open-source, readily available data for inclusion in multiple models of identified Arab Spring nations in addition to implementing a novel imputation methodology useful to conflict prediction studies in the future.\n","PeriodicalId":32838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JDAL-03-2018-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to address the reasons behind the varying levels of volatile conflict and peace as seen during the Arab Spring of 2011 to 2015. During this time, higher rates of conflict transition occurred than normally observed in previous studies for certain Middle Eastern and North African countries. Design/methodology/approach Previous prediction models decrease in accuracy during times of volatile conflict transition. Also, proper strategies for handling the Arab Spring have been highly debated. This paper identifies which countries were affected by the Arab Spring and then applies data analysis techniques to predict a country’s tendency to suffer from high-intensity, violent conflict. A large number of open-source variables are incorporated by implementing an imputation methodology useful to conflict prediction studies in the future. The imputed variables are implemented in four model building techniques: purposeful selection of covariates, logical selection of covariates, principal component regression and representative principal component regression resulting in modeling accuracies exceeding 90 per cent. Findings Analysis of the models produced by the four techniques supports hypotheses which propose political opportunity and quality of life factors as causations for increased instability following the Arab Spring. Originality/value Of particular note is that the paper addresses the reasons behind the varying levels of volatile conflict and peace as seen during the Arab Spring of 2011 to 2015 through data analytics. This paper considers various open-source, readily available data for inclusion in multiple models of identified Arab Spring nations in addition to implementing a novel imputation methodology useful to conflict prediction studies in the future.
寻找阿拉伯之春之火的燃料:历史数据分析
本文旨在解决2011年至2015年阿拉伯之春期间不同程度的动荡冲突与和平背后的原因。在此期间,某些中东和北非国家发生冲突的比率高于以往研究中通常观察到的比率。设计/方法/方法以前的预测模型在不稳定的冲突过渡时期准确性降低。此外,应对阿拉伯之春的适当策略也一直备受争议。本文确定了哪些国家受到了阿拉伯之春的影响,然后运用数据分析技术来预测一个国家遭受高强度暴力冲突的倾向。通过实现一种对未来冲突预测研究有用的归算方法,将大量开源变量纳入其中。输入的变量在四种模型构建技术中实现:有目的的协变量选择,协变量的逻辑选择,主成分回归和代表性主成分回归,导致建模精度超过90%。发现对四种技术产生的模型的分析支持假设,这些假设提出政治机会和生活质量因素是阿拉伯之春后不稳定加剧的原因。特别值得注意的是,本文通过数据分析,探讨了2011年至2015年阿拉伯之春期间不同程度的动荡冲突与和平背后的原因。本文考虑了各种开源的、现成的数据,以包含在确定的阿拉伯之春国家的多个模型中,此外还实施了一种对未来冲突预测研究有用的新型归因方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信