Studi Kasus Difteri di Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Kota Probolinggo, Provinsi Jawa Timur Tahun 2015

IF 0.1
Mugeni Sugiharto
{"title":"Studi Kasus Difteri di Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Kota Probolinggo, Provinsi Jawa Timur Tahun 2015","authors":"Mugeni Sugiharto","doi":"10.22435/bpk.v46i3.903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pendahuluan:  Difteri merupakan penyakit menular yang mematikan dan menyerang saluran pernafasan bagian atas. Kejadian diphtheria ini dikarenakan masih ada bayi yang tidak diimunisasi DPT. Tujuan adalah mengetahui kasus difteri dan strategi penanggulangan di Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Kota Probolinggo, Tahun 2012-2014. Metode: Deskriptif menggunakan data sekunder yang didukung dengan data indepth interview. Penelitian dilakukan di Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Kota Probolinggo, karena banyaknya bayi yang tidak diimunisasi dan adanya kasus difteri. Informan adalah penanggung jawab imunisasi kabupaten. Hasil: Kasus difteri masih tinggi di Kabupaten Bangkalan, kematian terbanyak 4 orang dari 76 kasus tahun 2013. Kota Probolinggo 8 kasus, 8 sembuh tahun 2012. Terdapat bayi belum mendapat imunisasi DPT 1-3 lengkap pada usia 4 bulan dikarenakan rendahnya pengetahuan masyarakat, penolakan imunisasi, takut bayi panas dan rewel, bidan kurang fokus terhadap program imunisasi, kurang melibatkan tokoh agama. Kebijakan supervisi supportif sebagai strategi penanggulangan rendahnya cakupan DPT memberikan solusi positif. Kesimpulan: Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Kota Probolinggo berpotensi difteri, karena banyak sasaran yang tidak diimunisasi DPT lengkap, bidan tidak fokus, catatan kohort tidak akurat, tidak melibatkan tokoh agama, kurang sosialisasi, masyarakat tidak memahami imunisasi secara benar. Kebijakan penanggulangan rendahnya cakupan DPT menggunakan strategi supervisi suportif. Saran: Permenkes 42/2013, petugas diwajibkan untuk mengimunisasi semua sasaran imunisasi untuk mencegah terjadinya difteri. \n  \nABSTRACT \nBackground: Diphtheria is a deadly infectious disease and attacks the upper respiratory tract. The incidence of diphtheria is because there are still many babies who are not immunized DPT. The objective of study is to identify cases and coping strategies of diphtheria. Method: This was a descriptive study used secondary data which was supported by indepth interview. The study was conducted due to the large number of unimmunized infants and diphtheria cases in Bangkalan District and Probolinggo City, in 2012 to 2014. The informants were the people who responsible for the district immunization. Result: The case of diphtheria is still high in Bangkalan regency, with the most 4 deaths from 76 cases in 2013. Probolinggo city reported 8 cases which were all have recovered in 2012. There were infants have not received a completed of DPT 1-3 immunization at the age of 4 months due to low of public knowledge, immunizations rejection, fear of hot and fussy babies, midwives were less focused on immunization programs, and religious leaders less involved. A supportive supervision policy as a coping strategy for low DPT coverage provides a positive solution. Conclussion: Bangkalan and Probolinggo have potency of diphtheria, because many targets are uncompleted  immunized DPT, less focus of midwife, unaccurated cohort record, uninvolved religious leaders, lack of socialization, and people do not understand immunization correctly. Policy for overcoming the low coverage of DPT using a supportive supervision strategy. Suggestion: Permenkes 42/2013, officers are required to immunize all targets to prevent diphtheria.","PeriodicalId":41475,"journal":{"name":"Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22435/bpk.v46i3.903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Pendahuluan:  Difteri merupakan penyakit menular yang mematikan dan menyerang saluran pernafasan bagian atas. Kejadian diphtheria ini dikarenakan masih ada bayi yang tidak diimunisasi DPT. Tujuan adalah mengetahui kasus difteri dan strategi penanggulangan di Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Kota Probolinggo, Tahun 2012-2014. Metode: Deskriptif menggunakan data sekunder yang didukung dengan data indepth interview. Penelitian dilakukan di Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Kota Probolinggo, karena banyaknya bayi yang tidak diimunisasi dan adanya kasus difteri. Informan adalah penanggung jawab imunisasi kabupaten. Hasil: Kasus difteri masih tinggi di Kabupaten Bangkalan, kematian terbanyak 4 orang dari 76 kasus tahun 2013. Kota Probolinggo 8 kasus, 8 sembuh tahun 2012. Terdapat bayi belum mendapat imunisasi DPT 1-3 lengkap pada usia 4 bulan dikarenakan rendahnya pengetahuan masyarakat, penolakan imunisasi, takut bayi panas dan rewel, bidan kurang fokus terhadap program imunisasi, kurang melibatkan tokoh agama. Kebijakan supervisi supportif sebagai strategi penanggulangan rendahnya cakupan DPT memberikan solusi positif. Kesimpulan: Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Kota Probolinggo berpotensi difteri, karena banyak sasaran yang tidak diimunisasi DPT lengkap, bidan tidak fokus, catatan kohort tidak akurat, tidak melibatkan tokoh agama, kurang sosialisasi, masyarakat tidak memahami imunisasi secara benar. Kebijakan penanggulangan rendahnya cakupan DPT menggunakan strategi supervisi suportif. Saran: Permenkes 42/2013, petugas diwajibkan untuk mengimunisasi semua sasaran imunisasi untuk mencegah terjadinya difteri.   ABSTRACT Background: Diphtheria is a deadly infectious disease and attacks the upper respiratory tract. The incidence of diphtheria is because there are still many babies who are not immunized DPT. The objective of study is to identify cases and coping strategies of diphtheria. Method: This was a descriptive study used secondary data which was supported by indepth interview. The study was conducted due to the large number of unimmunized infants and diphtheria cases in Bangkalan District and Probolinggo City, in 2012 to 2014. The informants were the people who responsible for the district immunization. Result: The case of diphtheria is still high in Bangkalan regency, with the most 4 deaths from 76 cases in 2013. Probolinggo city reported 8 cases which were all have recovered in 2012. There were infants have not received a completed of DPT 1-3 immunization at the age of 4 months due to low of public knowledge, immunizations rejection, fear of hot and fussy babies, midwives were less focused on immunization programs, and religious leaders less involved. A supportive supervision policy as a coping strategy for low DPT coverage provides a positive solution. Conclussion: Bangkalan and Probolinggo have potency of diphtheria, because many targets are uncompleted  immunized DPT, less focus of midwife, unaccurated cohort record, uninvolved religious leaders, lack of socialization, and people do not understand immunization correctly. Policy for overcoming the low coverage of DPT using a supportive supervision strategy. Suggestion: Permenkes 42/2013, officers are required to immunize all targets to prevent diphtheria.
引言:白喉是一种致命的传染病,攻击上呼吸道。这是因为一些婴儿没有接种疫苗。目标是2011 -2014年,邦卡兰县和普罗伯灵戈县的白喉和反战略。方法:使用访谈数据索引支持的次要数据进行描述性使用。该研究是在班加兰县和普罗伯林戈县进行的,那里有大量未接种疫苗的婴儿和白喉病例。线人是地区免疫中心的负责人。结果:在班加兰省,白喉病例仍然很高,2013年76例病例中死亡人数最多4人。Probolinggo镇8例病例,2012年8例康复。由于缺乏公众知识、免疫排斥、热力和挑剔的婴儿、助产士对免疫项目的专注程度较低、宗教人士参与程度较低,因此4个月大的婴儿获得1-3个完整的免疫接种。支持监督政策作为一种低风险的应对策略,可以提供积极的解决方案。结论:邦卡兰县和普罗伯林戈镇可能是白喉,因为许多目标是没有接种疫苗的,助产士的注意力不集中,相关记录不准确,不涉及宗教人物,缺乏社会化,社会不正确理解免疫。低应对政策范围可以使用支持监督战略。建议:2013 / 22日,医生被要求对所有免疫目标进行免疫接种,以防止白喉。摘要背景:Diphtheria是一种致命的传染病,附在上面的小册子上。diphtheria的原因是还有许多婴儿没有接种疫苗。研究对象是确定的案例和应对矛盾的策略。方法:这是一个描述的研究表明,由访谈指数支持的数据。该研究预计将于2012年至2014年期间,该研究对象将被列入在班卡姆地区和推进城市的主要感染人数。线人是负责免疫区的人。建议:在摄入量的基础上仍然处于高位,2013年有76例死亡。据《八卦城》报道,2012年共有8家商店被回收。据估计,这些年轻人在4个月大的时候没有获得1-3次免疫知识、免疫缺陷、对热宝宝的恐惧和对宗教领袖的不感兴趣。支持监督政策是一种低安全性解决方案的策略。目标和发展都有可能被解除职务,因为许多目标没有完全集中,没有姐妹集中,没有准确的宗教领导,没有社会意识,人们不理解准确。政策是通过采用支持超导策略来达到低廉的覆盖范围。建议:2013年2月42日,官员们要求限制所有目标预防白喉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan
Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信